Consumer choice

General categories
Economics

Economies by region Africa · North America South America · Asia Europe · Oceania
Microeconomics · Macroeconomics History of economic thought Methodology · Heterodox approaches
Methods
Mathematical (Game theory · Optimization) Econometrics · Experimental · Statistics
Fields and subfields
Behavioral · Cultural · Evolutionary Growth · Development · History International · Economic systems Monetary and Financial economics Public and Welfare economics Health · Education · Welfare Population · Labour · Managerial Business · Information Industrial organization · Law Agricultural · Natural resource Environmental · Ecological Urban · Rural · Regional · Geography
Lists
Journals · Publications Categories · Topics · Economists
Economic ideologies Anarchism · Capitalism Communism · Corporatism Fascism · Feudalism Georgism · Imperialism Islamic · Laissez-faire Leninism · Maoism Market socialism · Marxism Monarchy · Monopolism Mercantilism · Neocolonialism Oligarchy · Oligopoly Plutocracy · Primitivism Protectionism · Socialism Syndicalism · Third Way
The economy: concept and history
Business and Economics Portal

Consumer choice is a theory of microeconomics that relates preferences to consumer demand curves. The link between personal preferences, consumption, and the demand curve is one of the most complex relations in economics. Implicitly, economists assume that anything purchased will be consumed, unless the purchase is for a productive activity.

Preferences are the desires by each individual for the consumption of goods and services, and ultimately translate into employment choices based on abilities and the use of the income from employment for purchases of goods and services to be combined with the consumer's time to define consumption activities.

Consumption is separated from production, logically, because two different consumers are involved. In the first case consumption is by the primary individual; in the second case, a producer might make something that he would not consume himself. Therefore, different motivations and abilities are involved.

The models that make up consumer theory are used to represent prospectively observable demand patterns for an individual buyer on the hypothesis of constrained optimization.

Prominent variables used to explain the rate at which the good is purchased (demanded) are the price per unit of that good, prices of related goods, and wealth of the consumer.

The fundamental theorem of demand states that the rate of consumption falls as the price of the good rises. This is called the substitution effect. As prices rise, consumers will substitute away from higher priced goods and services, choosing less costly alternatives. Subsequently, as the wealth of the individual rises, demand increases, shifting the demand curve higher at all rates of consumption. This is called the income effect. As wealth rises, consumers will substitute away from less costly inferior goods and services, choosing higher priced alternatives.

1 Model setup
2 Substitution effect
3 Income effect
4 Price effect as sum of substitution and income effects
5 Assumptions of consumer preference theory
6 Labor-leisure tradeoff
7 See also
8 References

Model setup

For an individual, indifference curves and an assumption of constant prices and a fixed income in a two-good world will give the following diagram. The consumer can choose any point on or below the budget constraint line BC. This line is diagonal since it comes from the equation $xp_X + y p_Y \leq \mathrm{income}$ . In other words, the amount spent on both goods together is less than or equal to the income of the consumer. The consumer will choose the indifference curve with the highest utility that is within his budget constraint. Every point on I3 is outside his budget constraint so the best that he can do is the single point on I2 that is tangent to his budget constraint. He will purchase X* of good X and Y* of good Y.

link between indifference curves budget constraint an consumers choice.

Income effect and price effect deal with how the change in price of a commodity changes the consumption of the good. The theory of consumer choice examines the trade-offs and decisions people make in their role as consumers as prices and their income changes.

Substitution effect

The substitution effect is the effect observed with changes in relative price of goods.

These curves can be used to predict the effect of changes to the budget constraint. The graphic below shows the effect of a price increase for good Y. If the price of Y increases, the budget constraint will pivot from BC2 to BC1. Notice that because the price of X does not change, the consumer can still buy the same amount of X if he or she chooses to buy only good X. On the other hand, if the consumer chooses to buy only good Y, he or she will be able to buy less of good Y because its price has increased.

To maximize the utility with the reduced budget constraint, BC1, the consumer will re-allocate consumption to reach the highest available indifference curve which BC1 is tangent to. As shown on the diagram below, that curve is I1, and therefore the amount of good Y bought will shift from Y2 to Y1, and the amount of good X bought to shift from X2 to X1. The opposite effect will occur if the price of Y decreases causing the shift from BC2 to BC3, and I2 to I3.

link to shifting price of good y and quantity of goods consumed as a result

If these curves are plotted for many different prices of good Y, a demand curve for good Y can be constructed. The diagram below shows the demand curve for good Y as its price varies. Alternatively, if the price for good Y is fixed and the price for good X is varied, a demand curve for good X can be constructed.

example of going from indifference curves to demand curve

Income effect

Another important item that can change is the money income of the consumer. The income effect is the phenomenon observed through changes in purchasing power. It reveals the change in quantity demanded brought by a change in real income (utility). Graphically, as long as the prices remain constant, changing the income will create a parallel shift of the budget constraint. Increasing the income will shift the budget constraint right since more of both can be bought, and decreasing income will shift it left.

link to shifting income of consumer and quantity of goods consumed as a result

Depending on the indifference curves the amount of a good bought can either increase, decrease or stay the same when income increases. In the diagram below, good Y is a normal good since the amount purchased increased as the budget constraint shifted from BC1 to the higher income BC2. Good X is an inferior good since the amount bought decreased as the income increases.

example of a normal good and an inferior good

$\Delta y_1^n$ is the change in the demand for good 1 when we change income from $m'$ to $m$ , holding the price of good 1 fixed at $p_1'$ :

$\Delta y_1^n = y_1(p_1', m) - y_1(p_1',m').$

Price effect as sum of substitution and income effects

Every price change can be decomposed into an income effect and a substitution effect; the price effect is the sum of substitution and income effects.

The substitution effect is a price change that alters the slope of the budget constraint but leaves the consumer on the same indifference curve. In other words, it illustrates the consumer's new consumption basket after the price change while being compensated as to allow the consumer to be as happy as previously. By this effect, the consumer is posited to substitute toward the good that becomes comparatively less expensive. In the illustration below this corresponds to an imaginary budget constraint denoted SC being tangent to the indifference curve I1.

If the good in question is a normal good, then the income effect from the rise in purchasing power from a price fall reinforces the substitution effect. If the good is an inferior good, then the income effect will offset in some degree the substitution effect. If the income effect for an inferior good is sufficiently strong, the consumer will buy less of the good when it becomes less expensive, a Giffen good (commonly believed to be a rarity).

example of substitution effect

In the figure, the substitution effect, $\Delta y_1^s$ , is the change in the amount demanded for $\ y$ when the price of good $\ y$ falls from $\ p_1$ to $\ p_1'$ (increasing purchasing power for $\ y$ ) and, at the same time, the money income falls from $m$ to $m'$ to keep the consumer at the same level of utility on $\ I1$ :

$\Delta y_1^s = y_1(p_1', m') - y_1(p_1,m).$

The substitution effect increases the amount demanded of good $\ y$ from $\ y_1$ to $\ y_s$ . In the example, the income effect of the price fall in $\ y_1$ partly offsets the substitution effect as the amount demanded of $\ y$ goes from $\ y_s$ to $\ y_2$ . Thus, the price effect is the algebraic sum of the substitution effect and the income effect.

Assumptions of consumer preference theory

The behavioral assumption of consumer theory is that all consumers are rational decision makers who seek to maximize utility.^[1] More specifically all consumers seek to maximize a utility function subject to a budgetary constraint. This means that consumer theory asserts that all consumers purchase that combination of goods and services that will make them happiest given the amount of income they have to spend.^[2] The fundamental problem of consumer theory is to derive a demand function from the behavioral postulates of the theory.^[3] Economists' modern solution to this problem is indifference curve analysis. Indifference curve analysis begins with the utility function. The utility function is treated as an index of utility.^[4] All that is necessary is that the utility index change as more preferred bundles are consumed. Indifference curves are typically numbered with the number increasing as more preferred bundles are consumed. However, it is not necessary that numbers be used - any indexing system would suffice - colors for example. The advantage of numbers is that their use makes the math simpler. Numbers used to index indifference curves have no cardinal significance. For example if three indifference curves are labeled 1, 4, and 16 respectively that means nothing more than the bundles "on" indifference curve 4 are more preferred than the bundles "on" indifference curve I. The fact that the index number is a multiple of another is of no significance. For example, the bundles of good on 4 does not mean that they are four times more satisfying than those on 1. As noted they merely mean they are more satisfying.

!.Preferences are complete -

Assume that there are two consumption bundles A and B each containing two commodities x and y. A consumer can unambiguously make the following comparisons:

A is preferred to B [3]
B is referred to A [4]
A is indifferent to B [5]

Note that this axiom precludes the possibility that the consumer cannot decide. The consumer will chose A, B, or simply not care which she receives; "Six of one or half a dozen of another." Indifference is different from indecision, as "I don't care" is different from "I can't make up my mind".[6]
Note this assumption means that a consumer is able to make this comparison with respect to every conceivable bundle of goods.[7]

Preferences are reflexive

Means that if A and B are in all respect identical the consumer will recognize this fact and be indifferent in comparing A and B

[8]

Preference are transitive[9]

If A is preferred to B and B is preferred to C then A must be preferred to C.[10]

this also means that if the consumer is indifferent between A and B and is indifferent between B and C she will be indifferent between A and C.
This is the consistency assumption. A real world example: You enter a restaurant where the available soups are pea soup, tomato soup and mushroom soup. The waiter asks "What will you have?" You say "I don't know; I prefer pea soup over tomato soup and tomato soup over mushroom soup, and I prefer mushroom soup over pea soup. Listen, why don't you chose for me." The waiter won't be able to help you.
This assumption eliminates the possibility of intersecting indifference curves.

Preferences are continuous

If A is preferred to B and C is infinitesimally close to B then A is preferred to C.

continuous" means infinitely divisible - just like there are an infinity of numbers between 1 and 2, all bundles are infinitely divisible. This assumption allows the use of curves and areas all the basic requirements of differential and integral calculus. Sine qua non.

Preferences exhibit non-satiation.

if A and B have identical amounts of x and A has a little more y than B then A is preferred to B,

this is the more is better assumption or i never saw a donut i didn't like
Among other things this assumption precludes the embarrassment of circular indifference curve - [12]
Non-satiation is not a necessary but a convenient assumption. It avoids unnecessary complications in the mathematical models.

Indifference Curves exhibit diminishing marginal rates of substitution

This assumption assures that indifference curves are smooth and convex to the origin.
This assumption is implicit in the last assumption.
This assumption also set the stage for using techniques of constrained optimization. Because the shape of the curve assures that the first derivative is negative and the second is positive.
The MRS tells how much y a person is willing to sacrifice to get one more unit of x.
This assumption incorporates the theory of diminishing marginal utility.

The primary reason to have these technical preferences is to replicate the properties of the real number system so the math will work.

Note the assumptions do not guarantee that the demand curve will be negatively sloped. A positively sloped curve is not inconsistent with the assumptions. Binger & Hoffman, Microeconomics with Calculus 2d ed. (Addison Wesley 1998) at 141-43.

Labor-leisure tradeoff

Consumer theory can also be used to analyze a consumer's choice between leisure and labor. Leisure is considered one good (often put on the horizontal-axis) and consumption is considered the other good. Since a consumer has a finite and scarce amount of time, he must make a choice between leisure (which earns no income for consumption) and labor (which does earn income for consumption).

The previous model of consumer choice theory is applicable with only slight modifications. First, the total amount of time that an individual has to allocate is known as his time endowment, and is often denoted as T. The amount an individual allocates to labor (denoted L) and leisure (l) is constrained by T such that:

$l + L = T\,\!$

$l + (T-l) = T\,\!$

A person's consumption is the amount of labor they choose multiplied by the amount they are paid per hour of labor (their wage, often denoted w). Thus, the amount that a person consumes is:

$C = w(T-l)\,\!$

When a consumer chooses no leisure $(l=0)$ then $T-l = T$ and $C = wT$ .

From this labor-leisure tradeoff model, the substitution and income effects of various changes in price caused by welfare benefits, labor taxation, or tax credits can be analyzed.

References

↑ Silberberg & Suen, The Structure of Economics, A Mathematical Analysis, (McGraw-Hill 2001) at 253.
↑ The assumption is that individuals always act if their rational self-interest. They consider only the benefits and costs to them. The effects on others is irrelevant. It is all about ME.
↑ Silberberg & Suen at 252.
↑ Silberberg & Suen at 255.

Volker Böhm and Hans Haller (1987). "Demand theory," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 1, pp. 785–92.
John R. Hicks (1939, 2nd ed. 1946). Value and Capital.

Microeconomics

Major topics	Aggregation · Budget · Cost benefit analysis · Consumer · Cost · Distribution · Equilibria · Elasticity · Exchange · Expected utility · Externality · Firms · General equilibria · Household · Information · Intertemporal choice · Market failure · Market structure · Monopoly · Monopsony · Oligopoly · Opportunity cost · Preferences · Prices · Production · Profit · Public goods · Risk · Scarcity · Shortage · Social choice · Supply & demand · Surplus · Uncertainty · Utility theory · Welfare

Related	Behavioral · Business · Computational · Decision theory · Econometrics · Experimental · Game theory · Industrial organization · Mathematical economics · Microfoundations of Macroeconomics · Managerial · Operations research · Optimization