Constantine Samuel Rafinesque | |
---|---|
Constantine Samuel Rafinesque
|
|
Born | October 22, 1783 Galata, Constantinople |
Died | September 18, 1840 Philadelphia |
(aged 56)
Nationality | France |
Fields | biologist |
Author abbreviation (botany) | Raf. |
Constantine Samuel Rafinesque-Schmaltz, as he is known in Europe, (October 22, 1783 - September 18, 1840) was a nineteenth-century polymath who made notable contributions to the study of prehistoric earthworks in North America, Mesoamerican ancient linguistics, and botany and zoology. His personal life was erratic.
Many have called him a genius; he was also an eccentric autodidact. He was very successful in various fields of knowledge, as a zoologist, botanist, malacologist, meteorologist, writer, evolutionist, polyglot, and translator. He wrote prolifically on such diverse topics as anthropology, biology, geology, and linguistics, but was honored in none during his lifetime. Today, scholars agree that he was far ahead of his time in many of these fields.
Contents |
Rafinesque was born in Galata, a suburb of Constantinople. His father F.G. Rafinesque was a French merchant from Marseilles. His mother M. Schmaltz was of German descent and born in Constantinople. Rafinesque spent his youth in Marseilles and was mostly self-educated. By the age of twelve, he had learned botanical Latin and had begun collecting plants for a herbarium.
His father died in Philadelphia about 1791. In 1802, at the age of nineteen, Rafinesque came to Philadelphia with his brother, and traveled through Pennsylvania and Delaware,[1] where he made the acquaintance of most of the young nation's few botanists. In 1805 he returned to Europe with his collection of botanical specimens, and settled in Palermo, Sicily.[1] He became so successful in trade that he could retire by age twenty-five and devote his time entirely to natural history. For a time Rafinesque also worked as secretary to the American consul. During his stay in Sicily he studied plants and fishes, naming many species of each.
In 1815, after his son died, Rafinesque left his common-law wife and returned to the United States. When his ship Union foundered near the coast of Connecticut, he lost all his books (50 boxes) and all his specimens (including more than 60,000 shells.) Settling in New York, Rafinesque became a founding member of the newly established "Lyceum of Natural History." By 1818, he had collected and named more than 250 new species of plants and animals. Slowly he was rebuilding his collection of objects from nature.
To observe and compare, to correct or approve by good names and new facts that convince and improve.
In 1819 Rafinesque became professor of botany at Transylvania University, Lexington (Kentucky), where he also gave private lessons in French and Italian. He started recording all the new species of plants and animals he encountered in travels throughout the state. In 1817 his book Florula Ludoviciana drew severe criticism from fellow botanists, which caused his writings to be ignored. He was considered an erratic student of higher plants. In the spring of 1826 he left the university after quarreling with its president.
Subsequently he travelled and lectured in various places, endeavored to establish a magazine and a botanic garden, but without success. Rafinesque finally moved to Philadelphia without employment. He published The Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge, a Cyclopædic Journal and Review, of which only eight numbers appeared (1832-1833). He also gave public lectures and continued publishing, mostly at his own expense. His book Medical Flora, a Manual of the Medical Botany of the United States of North America (1828–1830) became his most financially successful work. In Herbarium Rafinesquianum, he described numerous new plants.
He also became interested in the collections of the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Among them, he gave scientific names to the Black-tailed Prairie Dog (Cynomys ludovicianus), the White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and the Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus).
In books published between 1836 and 1838, Rafinesque proposed hundreds of new genera and thousands of new species in the major floristic regions of the world. Most of these names were not accepted by the scientific community.
From his intense study, Rafinesque concluded that man's need to classify was the origin of the taxonomic categories called species and genera; that is, that they are man-made generalizations that have no physical existence. He was deeply appreciative of variation in plants. He understood that such variation, through time, will lead to the development of what we call new species. But he had no explanation for the cause of variation, though he did consider hybridity a possible mechanism. He appeared to have some perception of mutation, but never named the concept. He did not develop a theory of evolution earlier than Darwin, as sometimes has been claimed, because Rafinesque had no concept of natural selection and his understanding of geological time was far too shallow.
In 1836 Rafinesque published his first volume of The American Nations. This included Walam Olum, a purported migration and creation narrative of the Lenape ("Delaware Indians"). It told of their migration to the lands around the Delaware River. Rafinesque claimed he had obtained wooden tablets engraved and painted with indigenous pictographs, together with a transcription in the Lenape language, which he was able to use to produce an English translation of the tablets' contents. Rafinesque claimed the original tablets and transcription were later lost, leaving his notes and transcribed copy as the only record of evidence.
For over a century after Rafinesque's publication, the Walam Olum was widely accepted by ethnohistorians as authentic and Native American in origin. As early as 1849, when the documented was republished by Ephraim G. Squier, Henry Rowe Schoolcraft wrote to Squier saying that he believed the document might be fraudulent.[2] In the 1950s the Indiana Historical Society published a "re-translation" of the Walam Olum, as "a worthy subject for students of aboriginal culture".[3]
But, later linguistic, ethnohistorical, archaeological and textual analyses—particularly from the 1980s and 1990s onward— tended towards the view that the Walam Olum account was largely or entirely a fabrication. They described its record of authentic Lenape traditional migration stories as spurious. After the publication in 1995 of David Oestreicher's thesis, The Anatomy of the Walam Olum: A 19th Century Anthropological Hoax, many scholars concurred with his analysis, and concluded that Rafinesque had been either the perpetrator, or perhaps the victim, of a hoax. Other scholars, writers, and some among the Lenape continue to find the account plausible and maintain its authenticity.
Rafinesque's made a notable contribution to North American prehistory with his studies of ancient earthworks, especially in the Ohio Valley. He was first to label these the "Ancient Monuments of America." He listed more than 500 such archaeological sites, many of which have since been obliterated by competing development. Rafinesque never excavated. Rather, he recorded the sites visited by careful measurements, sketches, and written descriptions. Only a few of his descriptions found publication, but his work was used by others. For instance, he identified 148 sites in Kentucky. All of those included by E. G. Squier and Davis from that state in their famous Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley (1848) came from his manuscripts.
Rafinesque also made contributions to Mesoamerican studies. The latter were based on linguistic data he could extract from printed sources, mostly those of travelers. He designated as Taino the ancient language of the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. Others later used the term to identify the ethnicity of indigenous Caribbean peoples.
Although mistaken in his presumption that the ancient Maya script was alphabetical in nature, Rafinesque was probably first to insist that studying modern Mayan languages could lead to unraveling of the ancient script. In 1832 he was the first to decipher ancient Maya. He explained that its bar-and-dot symbols represent fives and ones, respectively)[4][5]
Rafinesque died of stomach cancer in Philadelphia. He was buried in Ronaldson's cemetery. Unfortunately his considerable collections were sold as junk or destroyed. In March 1924 what were thought to be his remains were brought back to Transylvania University and reinterred in a tomb under a stone inscribed, "Honor to whom honor is overdue."
In 1841 Thomas Nuttall proposed, in his honor, the genus name Rafinesquia, (family Asteraceae), with two species. Rafinesque himself had proposed this name twice, but was each time turned down. In 1853 Asa Gray named the second species.
In 1892 James Hall and J.M. Clarke proposed, in his honor, the genus name Rafinesquina, now in family Rafinesquinidae, for a number of fossil brachiopod species then belonging to genus Leptaena.
His scientific work has been gaining more recognition in recent years.
All of Rafinesque's malacological writings, including all his plates, can be found in the comprehensive book:
See also: Asa Gray, “Botanical Writings of Rafinesque,” Silliman's Journal, 1841.
Many of these works are available on line at Gallica and the Library of Congress.