This article is part of the Politics series |
Forms of government |
---|
List of government types |
|
Politics portal |
A confederation is an association of sovereign member states, that by treaty have delegated certain of their competences to common institutions, in order to coordinate their policies in a number of areas, without constituting a new state on top of the member states. Under international law a confederation respects the sovereignty of its members and its constituting treaty can only be changed by unanimous agreement.
A confederation in modern political terms is a permanent union of sovereign states for common action in relation to other states.[1] Usually created by treaty but often later adopting a common constitution, confederations tend to be established for dealing with critical issues such as defense, foreign affairs or a common currency, with the central government being required to provide support for all members.
The nature of the relationship among the states constituting a confederation varies considerably. Likewise, the relationship between the member states, the central government and the distribution of powers among them, is highly variable. Some looser confederations are similar to intergovernmental organizations, while tighter confederations may resemble federations.
In a non-political context, confederation is used to describe a type of organization which consolidates authority from other semi-autonomous bodies. Examples include sports confederations or confederations of Pan-European trades unions.
In Canada, the word confederation has an additional, unrelated meaning.[2] It refers to the process of (or the event of) establishing a federation.[3] Canadian Confederation generally refers to the Constitution Act, 1867 which initially united three colonies of British North America (Province of Canada, Province of New Brunswick and Province of Nova Scotia), and to the subsequent incorporation of other colonies and territories; Canada, however, is a federation and not a confederation, since it is a sovereign nation-state.
Contents |
By definition the difference between a confederation and a federation is that the membership of the member states in a confederation is voluntary, while the membership in a federation is not.[4][5][6][7] A confederation is most likely to feature these differences over a federation:
(Example)
Confederation for Canada happened (officially "British North America Act 1867") on July 1, 1867 when it separated from Britain under the leadership of Sir John A. Macdonald. The provinces first involved were Canada West (Ontario), Canada East (Quebec), Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. later joining Confederation were Manitoba, British Columbia, PEI, Alberta and Saskatchewan and finally Newfoundland in 1949.
Switzerland, is officially known as the Swiss Confederation, is a notable modern example of a confederation.[8][9][10] It has been a confederacy since its inception in 1291, and so remains namely to the present day. The Old Swiss Confederacy was originally created as an alliance among the valley communities of the central Alps. The confederacy facilitated management of common interests (free trade) and ensured peace on the important mountain trade. It should be noted, however, that Switzerland is a confederation only in name as, after the civil war of 1847 when some of the Catholic cantons tried to set up a separate alliance (the Sonderbundskrieg), the resulting political system acquired all the characteristics of a federation.[11]
The Iroquois League, historically the Iroquois Confederacy, is a group of First Nations/Native Americans that consist of six nations: the Mohawk, the Oneida, the Onondaga, the Cayuga, the Seneca and the Tuscarora. The Iroquois have a representative government known as the Grand Council. The Grand Council is the oldest governmental institution still maintaining its original form in North America.[12] Each tribe sends chiefs to act as representatives and make decisions for the whole nation.
Due to its unique nature, and political sensitivities surrounding it, there is no common or legal classification of for the European Union (EU). However, it does bear some resemblance to a confederation or federation. The EU operates common economic policies with hundreds of common laws to enable a single economic market, open internal borders, a common currency and numerous other areas where powers have been transferred and directly applicable laws are made. However unlike a federation the EU does not have exclusive powers over foreign affairs, defence and taxation. Furthermore: laws sometimes needs transcribing into national law by national parliaments; decisions by member states are taken by special majorities with blocking minorities accounted form; and treaty amendment requires ratification by every member state before it can come into force.
However academic observers more usually discuss the EU in the terms of it being a federation;[13][14]
“ | Europe has charted its own brand of constitutional federalism. | ” |
— Joseph H. H. Weiler
|
“ | Those uncomfortable using the “F” word in the EU context should feel free to refer to it as a quasi-federal or federal-like system. Nevertheless, for the purposes of the analysis here, the EU has the necessary attributes of a federal system. It is striking that while many scholars of the EU continue to resist analyzing it as a federation, most contemporary students of federalism view the EU as a federal system (See for instance, Bednar, Filippov et al., McKay, Kelemen, Defigueido and Weingast). | ” |
— (R. Daniel Kelemen, Rutgers University)
|
Many authors are now speaking of Belgium as a country with some aspects of a confederation. C.E. Lagasse wrote it about the agreements between Belgian Regions and Communities: We are near the political system of a Confederation.[15] Vincent de Coorebyter, Director of the CRISP [16] wrote in Le Soir Belgian is undoubtedly a federation... [but] has some aspects of a confederation[17] Michel Quévit, Professor at the Université Catholique de Louvain wrote also in Le Soir The Belgian political system is already in dynamics of a Confederation.[18] The same author wrote already about this issue in 1984 with other Professors.[19]
Note that historical confederations (especially those predating the 20th century) may not fit the current definition of a confederation, may be proclaimed as a federation but be confederal (or the reverse), and may not show any qualities that are today recognized as those of a federation.
Some have more the characteristics of a personal union, but they are listed here because of their own self-styling.
|
|