Cro-Magnon

The original "Old man of Crô-Magnon", Musée de l'Homme, Paris

The Cro-Magnon (pronounced /kroʊˈmæɡnən/, French [kʁomaɲɔ̃]) were the first early modern humans (early Homo sapiens sapiens) of the European Upper Paleolithic in Europe. The earliest known remains of Cro-Magnon-like humans are radiometrically dated to 35,000 years before present.

Contents

Etymology

Abri de Crô-Magnon, site of the first discovery in 1868

The name derives from the Abri de Crô-Magnon (French: rock shelter of Crô-Magnon) near the commune of Les Eyzies-de-Tayac-Sireuil in southwest France, where the first specimen was found. Being the oldest known modern humans (Homo sapiens) in Europe, the Cro-Magnon were from the outset linked to the well-known Lascaux cave paintings and the Aurignacian culture that flourished in southern France and Germany. As additional remains of early modern humans were discovered in archaeological sites from Western Europe and elsewhere, and dating techniques improved in the early 20th century, new finds were added to the taxonomic classification.

The term "Cro-Magnon" soon came to be used in a general sense to describe the oldest modern people in Europe. By the 1970s the term was used for any early modern human the World over, as was the case with the far-flung Jebel Qafzeh remains in Israel and various Paleo-Indians in the Americas.[1] However, analyses based on more current data[2] concerning the migrations of early humans have contributed to a refined definition of this expression. Today, the term "Cro-Magnon" falls outside the usual naming conventions for early humans, though it remains an important term within the archaeological community as an identifier for the commensurate fossil remains in Europe and adjacent areas. Current scientific literature prefers the term "European Early Modern Humans" (or EEMH), instead of "Cro-Magnon". The oldest definitely dated EEMH specimen[2] with a modern and archaic (possibly Neanderthal) mosaic of traits is the Cro-Magnon Oase 1 find,[3] which has been dated back to 34,000–36,000 years before present.[4]

Assemblages and specimens

The French geologist Louis Lartet discovered the first five skeletons of this type in March 1868 in a rock shelter named Abri de Crô-Magnon. Similar specimens were subsequently discovered in other parts of Europe and neighboring areas.

Peştera cu Oase

The oldest non-archaic human remains from Europe are the finds from Peştera cu Oase (the Cave of Bones) near the Iron Gates in Romania. The site is situated in the Danubian corridor, which may have been the Cro-Magnon entry point into Central Europe. The cave itself appears to be a hyena or cave bear den; the human remains may have been prey or carrion. No tools are associated with the finds.

Oase 1 holotype is a robust mandible combine a variety of archaic, derived early modern, and possibly Neanderthal features. The modern attributes place it close to European early modern humans among Late Pleistocene samples. The fossil is one of the few finds in Europe which could be directly dated and is considered the oldest known early modern human fossil from Europe. Two laboratories independently yielded collagen 14C age averaging to 34 950, +990, and –890, equivalent to about 45 000 calendar years .[3] The Oase 1 mandible was discovered on February 16, 2002. A nearly complete skull of a young male (Oase 2) and fragments of another (Oase 3) were found in 2005, again with mosaic features some of which is paralleled in the Oase 1 mandible.[5]

Cro-Magnon site

Female Cro-Magnon skull
Male Cro-Magnon skull

The original Cro-Magnon find was discovered in a rock shelter at Les Eyzies, Dordogne, France. The type specimen from this find is Cro-Magnon 1, carbon dated to about 28 000 14C years old.[6] (27,680 ± 270 BP). Compared to neanderthals, the skeletons showed the same high forehead, upright posture and slender (gracile) skeleton as modern humans.

The condition and placement of the remains of Cro-Magnon 1, along with pieces of shell and animal tooth in what appear to have been pendants or necklaces raises the question whether they were buried intentionally. If Cro-Magnons buried their dead intentionally it suggests they had a knowledge of ritual, by burying their dead with necklaces and tools, or an idea of disease and that the bodies needed to be contained.[7]

Analysis of the pathology of the skeletons shows that the humans of this period led a physically difficult life. In addition to infection, several of the individuals found at the shelter had fused vertebrae in their necks, indicating traumatic injury; the adult female found at the shelter had survived for some time with a skull fracture. As these injuries would be life threatening even today, this suggests that Cro-Magnons believed in community support and took care of each other's injuries.[7]

Predmostí

A fossil site at Predmostí is located in the Moravian region of what is today the Czech Republic. The site was discovered in the late 19th century. Excavations were conducted between 1884 and 1930. The original material was lost during the 2nd World War. In the 1990s new excavations were conducted.[8]

The Predmostí site appear to have been a living area with associated burial ground with some 20 burials, including 15 complete human interments, and portions of five others, representing either disturbed or secondary burials. Canibalism has been suggested, though it is not widely accepted. The non-human fossils are mostly mammoth. Many of the bones are heavily charred, indicating they were cooked. Other remains include fox, reindeer, ice-age horse, wolf, bear, wolverine, and hare.

The Predmostí site is dated to between 24 000 and 27 000 years old. The people were essentially similar to the French Cro-Magnon finds. Though undoubtedly modern, they had robust features indicative of a big-game hunter lifestyle. They also share square eye socket openings found in the French material.[9]

Mladeč

Though younger than the Oase skull and mandible, the finds from Mladeč Caves in Moravia (Czech Republic) is one of the oldest Cro-Magnon sites. The caves have yielded the remains of several individuals, but few artifacts. The artifacts found have tentatively been classified as Aurignacian. The finds have been radiocarbon dated to around 31 000 radiocarbon years (possibly somewhat older in calendar years.[10], Mladeč 2 is dated to 31 320 +410, -390, Mladeč 9a to 31 500 +420, -400 and Mladeč 8 to 30 680 +380, -360 14C years.[11]

Other

All EEMH dates are direct fossil dates provided in 14C years B.P.[11]

Not direct dates. Radiocarbon dated were elements from adjacent layers.

Calendar years

Other sites, assemblages or specimens: Brassempouy, La Rochette, Vogelherd. Engis, Hahnöfersand, St. Prokop, Velika Pećina [16]

Origin of the Cro-Magnon people

Anatomically modern humans evolved in East Africa some 100 000 to 200 000 years ago. An exodus from Africa over the Arabian Peninsula around 60 000 years ago brought modern humans to Eurasia, with one group rapidly settling coastal areas around the Indian Ocean and one group migrating north to steppes of Central Asia.[17] A mitochondrial DNA sequence of two Cro-Magnons from the Paglicci Cave, Italy, dated to 23 000 and 24 000 years old (Paglicci 52 and 12), identified the mtDNA as Haplogroup N, typical of the latter group.[18] The inland group is the founder of North and East Asians (the "Mongol" people), Caucasoids and large sections of the Middle East and North African population. Migration from the Black Sea area into Europe started some 45 000 years ago, probably along the Danubian corridor. By 20 000 years ago, the whole of Europe was settled.

Migration of modern humans into Europe, based on simulation by Currat & Excoffier (2004)[19]
(YBP=Years Before Present)
Up to 37 500 YBP
Up to 35 000 YBP
Up to 32 500 YBP
Up to 30 000 YBP

Cro-Magnon life

Physical attributes

19th century impression of life in the upper Paleolithic. Artist: Viktor Vasnetsov, 1883
Cave painting from Lascaux, France dated to approximately 16,000 years ago (Upper Paleolithic).

Cro-Magnon were anatomically modern, straight limbed and tall compared to the contemporary Neanderthals. Physically they only differ from their modern day descendants in Europe by being on average taller, having a more robust physique and a slightly larger cranial capacity.[20] The Cro-Magnons had long, fairly low skulls, with a wide face, a prominent nose and moderate to no prognathism, similar to features seen in modern Europeans.[21] A very distinct trait is the rectangular orbits.[22] Several works on genetics, blood types and cranial morphology indicate that the Basque people may be the descendents of the original Cro-Magnon population.[23]

Mitochondrial DNA analysis place the early European population as sister group to the Asian ("Mongol") groups, dating the divergence to some 50 000 years ago.[24] While the skin- and hair colour of the Cro-Magnons can at best be guessed at, light skin is known to have evolved rapidly in the Asian and European line, suggesting Cro-Magnons were tan or lighter.[25][26] A small ivory bust of a man found at Dolní Věstonice and dated to 26 000 years indicate the Cro-Magnons had straight hair, though the somewhat later Venus of Brassempouy may show curly or possibly braided hair.

Cro-Magnon culture

The flint tools found in association with the remains at Cro-Magnon have associations with the Aurignacian culture that Lartet had identified a few years before he found the first skeletons. The Aurignacian differ from the earlier cultures by their finely worked bone or antler points and flint points made for hafting, the production of Venus figurines and cave painting.[27]

Like Neanderthals, the Cro-Magnon were primarily big-game hunters, killing mammoth, cave bears, horses and reindeer.[28] In Mezhirich village in Ukraine, several huts built from mammoth bones have been unearthed.[29]

Cro-Magnon artifacts suggest that they knew how to make woven clothing.[30] Apart from the mammoth bone huts mentioned, they constructed shelter of rocks, clay, branches, and animal hide/fur. These early humans used manganese and iron oxides to paint pictures and may have created the first calendar around 15,000 years ago[31].

Other contemporary humans in Europe

The Spreading of early modern man (red) from Africa, based on genetic studies. Green fields are Homo erectus, yellow Neanderthals. In Europe, the first modern humans (Cro-Magnons) would have run into the latter.
The Grimaldi skeletons from Monaco may have belonged to a different ethnic group

Neanderthals

The Cro-Magnon shared the European landscape with Neanderthals for some 10,000 years or more, before the latter disappear from the fossil record. The nature of their co-existence and the extinction of Neanderthals has been debated. Suggestions include peaceful co-existence, competition, interbreeding, assimilation and genocide.[2][32] Other modern people, like the Qafzeh humans seem to have co-existed with Neanderthals for up to 60,000 years in the Levant[33].

Earlier studies argue for more than 15,000 years of Neanderthal and modern human co-existence in France.[34][35] A simulation based on a slight difference in carrying capacity in the two groups indicates that the two groups would only be found together in a narrow zone, at the front of the Cro-Magnon immigration wave.[19]

The Neanderthal Châtelperronian culture appears to have been influenced by the Cro-Magnons, indicating some sort of cultural exchange between the two groups.[36] At the original Châtelperronian site layers of Châtelperronian artifacts alternate with Aurignacian, though this may be a result of interstratified ("chronologically mixed") layers, or disturbances from earlier excavations.[37] The "Lapedo child" found at Abrigo do Lagar Velho in Portugal has been quoted as being a possible Neanderthal/Cro-Magnon hybrid, though this interpretation is disputed.[15]

Contemporary early modern humans in Europe?

The so-called Grimaldi Man may have been a contemporary group of modern humans, distinct from the Cro-Magnons.[38] The find is from the "Grotte des Enfants" near Menton on the French Riviera. The two known skeletons are shorter and more gracile than the Cro-Magnon, and the skulls are taller and less robust, with signs of prognathism, all interpreted as African traits.[39][40] The interpretation of the Grimaldi finds as belonging to a "negroid" race is complicated by the two skeletons being that of a woman and an adolescent and some dubious reconstruction work.[41] The finds were classified as Cro-Magnon under the wide use of the term in the mid-20th century.[39] Due to the reconstruction and racist theory forwarded by the early description, the Grimaldi finds have been largely ignored in recent literature.

Genetics

A 2003 sequencing on two Cro-Magnons, 23,000 and 24,000 years old Paglicci 52 and Paglicci 12, mitochondrial DNA, published by an Italo-Spanish research team led by David Caramelli, identified the mtDNA as Haplogroup N.[18] Haplogroup N is found among modern populations of Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia, and represent the northern branch of the out of Africa migration of modern humans. Its descendant haplogroups are found among modern North African, Eurasian, Polynesian and Native American populations.[42]

Recent genetic studies of a wide selection of modern humans indicate some form of hybridization with archaic humans took place after modern humans emerged from Africa. About 1 to 4 percent of the DNA in Europeans and Asians appears to be derived from Neanderthals, though none of it can conclusively be tied to a European event.[43]

See also

Further reading

External links

References

  1. Brace, C. Loring (1996). Haeussler, Alice M.; Bailey, Shara E.. eds. "Cro-Magnon and Qafzeh — vive la Difference" (PDF). Dental anthropology newsletter: a publication of the Dental Anthropology Association (Tempe, AZ: Laboratory of Dental Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University) 10 (3): 2–9. ISSN 1096-9411. OCLC 34148636. http://anthropology.osu.edu/DAA/back%20issues/DA_10_03.pdf#page=2. Retrieved 31 March 2010. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Trinkaus, Erik (April 2004). Schekman, Randy. ed. "European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals" (pdf+html). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Washington, D.C.: The Academy,) 104 (18): 7367–7372. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702214104. ISSN 0027-8424. OCLC 1607201. PMID 17452632. PMC 1863481. http://www.pnas.org/content/104/18/7367.full.pdf+html. Retrieved 31 March 2010. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Trinkaus, E; Moldovan, O; Milota, S; Bîlgăr, A; Sarcina, L; Athreya, S; Bailey, Se; Rodrigo, R; Mircea, G; Higham, T; Ramsey, Cb; Van, Der, Plicht, J (September 2003). "An early modern human from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania" (Free full text). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (20): 11231–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.2035108100. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 14504393. PMC 208740. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=14504393. ""When multiple measurements are undertaken, the mean result can be determined through averaging the activity ratios. For Oase 1, this provides a weighted average activity ratio of 〈14a〉 = 1.29 ± 0.15%, resulting in a combined OxA-GrA 14C age of 34,950, +990, and –890 B.P."". 
  4. Trinkaus, Erik; Moldovan, Oana; Milota, Ştefan; Bîlgăr, Adrian; Sarcina, Laurenţiu; Athreya, Sheela; Bailey, Shara E.; Rodrigo, Ricardo et al. (September 2003). Schekman, Randy. ed. "An early modern human from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania" (pdf+html). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Washington, D.C: The Academy,) 100 (20): 11,231–11,236. doi:10.1073/pnas.2035108100. ISSN 0027-8424. OCLC 1607201. PMID 14504393. PMC 208740. http://www.pnas.org/content/100/20/11231.full.pdf+html. Retrieved 31 March 2010. "...it has unilateral mandibular foramen lingular bridging, an apparently derived Neandertal feature. It therefore presents a mosaic of archaic, early modern human and possibly Neandertal morphological features, emphasizing both the complex population dynamics of modern human dispersal into Europe and the subsequent morphological evolution of European early modern humans.". 
  5. Rougier, H. & al. (2006): Peştera cu Oase 2 and the cranial morphology of early modern Europeans. PNAS, vol. 104 no. 4, pages 1165-1170 Summary
  6. [1]
  7. 7.0 7.1 Museum of Natural History
  8. Svoboda, J.A. (2008): The Upper Paleolithic burial area at Predmostí: ritual and taphonomy. Journal of Human Evolution no 54(1): page 15-33.
  9. Velemínská, J. et al. (2008): Variability of the Upper Palaeolithic skulls from Predmostí near Prerov (Czech Republic): Craniometric comparison with recent human standards. HOMO no 59(1): page 1-26.
  10. Wild, Em; Teschler-Nicola, M; Kutschera, W; Steier, P; Trinkaus, E; Wanek, W (May 2005). "Direct dating of Early Upper Palaeolithic human remains from Mladec" (PDF). Nature 435 (7040): 332–5. doi:10.1038/nature03585. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 15902255. http://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/~lchang/material/Evolutionary/Time%20out%20of%20Africa.pdf. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 Higham, T; Ramsey, Cb; Karavanić, I; Smith, Fh; Trinkaus, E (January 2006). "Revised direct radiocarbon dating of the Vindija G1 Upper Paleolithic Neandertals" (Free full text). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (3): 553–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510005103. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 16407102. PMC 1334669. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16407102. 
  12. Anikovich, Mv; Sinitsyn, Aa; Hoffecker, Jf; Holliday, Vt; Popov, Vv; Lisitsyn, Sn; Forman, Sl; Levkovskaya, Gm; Pospelova, Ga; Kuz'Mina, Ie; Burova, Nd; Goldberg, P; Macphail, Ri; Giaccio, B; Praslov, Nd (January 2007). "Early Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and implications for the dispersal of modern humans". Science (New York, N.Y.) 315 (5809): 223–6. doi:10.1126/science.1133376. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17218523. 
  13. [2]
  14. Harvati et al., ʺThe Partial Cranium from Cioclovina, Romania: Morphological Affinities of an Early Modern Europeanʺ2007?
  15. 15.0 15.1 Cidalia Duarte, Joao Mauricio, Paul B. Pettitt, Pedro Souto, Erik Trinkaus, Hans van der Plicht and Joao Zilhao (June 22, 1999). "The Early Upper Paleolithic Human Skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) and Modern Human Emergence in Iberia" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 (13): 7604–7609. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.13.7604. PMID 10377462. PMC 22133. http://anaconda.ub.rug.nl/misc/ESI4CvD/Gronigen.PNAS.pdf. 
  16. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510005103
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  17. "Atlas of human journey: 45 - 40,000". The genographic project. National Geographic Society. 1996-2010. https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/lan/en/atlas.html. Retrieved 31 March 2010. 
  18. 18.0 18.1 Caramelli, D; Lalueza-Fox, C; Vernesi, C; Lari, M; Casoli, A; Mallegni, F; Chiarelli, B; Dupanloup, I; Bertranpetit, J; Barbujani, G; Bertorelle, G (May 2003). "Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neandertals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans" (Free full text). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (11): 6593–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1130343100. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 12743370. PMC 164492. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12743370. 
  19. 19.0 19.1 Currat, M. & Excoffier, L. (2004): Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe. PLoS Biol no 2 (12): e421. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020421
  20. "Cro-Magnon". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9027935. Retrieved March 2007. 
  21. Velemínskáa, J. , Brůžekb, J., Velemínskýd, P., Bigonia, L., Šefčákováe, A. & Katinaf, F. (2008): Variability of the Upper Palaeolithic skulls from Předmostí near Přerov (Czech Republic): Craniometric comparison with recent human standards. HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology no 59, Issue 1, Pages 1-26 Article from Science Direct
  22. Human Evolution: Interpreting Evidence Cro-Magnon 1, from Museum of Science
  23. Cavalli-Sforza, L. Luca; Menozzi, Paolo; and Piazza Alberto The History and Geography of Human Genes Princeton, New Jersey: 1994 Princeton University Press Page 280
  24. Maca-Meyer N, González AM, Larruga JM, Flores C, Cabrera VM (2001). "Major genomic mitochondrial lineages delineate early human expansions". BMC Genet. 2: 13. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-2-13. PMID 11553319. PMC 55343. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/2/13. 
  25. Sweet, Frank W. (2002). "The Paleo-Etiology of Human Skin Tone". http://www.backintyme.com/Essay021215.htm. 
  26. Norton, & al. (2006): Genetic Evidence for the Convergent Evolution of Light Skin in Europeans and East Asians. Molecular Biology and Evolution Volume 24, Number 3, pages 710-722 article
  27. Bar-Yosef, O & Zilhão, J (eds) 2002: Towards a definition of the Aurignacian. Proceedings of the Symposium held in Lisbon, Portugal, June 25–30. Trabalhos de Arqueologia no 45. 381 pages. PDF
  28. University Of Washington. "Bones From French Cave Show Neanderthals, Cro-Magnon Hunted Same Prey." ScienceDaily 23 September 2003. 29 March 2010 <http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2003/09/030923065212.htm>.
  29. Pidoplichko, I. H. (1998): Upper Palaeolithic dwellings of mammoth bones in the Ukraine: Kiev-Kirillovskii, Gontsy, Dobranichevka, Mezin and Mezhirich, Oxford: J. and E. Hedges. ISBN 0-86054-949-6.
  30. Kvavadze E, Bar-Yosef O, Belfer-Cohen A, Boaretto E,Jakeli N, Matskevich Z, Meshveliani T. (2009).30,000-Year-Old Wild Flax Fibers. Science, 325(5946):1359. doi:10.1126/science.1175404 [/http://worldtextile.aimoo.com/ Supporting Online Material]
  31. according to a claim by Michael Rappenglueck, of the University of Munich (2000) [3]
  32. Diamond, Jared (1992). The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal. Harper Perennial. ISBN 0060984031 
  33. Ofer Bar-Yosef & Bernard Vandermeersch, Scientific American, April 1993, 94-100
  34. Mellars, P (February 2006). "A new radiocarbon revolution and the dispersal of modern humans in Eurasia". Nature 439 (7079): 931–5. doi:10.1038/nature04521. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 16495989. 
  35. Gravina, B; Mellars, P; Ramsey, Cb (November 2005). "Radiocarbon dating of interstratified Neanderthal and early modern human occupations at the Châtelperronian type-site". Nature 438 (7064): 51–6. doi:10.1038/nature04006. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 16136079. 
  36. d'Errico, F.D., Zilhao, J., Julien, M., Baffier, D. and Pelerin, J. 1998. Neanderthal Acculturation in Western Europe? A Critical Review of the Evidence and its Interpretation. Current Anthropology Supplement to 39: S1-S44
  37. Zilhão, J; D'Errico, F; Bordes, Jg; Lenoble, A; Texier, Jp; Rigaud, Jp (August 2006). "Analysis of Aurignacian interstratification at the Chatelperronian-type site and implications for the behavioral modernity of Neandertals" (Free full text). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (33): 12643–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605128103. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 16894152. PMC 1567932. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16894152. 
  38. Verneau, R. (1906): Les fouilles du Prince de Monaco aux Baoussé Roussé. Un nouveau type humain. L'anthropologie no 13, pages 561-585
  39. 39.0 39.1 Legoux, P. (1966): Détermination de l'âge dentaire de fossiles de la lignée humaine, Paris, Maloine
  40. Keith, A. (1911): Ancient Types of Man. Harper and Brothers Read book online
  41. Marianne Cornevin and Jean Leclant, Secrets du continent noir révélés par l'archéologie, p. 40
  42. https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/atlas.html
  43. Callaway, E. (2010): Neanderthal genome reveals interbreeding with humans. New Scientist online, May 6th, 2010. article