Spider

Spiders
an Orb-weaver spider, Family: Araneidae
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Araneae
Clerck, 1757
Diversity
111 families, c.40,000 species
Suborders

Mesothelae
Mygalomorphae
Araneomorphae
 See table of families

Spiders are air-breathing chelicerate arthropods that have two body segments, eight legs, and no chewing mouth parts. About 40,000 species have been identified. In spiders' bodies the usual arthropod segments are fused into two tagmata, the cephalothorax and abdomen, joined by a small, cylindrical pedicel. As in all arthropods the coelom is very small and the main body cavity is a hemocoel through which hemolymph delivers oxygen and nutrients to the tissues and removes waste products. The gut is so narrow that spiders cannot eat large lumps of solid matter, and spiders liquidize their food by flooding it with digestive enzymes and grinding it with the appendages around their mouths. In all except the most primitive group, the Mesothelae, spiders have the most centralized nervous systems of all arthropods, as all their ganglia are fused into one mass in the cephalothorax. Unlike most arthropods, spiders have no extensor muscles in their limbs and instead extend them by hydraulic pressure. Their abdomens bear appendages that have been modified into spinnerets that extrude silk from up to six types of silk gland within their abdomens. Spider silk provides a combination of lightness, strength and elasticity that is superior to that of synthetic materials, and spider silk genes have been inserted into mammals and plants to see if these can be used as silk factories. As a result of their wide range of behaviors, spiders have become common symbols in art and mythology, symbolizing various combinations of patience, cruelty and creative powers.

A vegetarian species was described in 2007, but all others are predators, mostly preying on insects and on other spiders, although a few large species also take birds and lizards. However the young of many spiders supplement their diet with nectar and there is statistical evidence that adults supplement theirs with pollen. Spiders' chelicerae are modified into fangs, which in most cases can inject venom into prey. While the venom of a few species is dangerous to humans, scientists are now researching the use of spider venoms in medicine and as non-polluting pesticides. Spiders capture prey by trapping it in sticky webs, waiting in ambush for it or running it down. Species that use webs or ambush tactics are extremely sensitive to vibrations in the air, ground and silk threads that they use as tripwires, while the active hunters have eyesight up to ten times as acute as that of dragonflies. Some active hunters also use different tactics for different prey, and show signs of intelligence by trying a variety of tactics against difficult prey and by learning very quickly what tactics to adopt against unfamiliar prey. Others have modified bodies and behavior patterns that enable them to mimic ants on which they prey. Spider's webs vary widely in size, shape and the amount of sticky thread used. It now appears that the spiral orb web may be one of the earliest forms. Orb-web spiders, although well-known and the most extensively studied, are a minority of spider species and spiders that produce other types of web are more abundant, possibly because their tangled webs present greater obstacles to predatory wasps.

In males spiders the pedipalps (appendages just below / behind the mouth) are modified as syringes that inject sperm into females' genitalia. To avoid being eaten before they can mate, male spiders identify themselves by a variety of complex courtship rituals. Males of most species survive a few matings, limited mainly by their short life spans, and in a few species males live for a while in their mates' webs. However males of a few species impale themselves on the females' fangs while mating, perhaps because ensuring that their mates are well-fed increases the likely number of offspring. Female spiders weave silk egg-cases, each of which may contain hundreds of eggs; the spiders then hatch as apparently miniature adults, although most are incapable of feeding until after their first molt. Females of many species care for their young, for example by carrying them around or by sharing food with them. A minority of species are social, building communal webs that may house anywhere from a few to 50,000 individuals. Social behavior ranges from precarious toleration, as in the aggressive widow spiders, to co-operative hunting and food-sharing. Although most spiders live for at most two years, tarantulas and other mygalomorph spiders can live up to 25  years in captivity.

Spider-like arachnids with silk-producing spigots appear in the Devonian period about 386 million years ago, but these animals apparently lacked spinnerets. True spiders have been found in Carboniferous rocks from 318 to 299 million years ago, and are very similar to the most primitive surviving order, the Mesothelae. The main groups of modern spiders, Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae, first appear in the Triassic period, before 200 million years ago. After 130 million years ago fossil amber preserves details of spiders' anatomy and behavior, including mating, killing prey, producing silk and possibly caring for their young. In a few cases amber has preserved spiders' egg sacs and webs, occasionally with prey attached.

Contents

Description

Further information: Arthropod

Body plan

Spider anatomy:
(1) four pairs of legs
(2) cephalothorax
(3) opisthosoma
The Arthropod head problem[1]
A
L
L
L
L
L
L
x
C
P
L
L
L
L
Ci
A
A
Mnd
Mx
Mx
L
L
L
L
Tracheate
A
x
Mnd
Mx
Mx
L
L
L
L
    = acron
    = segments included in head
    = body segments
x = lost during development
    = compound eye
    = nephridia
O = nephridia lost during development
L = Leg
Ci = Chilarium
Mnd = Mandible
Mx = Maxilla
Arthropod head problem 01.png
The Arthropod head problem[1]

Spiders are chelicerates and therefore arthropods.[2] As arthropods they have: segmented bodies with jointed limbs, all covered in a cuticle made of chitin and proteins; heads that are composed of several segments that fuse during the development of the embryo.[3] Being chelicerates, their bodies consist of two tagmata, sets of segments that serve similar functions: the foremost one, called the cephalothorax or prosoma, is a complete fusion of the segments that in an insect would form two separate tagmata, the head and thorax; the rear tagma is called the abdomen or opisthosoma.[2] The pattern of segment fusion that forms chelicerates' heads is unique among arthropods, and what would normally be the first head segment disappears at an early stage of development, so that chelicerates lack the antennae typical of most arthropods. In fact chelicerates' only appendages ahead of the mouth are a pair of chelicerae, and they lack anything that would function directly as "jaws".[3][4] The first appendages behind the mouth are called pedipalps, and serve different functions within different groups of chelicerates.[2]

Spider's chelicera, showing the fang almost completely folded away.

Spiders and scorpions are members of one chelicerate group, the arachnids.[4] While scorpions' chelicerae are generally a modest pair of claws that they use in feeding,[5] spiders' terminate in fangs that are are generally venomous, and fold away behind the upper sections while not in use, while the upper sections generally have thick "beards" that filter solid lumps out of their food, as spiders can take only liquid food;[6] On the other hand scorpions' pedipalps generally form large claws for capturing prey,[5] while those of spiders are fairly small sensors whose bases also act as an extension of the mouth; in addition those of male spiders have enlarged last sections used for sperm transfer.[6]

In spiders the cephalothorax and abdomen are joined by a small, cylindrical pedicel, which enables the abdomen to move independently when producing silk. The upper surface of the cephalothorax is covered by a single, convex carapace while the underside is covered by two rather flat plates. The abdomen is soft and egg-shaped. It shows no sign of segmentation, except that the primitive Mesothelae, whose living members are the Liphistiidae, have segmented plates on the upper surface.[6]

Circulation and respiration

Basic arthropod body structure[7]
    = heart
    = gut
    = brain, nerve cord, ganglia
Arthropod body struct 01.png
Basic arthropod body structure[7]
Spider's main organs[8]
    Nervous system
    Digestive & excretory system
    Circulatory system
    Respiratory system
    Reproductive system
  1 Fang (chelicera)
  2 Venom gland
  3 Brain
  4 Pumping stomach
  5 Forward aorta branch
  6 Digestive cecum
  7 Heart
  8 Midgut
  9 Malphigian tubules
10 Cloacal chamber
11 Rear aorta
12 Spinneret
14 Trachea
15 Ovary (female)
16 Book lung
17 Nerve cord
18 Legs
Spider main organs labelled.png
Spider's main organs[8]

Like other arthropods, spiders are coelomates in which the coelom is reduced to small areas round the reproductive and excretory systems. Its place is largely taken by a hemocoel, a cavity that runs most of the length of the body and through which blood flows. The heart is a tube in the upper part of the body, with a few ostia that act as non-return valves allowing blood to enter the heart from the hemocoel but prevent it from leaving before it reaches the front end,[9] However in spiders it occupies only the upper part of the abdomen, and blood is discharged into the hemocoel by one artery that opens at the rear end of the abdomen and by branching arteries that pass through the pedicle and open into several parts of the cephalothorax. Hence spiders have open circulatory systems.[6] The blood of many spiders that have book lungs contains the respiratory pigment hemocyanin to make oxygen transport more efficient.[4]

Spiders have developed several different respiratory anatomies, based on book lungs, a tracheal system, or both. Mygalomorph and Mesothelae spiders have two pairs of book lungs filled with haemolymph, where openings on the ventral surface of the abdomen allow air to enter and diffuse oxygen. This is also the case for some basal araneomorph spiders like the family Hypochilidae, but the remaining members of this group have just the anterior pair of book lungs intact while the posterior pair of breathing organs are partly or fully modified into tracheae, through which oxygen is diffused into the haemolymph or directly to the tissue and organs.[6] The trachea system has most likely evolved in small ancestors to help resist desiccation.[4] The trachea were originally connected to the surroundings through a pair of openings called spiracles, but in the majority of spiders this pair of spiracles has fused into a single one in the middle, and moved backwards close to the spinnerets.[6] Spiders that have tracheae generally have higher metabolic rates and better water conservation.[10]

Feeding, digestion and excretion

A Xysticus sp. spider paralysing a fly

Uniquely among chelicerates, the final sections of spiders' chelicerae are fangs, and the great majority of spiders can use them to inject venom into prey from venom glands in the roots of the chelicerae.[6] Like most arachnids including scorpions,[4] spiders have a narrow gut that can only cope with liquid food and spiders have two sets of filters to keep solids out.[6] They use one of two different systems of external digestion. Some pump digestive enzymes from the midgut into the prey and then suck the liquified tissues of the prey into the gut, eventually leaving behind the empty husk of the prey. Others grind the prey to pulp using the chelicerae and the bases of the pedipalps, while flooding it with enzymes; in these species the chelicerae and the bases of the pedipalps form a preoral cavity that holds the food they are processing.[6]

The stomach in the cephalothorax acts as a pump that sends the food deeper into the digestive system. The mid gut bears many digestive ceca, compartments with no other exit, that extract nutrients from the food; most are in the abdomen, which is dominated by the digestive system, but a few are found in the cephalothorax.[6]

Most spiders convert nitrogenous waste products into uric acid, which can be excreted as a dry material. Malphigian tubules ("little tubes") extract these wastes from the blood in the hemocoel and dump them into the cloacal chamber, from which they are expelled through the anus.[6] Production of uric acid and its removal via Malphigian tubules are a water-conserving feature that has evolved independently in several arthropod lineages that can live far away from water,[11] for example the tubules of insects and arachnids develop from completely different parts of the embryo.[4] However a few primitive spiders, the sub-order Mesothelae and infra-order Mygalomorphae, retain the ancestral arthropod nephridia ("little kidneys"),[6] which use large amounts of water to excrete nitrogenous waste products as ammonia.[11]

Central nervous system

The basic arthropod central nervous system consists of: a pair of nerve cords running below the gut, with paired ganglia as local control centers in all segments; a brain formed by fusion of the ganglia for the head segments ahead of and behind the mouth, so that the esophagus is encircled by this conglomeration of ganglia.[12] Except for the primitive Mesothelae, of which the Liphistiidae are the sole surviving family, spiders have the much more centralized nervous system that is typical of archnids: all the ganglia of all segments behind the esophagus are fused, so that the cephalothorax is largely filled with nervous tissue and there are no ganglia in the abdomen;[12][4][6] in the Mesothelae, the ganglia of the abdomen and the rear part of the cephalothorax remain unfused.[10]

Sense organs

This jumping spider's main ocelli (center pair) are very acute. The outer pair are "secondary eyes" and there are other pairs of secondary eyes on the sides and top of its head.[13]

Most spiders have four pairs of eyes on the top-front area of the cephalothorax, arranged in patterns that vary from one family to another.[6] The pair at the front are of the type called pigment-cup ocelli ("little eyes"), which in most arthropods are only capable of detecting the direction from which light is coming, using the shadow cast by the walls of the cup. However the main eyes at the front of spiders' heads are pigment-cup ocelli that are capable of forming images.[13][14] The other eyes are thought to be derived from the compound eyes of the ancestral chelicerates, but no longer have the separate facets typical of compound eyes. Unlike the main eyes, in many spiders these secondary eyes detect light reflected from a reflective tapetum, and wolf spiders can be spotted by torch light reflected from the tapeta. On the other hand jumping spiders' secondary eyes have no tapeta.[6] Jumping spiders' visual acuity exceeds by a factor of ten that of dragonflies, which have by far the best vision among insects; in fact the human eye is only about fives times sharper than a jumping spider's. They achieve this by a telephoto-like series of lenses, a four-layer retina and the ability to swivel their eyes and integrate images from different stages in the scan. The downside is that the scanning and integrating processes are relatively slow.[15]

As with other arthropods, spider's cuticles would block out information about the outside world, except that they are penetrated by many sensors or connections from sensors to the nervous system. In fact spiders and other arthropods have modified their cuticles into elaborate arrays of sensors. Various touch sensors, mostly bristles called setae, respond to different levels of force, from strong contact to very weak air currents. Chemical sensors provide equivalents of taste and smell, often by means of setae.[13] Spider also have in the joints of their limbs slit sensors that detect vibration. In web-building spiders all these mechanical and chemical sensors are more important than the eyes, while the eyes are most important to spiders that hunt actively.[6]

Like most arthropods, spiders lack balance and acceleration sensors and rely on their eyes to tell them which way is up. Arthropods' proprioceptors, sensors that report the force exerted by muscles and the degree of bending in the body and joints, are well understood. On the other hand little is known about what other internal sensors spiders or other arthropods may have.[13]

Locomotion

Although all arthropods use muscles attached to the inside of the exoskeleton to flex their limbs, spiders and a few other groups still use hydraulic pressure to extend them, a system inherited from their pre-arthropod ancestors.[16] As a result a spider with a punctured cephalothorax cannot extend its legs, and the legs of dead spiders curl up.[6] Spiders can generate pressures up to eight times their resting level in order to extend their legs,[17] and jumping spiders can jump up to 50 times their own length by suddenly increasing the blood pressure in the third or fourth pair of legs.[6]

Most spiders that hunt actively, rather than relying on webs, have dense tufts of fine hairs between the paired claws at the tips of their legs. These tufts, known as scopulae, consist of bristles whose ends are split into as many as 1,000 branches, and enable spiders with scopulae to walk up vertical glass and upside down on ceilings. It appears that scopulae get their grip from contact with extremely thin layers of water on surfaces.[6] Spiders, like most other arachnids, keep at least four legs on the surface while walking or running.[18]

Silk production

An orb weaver producing silk from its spinnerets

The abdomen has no appendages except those that have been modified to form one to four (usually three) pairs of short, movable spinnerets, which emit silk. Each spinneret has many spigots, each of which is connected to one silk gland. There are at least six types of silk gland, each producing a different type of silk.[6]

Silk is mainly composed of a protein very similar to that used in insect silk. It is initially a liquid, and hardens not by exposure to air but as a result of being drawn out, which changes the internal structure of the protein.[19] It is similar in tensile strength to nylon and biological materials such as chitin, collagen and cellulose, but is much more elastic, in other words it can stretch much further before breaking or losing shape.[6]

Some spiders have a cribellum, a modified spinneret with up to 40,000 spigots, each of which produces a single very fine fiber. The fibers are pulled out by the calamistrum, a comb-like set of bristles on the jointed tip of the cribellum, and combined into a composite woolly thread that is very effective in snagging the bristles of insects. The earliest spiders had cribella, which produced the first silk capable of capturing insects, before spiders developed silk coated with sticky droplets. However most modern groups of spiders have lost the cribellum.[6]

Even species that do not build webs to catch prey use silk in several ways: as wrappers for sperm and for fertilized eggs; as a "safety rope"; for nest-building; and as "parachutes" by the young of some species.[6]

Reproduction and life cycle

Further information: Spider cannibalism
The tiny male of the Golden orb weaver (near the top of the leaf) is saved by producing the right vibrations in the web, and may be too small to be worth eating.

Spiders reproduce sexually and fertilization is internal but indirect, in other words the sperm is not inserted into the female's body by the male's genitals but by an intermediate stage. Unlike many land-living arthropods,[20] male spiders do not produce ready-made spermatophores (packages of sperm) but spin small sperm webs on to which they ejaculate and then transfer the sperm to syringe-like structures on the tips of their pedipalps. When a male detects signs of a female nearby he checks whether she is of the same species and whether she is ready to mate; for example in species that produce webs or "safety ropes", the male can identify the species and sex of these objects by "smell".[6]

Male jumping spider waving to a female.

Spiders generally use elaborate courtship rituals to prevent the large females from eating the small males before fertilization, except where the male is so much smaller that he is not worth eating. In web-weaving species precise patterns of vibrations in the web are a major part of the rituals, while patterns of touches on the female's body are important in many spiders that hunt actively, and may "hypnotize" the female. Gestures and dances by the male are important for jumping spiders, which have excellent eyesight. If courtship is successful, the male injects his sperm from the pedipalps into the female's genital opening, known as the epigyne, on the underside of her abdomen. Female's reproductive tracts vary from simple tubes to systems that include seminal receptacles in which females store sperm and release it when they are ready.[6]

Males of the genus Tidarren amputate one of their palps before maturation and enter adult life with one palp only. The palps are 20% of male's body mass in this species, and detaching one of the two improves mobility. In the Yemeni species Tidarren argo, the remaining palp is then torn off by the female. The separated palp remains attached to the female's epigynum for about four hours and apparently continues to function independently. In the meantime the female feeds on the palpless male.[21] In over 60% of cases the female of the Australian redback spider kills and eats the male after it inserts its second palp into the female's genital opening; in fact the males co-operate by trying to impale themselves on the females' fangs. Observation shows that most male redbacks never get an opportunity to mate, and the "lucky" ones increase the likely number of offspring by ensuring that the females are well-fed.[22] However males of most species survive a few matings, limited mainly by their short life spans. Some even live for a while in their mates' webs.[23]

The cast-off exuvia of a spider after molting.

Females lay up to 3,000 eggs in one or more silk egg sacs,[6] which maintain a fairly constant humidity level.[23] In some species the females die afterwards, but females of other species protect the sacs by attaching them to their webs, hiding them in nests, carrying them in the chelicerae or attaching them to the spinnerets and dragging them along.[6]

Baby spiders pass all their larval stages inside the egg and hatch as spiderlings, very small and sexually immature but similar in shape to adults. Some spiders care for their young, for example a wolf spider's brood cling to rough bristles on the mother's back,[6] and females of some species respond to the "begging" behaviour of their young by giving them their prey, provided it is no longer struggling, or even regurgitate food.[23]

Like other arthropods, spiders have to molt in order to grow as their cuticles ("skins") cannot stretch.[24] In some species males mate with newly-molted females, which are too weak to be dangerous to the males.[23] Most spiders live for only one to two years, although some tarantulas have lived in captivity for up to 25 years.[6]

Egg-case of a spider
Burrowing wolf spider defending its egg sac
Gasteracantha mammosa spiderlings next to their eggs capsule

Size

Spiders occur in a large range of sizes. The smallest, dwarf spiders of the subfamily Erigoninae, are less than 1 mm (about .05 inches) in body length. The largest and heaviest spiders occur among tarantulas, which can have body lengths up to 90 mm (about 3.5 inches) and leg spans up to 250 mm (about 10 inches).[25]

Coloration

Only three classes of pigment (ommochromes, bilins and guanine) have been identified in spiders, although other pigments have been detected but not yet characterized. Melanins, carotenoids and pterins, very common in other animals, are apparently absent. In some species the exocuticle of the legs and prosoma is modified by a tanning process, resulting in brown coloration.[26] Bilins are found for example in Micrommata virescens, resulting in its green color. Guanine is responsible for the white markings of the European garden spider Araneus diadematus. It is in many species accumulated in specialized cells called guanocytes. In genera such as Tetragnatha, Leucauge, Argyrodes or Theridiosoma, guanine creates their silvery appearance. While guanine is originally an end-product of protein metabolism, its excretion can be blocked in spiders, leading to an increase in its storage.[26] Structural colors occur in some species, which are the result of the diffraction, scattering or interference of light, for example by modified setae or scales. The white prosoma of Argiope results from hairs reflecting the light, Lycosa and Josa both have areas of modified cuticle that act as light reflectors.[26]

Ecology and behavior

Non-predatory feeding

Although spiders are generally regarded as predatory, the jumping spider Bagheera kiplingi gets over 90% of its food from fairly solid plant material produced by acacias as part of a mutually beneficial relationship with a species of ant.[27]

Juveniles of some spiders in the families Anyphaenidae, Corinnidae, Clubionidae, Thomisidae and Salticidae feed on plant nectar. Laboratory studies show that they do so deliberately and over extended periods, and periodically clean themselves while feeding. These spiders also prefer sugar solutions to plain water, which indicates that they are seeking nutrients. Since many spiders are nocturnal, the extent of nectar consumption by spiders may have been under-estimated. Nectar contains amino acids, lipids, vitamins and minerals in addition to sugars, and studies have shown that other spider species live longer when nectar is available. Feeding on nectar avoids the risks of struggles with prey, and the costs of producing venom and digestive enzymes.[28]

Various species are known to to feed on dead arthropods (scavenging), web silk, and their own shed exoskeletons. Pollen caught in webs may also be eaten, and studies have shown that young spiders have a better chance of survival if they have the opportunity to eat pollen. In captivity, several spider species are also known to feed on bananas, marmalade, milk, egg yolk and sausages.[28] In one praying mantis species, juveniles also actively feed on pollen and adults that capture pollen-laden insects eat the pollen as well.[29]

Methods of capturing prey

Main article: Spider web
This spider's web serves both as a trap and as a way of making its home in a leaf.

The best-known method of prey capture is by means of sticky webs. Varying placement of webs allows different species of spider to trap different insects in the same area, for example flat horizontal webs trap insects that fly up from vegetation underneath while flat vertical webs trap insects in horizontal flight. Web-building spiders have poor vision, but are extremely sensitive to vibrations.[6]

Females of the water spider Argyroneta aquatica build underwater "diving bell" webs which they fill with air and use for digesting prey, molting, mating and raising offspring. They live almost entirely within the bells, darting out to catch prey animals that touch the bell or the threads that anchor it. [30] A few spiders use the surfaces of lakes and ponds as "webs", detecting trapped insects by the vibrations that these cause while struggling.[6]

Net-casting spiders weave only small webs but then manipulate them to trap prey. Those of the genus Hyptiotes and the family Theridiosomatidae stretch their webs and then release them when prey strike them, but do not actively move their webs. Those of the family Deinopidae weave even smaller webs, hold them outstretched between their first two pairs of legs, and lunge and push the webs as much as twice their own body length to trap prey, and this move may increase the webs' area by a factor of up to ten. Experiments have shown that Deinopis spinosus has two different techniques for trapping prey: backwards strikes to catch flying insects, whose vibrations it detects; and forward strikes to catch ground-walking prey that it sees. These two techniques have also been observed in other deinopids. Walking insects form most of the prey of most deinopids, but one population of Deinopis subrufus appears to live mainly on tipulid flies that they catch with the backwards strike.[31]

Mature female bolas spiders of the genus Mastophora build "webs" that consist of only a single "trapeze line", which they patrol. They also construct a bolas made of a single thread, tipped with a large ball of very wet sticky silk. They emit chemicals that resemble the pheromones of moths, and then swing the bolas at the moths. Although they miss on about 50% of strikes, they catch about the same weight of insects per night as web-weaving spiders of similar size. The spiders eat the bolas if they have not made a kill in about 30 minutes, rest for a while, and then make new bolas.[32][33] Juveniles and adult males are much smaller and do not make bolas. Instead they release different pheromones that attract moth flies, and catch them with their front pairs of legs.[34]

Trapdoor spider (family: Ctenizidae), an ambush predator.

The primitive Liphistiidae, the "trapdoor spiders" (family Ctenizidae) and many tarantulas are ambush predators that lurk in burrows, often closed by trapdoors and often surrounded by networks of silk threads that alert these spiders to the presence of prey.[10] Other ambush predators do without such aids, including many crab spiders,[6] and a few species that prey on bees, which see ultraviolet, can adjust their ultraviolet reflectance to match the flowers in which they are lurking.[26] Wolf spiders, jumping spiders, fishing spiders and some crab spiders capture prey by chasing it, and rely mainly on vision to locate prey.[6]

Portia uses both webs and cunning, versatile tactics to overcome prey.[35]

Some jumping spiders of the genus Portia hunt other spiders in ways that seem intelligent,[15] outflanking their victims or luring them from their webs. Laboratory studies show that Portia's instinctive tactics are only starting points for a trial-and-error approach from which these spiders learn very quickly how to overcome new prey species.[35] However they seem to be relatively slow "thinkers", which is not surprising as their brains are vastly smaller than those of mammalian predators.[15]

An ant-mimicking jumping spider

Ant-mimicking spiders face several challenges: they generally develop slimmer abdomens and false "waists" in the cephalothorax to mimic the three distinct regions (tagmata) of an ant's body; they wave the first pair of legs in form to their heads to mimic antennae, which spiders lack, and to conceal the fact that they have but eight legs rather than six; they develop large color patches round one pair of eyes to disguise the fact that they generally have eight simple eyes, while ants have two compound eyes; they cover their bodies with reflective hairs to resemble the shiny bodies of ants. In some spider species males and females mimic different ant species, as female spiders are usually much larger than males. Ant-mimicking spiders also modify their behavior to resemble that of the target species of ant, for example many adopt a zig-zag pattern of movement, ant-mimicking jumping spiders avoid jumping, and spiders of the genus Synemosyna walk on the outer edges of leaves in the same way as Pseudomyrmex. Ant-mimicry in many spiders and other arthropods may be for protection from predators that hunt by sight, including birds, lizards and spiders. However several ant-mimicking spiders prey either on ants or on the ants "livestock" such as aphids. When at rest the ant-mimicking crab spider Amyciaea does not closely resemble Oecophylla, but while hunting it imitates the behavior of a dying ant to attract worker ants. After a kill some ant-mimicking spiders hold their victims between themselves and large groups of ants to avoid being attacked.[36]

Defense

Urticating hairs reflecting on the back of a young Chilean rose tarantula (Grammostola rosea)

There is strong evidence that spiders' coloration is camouflage that helps them to evade their major predators, birds and parasitic wasps, both of which have good color vision. Many spider species are colored so as to merge with their most common backgrounds, and some have disruptive coloration, stripes and blotches that break up their outlines. In a few species, such as the Hawaiian happy-face spider, Theridion grallator, several coloration schemes are present in a ratio that appears to remain constant, and this may make it more difficult for predators to recognize the species. Most spiders are insufficiently dangerous or unpleasant-tasting for warning coloration to offer much benefit. However a few species with powerful venoms, large jaws or irritant hairs have patches of warning colors, and some actively display these colors when threatened.[26][37]

Many of the family Theraphosidae, which includes tarantulas and baboon spiders, have urticating hairs on their abdomens and use their legs to flick them at attackers. These hairs are fine setae (bristles) with fragile bases and a row of barbs on the tip. The barbs cause intense irritation but there is no evidence that they carry any kind of venom.[38] A few defend themselves against wasps by including networks of very robust threads in their webs, giving the spider time to flee while the wasps are struggling with the obstacles.[39] The golden wheeling spider Carparachne aureoflava of the Namibian desert escapes parasitic wasps by flipping onto its side and cartwheeling down sand dunes.[40]

Social spiders

Main article: Social spider

A few species of spiders that build webs live together in large colonies and show social behavior, although not as complex as in social insects. Anelosimus eximius (in the family Theridiidae) can form colonies of up to 50,000 individuals.[41] The genus Anelosimus has a strong tendency towards sociality: all known American species are social, and species in Madagascar are at least somewhat social.[42] Members of other species in the same family but several different genera have independently developed social behavior. For example although Theridion nigroannulatum belongs to a genus with no other social species, T. nigroannulatum build colonies thay may contain several thousand individuals that co-operate in prey capture and share food.[43] Other communal spiders include several Philoponella species (family Uloboridae), Agelena consociata (family Agelenidae) and Mallos gregalis (family Dictynidae).[44] Social predatory spiders need to defend their prey against kleptoparasites ("thieves"), and larger colonies are more successful in this.[45] The vegetarian spider Bagheera kiplingi lives in small colonies which help to protect eggs and spiderlings.[27] Even widow spiders (genus Latrodectus), which are notoriously aggressive and cannibalistic, have formed small colonies in captivity, sharing webs and feeding together.[46]

Web types

Main article: Spider web

There is no consistent relationship between the classification of spiders and the types of web they build: species in the same genera may build very similar or significantly different webs. Not is there much correspondence between spiders' classification and the chemical composition of their silks. Convergent evolution in web construction, in other words use of similar techniques by remotely-related species, is "rampant". Non-orb web designs and the spinning behaviors that produce them have received very little attention from arachnologists, despite the fact that the majority of spiders build non-orb webs. The basic radial-then-spiral sequence visible in orb webs and the "sense of direction" required to build them may have been inherited from the common ancestors of most spider groups.[47] It used to be thought that the sticky orb web was an evolutionary innovation resulting in the diversification of the Orbiculariae. Now, however, it appears that non-orb spiders are a sub-group that evolved from orb-web spiders, and non-orb spiders have over 40% more spieces and are four times as abundant as orb-web spiders. Their greater success may be due to the fact that sphecid wasps, which are often the dominant predators on spiders, much prefer to attack spiders with flat webs.[48]

Orb webs

Nephila clavata, a golden orb weaver

About half the potential prey that hit orb webs escape. A web has to perform three functions: interception the prey (intersection); absorbing its momentum without breaking (stopping); and trapping the prey by entangling it or sticking to it (retention). No single design is best for all prey. For example: wider spacing of lines will increase the web's area and hence its ability to intercept prey, but reduce its stopping power and retention; closer spacing, larger sticky droplets and thicker lines would improve retention, but would make it easier for potential prey to see and avoid the web,at least during the day. However there are no consistent differences between orb webs built for use during the day and those built for use at night. In fact there is no simple relationship between orb web design features and they prey they capture, as each orb-weaving species takes a wide range of prey.[47]

The hubs of orb webs, where the spiders lurk, are usually above the center as the spiders can move downwards faster than upwards. If there is an obvious direction in which the spider can retreat to avoid its own predators, the hub is usually offset towards that direction.[47]

Horizontal orb webs are fairly common, despite being less effective at intercepting and retaining prey and more vulnerable to damage by rain and falling debris. Various researchers have suggested that horizontal webs offer compensating advantages, such as: reduced vulnerability to wind damage; reduced visibility to prey flying upwards, because of the back-lighting from the sky; enabling oscillations to catch insects in slow horizontal flight. However there is no single explanation for the common use of horizontal orb webs.[47]

Spiders often attach highly visible silk bands called decorations or stabilimenta to their webs. Field research suggests that webs with more decorative bands captured more prey per hour.[49] However a laboratory study showed that spiders reduce the building of these decorations if they sense the presence of predators.[50]

There are several unusual variants of orb web, many of them convergently evolved, including: attachment of line to the surface of water, possibly to trap insects in or on the surface; webs with twigs through their centers, possibly to hide the spiders from predators; "ladder-like" webs that appear most effective in catching moths. However the significance of many variations is unclear.[47]

In 1973, Skylab 3 took two orb-web spiders into space to test their web-spinning capabilities in zero gravity. At first both produced rather sloppy webs, but they adapted quickly.[51]

Tangleweb / cobweb spiders

Members of the family Theridiidae weave irregular, tangled, three-dimensional webs, popularly known as cobwebs.There seems to be an evolutionary trend towards a reduction in the amount of sticky silk used, leading to its total absence in some species. The construction of cobwebs is less sterotyped than that of orb-webs, and may take several days.[48]

Other types of webs

The Linyphiidae generally make horizontal but uneven sheets, with tangles of stopping threads above. Insects that hit the stopping threads fall on to the sheet or are shaken on to it by the spider, and are held by sticky threads on the sheet until the spider can attack from below.[52]

Evolution

Main article: Spider evolution

Fossil record

Spider preserved in amber

Spider fossils are rare because spiders' bodies are very soft. The oldest known amber that contains fossil arthropods dates from 130 million years ago in the Early Cretaceous period. In addition to preserving spiders' anatomy in very fine detail, pieces of amber show spiders mating, killing prey, producing silk and possibly caring for their young. In a few cases amber has preserved spiders' egg sacs and webs, occasionally with prey attached;[53] the oldest fossil web found so far is 100 million years old.[54] Earlier spider fossils come from a few lagerstätten, places where conditions were exceptionally suited to preserving fairly soft tissues.[53]

Palaeotarbus jerami, a trigonotarbid and the oldest known arachnid

The oldest known arachnid is the trigonotarbid Palaeotarbus jerami, from about 420 million years ago in the Silurian period, and had a triangular cephalothorax and segmented abdomen, as well as eight legs and a pair of pedipalps.[55] Attercopus fimbriunguis, from 386 million years ago in the Devonian period, bears the earliest known silk-producing spigots, and was therefore hailed as a spider.[56] However these spigots may have been mounted on the underside of the abdomen rather than on spinnerets, which are modified appendages and whose mobility is important in the building of webs. Hence Attercopus and the similar Permian archnid Permarachne may not have been true spiders, and probably used silk for lining nests or producing egg-cases rather than for building webs.[57]

Chelicerata

Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs)




Eurypterida



Chasmataspidida



Arachnida


Scorpiones



Opiliones (harvestmen)





Pseudoscorpiones



Solifugae (sun spiders)




Palpigradi (microwhip scorpions)




Trigonotarbida




Araneae (spiders)




Haptopoda




Amblypygi (whip spiders)




Thelyphonida (whip scorpions)



Schizomida









Ricinulei (hooded tickspiders)



Anactinotrichida



Acariformes (mites)





Shultz (2007)'s evolutionary family tree of arachnids[58] marks extinct groups.

Several Carboniferous spiders were members of the Mesothelae, a primitive group now represented only by the Liphistiidae.[56] The mesothelid Paleothele montceauensis, from the Late Carboniferous over 299 million years ago, had five spinnerets.[59] Although the Permian period 299 to 251 million years ago saw rapid diversification of flying insects, there are very few fossil spiders from this period.[56]

A funnel web.

The main groups of modern spiders, Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae, first appear in the Triassic well before 200 million years ago. Some Triassic mygalomorphs appear to be members of the family Hexathelidae, whose modern members include the notorious Sydney funnel-web spider, and their spinnerets appear adapted for building funnel-shaped webs to to catch jumping insects. Araneomorphae account for the great majority of modern spiders, including those that weave the familiar orb-shaped webs. The Jurassic and Cretaceous periods provide a large number of fossil spiders, including representatives of many modern families.[56]

Family tree

It is now agreed that spiders (Araneae) are monophyletic, in other words members of a group that contains a common ancestor plus all and only its descendants.[60] There has been debate about what are their closest evolutionary relatives and how all of these evolved from the ancestral chelicerates, which were marine animals. The cladogram on the right is based on J.W. Shultz' analysis (2007). Other views include proposals that: scorpions are more closely related to the extinct marine scorpion-like eurypterids than to spiders; spiders and Amblypygi are a monopyhletic group. The appearance of several multi-way branchings in the tree on the right shows that there are still uncertainties about relationships between the groups involved.[60]

Arachnids lack some features of other checlicerates, including backward-pointing mouths and gnathobases ("jaw bases") at the bases of their legs;[60] both of these features are part of the ancestral arthropod feeding system.[61] Instead they have mouths that point forwards and downwards, and all have some means of breathing air.[60] Spiders (Araneae) are distinguished from other arachnid groups by several characteristics, including spinnerets and, in males, pedipalps that are specially adapted for sperm transfer.[62]

Taxonomy

Main articles: Spider taxonomy and Spider diversity

Spiders are divided into three sub-orders, Mesothelae, Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae; the last two are often grouped under the name Opisthothelae. Almost 40,000 living species of spiders (order Araneae) have been identified and are currently grouped into about 110 families and about 3,500 genera by arachnologists.[62]

  Spider diversity[62] Features
Sub-order Species Genera Families Segmented plates on top of abdomen[63] Ganglia in abdomen Spinnerets[63] Striking direction of fangs[6]
Mesothelae 85 2 1 Yes Yes Four or more pairs under middle of abdomen Downwards and forwards
Mygalomorphae 2,500 300 15 No No Two or three pairs under rear of abdomen
Araneomorphae 36,000 3,200 94 From sides to center, like pincers

Mesothelae

Main article: Mesothelae
Ryuthela secundaria, a member of the Liphistiidae[64]

The only living members of the primitive Mesothelae are the family Liphistiidae, found only in Southeast Asia, China, and Japan.[62] Most of the Liphistiidae construct silk-lined burrows with thin trapdoors, although some species of the genus Liphistius build camouflaged silk tubes with a second trapdoor as an emergency exit. Members of the genus Liphistius run silk "tripwires" outwards from their tunnels to help them detect approaching prey, while those of genus Heptathela do not and instead rely on their built-in vibration sensors.[65] Spiders of the genus Heptathela have no venom glands.[66]

The extinct families Arthrolycosidae, found in Carboniferous and Permian rocks, and Arthromygalidae, so far found only in Carboniferous rocks, have been classified as members of the Mesothelae.[67]

Mygalomorphae

A Mexican red-kneed tarantula Brachypelma smithi
Main article: Mygalomorphae

The Mygalomorphae, which first appeared in the Triassic period,[56] are generally heavily-built and hairy, with large, robust chelicerae and fangs.[62] Well-known examples include tarantulas, trapdoor spiders and the Australasian funnel-web spiders.[6] Most spend the majority of their time in burrows, and some run silk tripwires out from these, but a few build webs to capture prey. However mygalomorphs cannot produce the pirifom silk that the Araneomorphae use as instant adhesive to glue silk to surfaces or to other strands of silk, and this makes web construction more difficult for mygalomorphs. Since mygalomorphs rarely "balloon" by using air currents for transport, their populations often form clummps.[62] In addition to arthropods, mygalomorphs prey on frogs and lizards, and snails.[68]

Araneomorphae

Main article: Araneomorphae
The pincer-like fangs of an araneomorph

In addition to accounting for over 90% of spider species, the Araneomorphae have the most diverse lifestyles as they include orb-web spiders, the cursorial wolf spiders, and jumping spiders, [62] as well as the only known vegetarian spider.[27]

Spiders and people

Spider bites

Threat display by an Sydney funnel-web spider (Atrax robustus).
Brazilian wandering spider (Phoneutria nigriventer)
Main article: Spider bite

Most spiders will only bite humans in self-defense, and few produce worse effects than a mosquito bite or bee-sting.[69] Most of those with medically serious bites, such as recluse spiders and widow spiders, are shy and bite only when they feel threatened, although this can easily arise by accident.[70][71] Funnel web spiders' defensive tactics are aggressive, although they rarely inject much venom.[72] On the other hand the Brazilian wandering spider requires very little provocation.[73] There were about 100 reliably reported deaths from spider bites in the 20th century,[74] but about 1,500 from jellyfish stings.[75] Many alleged cases of spider bites may represent incorrect diagnoses,[76] which would make it more difficult to check the effectiveness of treatments for genuine bites.[77]

Benefits to humans

Fried spiders at a Cambodian market

Cooked tarantula spiders are considered a delicacy in Cambodia,[78] and by the Piaroa Indians of southern Venezuela – provided the highly irritant hairs, the spiders' main defense system, are removed first.[79]

Spider venoms may be a less polluting alternative to conventional pesticides as they are deadly to insects but the great majority are harmless to vertebrates. Australian funnel web spiders are a promising source as most of the world's insect pests have had no opportunity to develop any immunity to their venom, and funnel web spiders thrive in captivity and are easy to "milk". It may be possible to target specific pests by engineering genes for the production of spider toxins into viruses that infect species such as cotton bollworms.[80]

Possible medical uses for spider venoms are being investigated, for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia,[81] Alzheimer's disease,[82] strokes,[83] and erectile dysfunction.[84]

Because spider silk is both light and very strong, attempts are being made to produce it in goats' milk and in the leaves of plants, by means of genetic engineering.[85] [86]

Arachnophobia

Main article: Arachnophobia

Arachnophobia is a specific phobia, an abnormal fear of spiders or anything reminiscent of spiders, such as webs or spider-like shapes. It may be an exaggerated form of an instinctive response that helped early humans to survive,[87] or perhaps a cultural phenomenon that is most common in predominantly European societies.[88]

Arachnophobia is also the title of a 1990 film, as well as a spin-off video game, in which fictitious deadly spiders overrun a small California town.[89][90]

Spiders in symbolism and culture

Precolumbian spider image from a conch shell gorget at the Great Mound at Spiro, Oklahoma.
Moche Ceramic Depicting Spider. 300 A.D.

Spiders have been the focus of fears, stories and mythologies of various cultures for centuries.[91] They have symbolized patience due to their hunting technique of setting webs and waiting for prey, as well as mischief and malice for the painful death their venom causes.[92] Web-spinning also caused the association of the spider with creation myths as they seem to have the ability to produce their own worlds.[93]The Moche people of ancient Peru worshipped nature.[94] They placed emphasis on animals and often depicted spiders in their art.[95]

See also

Footnotes

  1. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. p. 520. ISBN 0030259827. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 554–555. ISBN 0030259827. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 518–522. ISBN 0030259827. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 559–564. ISBN 0030259827. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 565–569. ISBN 0030259827. 
  6. 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 6.19 6.20 6.21 6.22 6.23 6.24 6.25 6.26 6.27 6.28 6.29 6.30 6.31 6.32 6.33 6.34 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 571–584. ISBN 0030259827. 
  7. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 523-524. ISBN 0030259827. 
  8. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 571-584. ISBN 0030259827. 
  9. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 527–528. ISBN 0030259827. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Coddington, J.A. & Levi, H.W. (1991). "Systematics and Evolution of Spiders (Araneae)". Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 565–592. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.003025. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 529–530. ISBN 0030259827. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 531–532. ISBN 0030259827. 
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 532–537. ISBN 0030259827. 
  14. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 578–580. ISBN 0030259827. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Harland, D.P., and Jackson, R.R. (2000). "PDF “Eight-legged cats” and how they see - a review of recent research on jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)". Cimbebasia 16: 231–240. http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/ccnr/Papers/Downloads/Harland_Cimb2000.pdf PDF. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  16. Barnes, R.S.K., Calow, P., Olive, P., Golding, D., and Spicer, J. (2001). "Invertebrates with Legs: the Arthropods and Similar Groups". The Invertebrates: A Synthesis. Blackwell Publishing. p. 168. ISBN 0632047615. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TBMsbe9efPgC&pg=PA168&dq=arthropod+hydraulic&sig=ACfU3U2CPJ_K9DDSTNMoj97Mutbl8DFLgg. Retrieved on 2008-09-25. 
  17. Parry, D.A., and Brown, R.H.J. (1959). "The Hydraulic Mechanism of the Spider Leg" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology 36: 423–433. http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/36/2/423.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-09-25. 
  18. Anderson, D.T. (2001), "The Chelicerata", in Anderson, D.T., Invertebrate Zoology (2 ed.), Oxford University Press, pp. 325–349, ISBN 0195513681 
  19. Vollrath, F., and Knight, D.P. (March 2001). "Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk". Nature 410: 541–548. doi:10.1038/35069000. 
  20. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 537–539. ISBN 0030259827. 
  21. Knoflach, B. & van Harten, A. (2001). "Tidarren argo sp. nov (Araneae: Theridiidae) and its exceptional copulatory behaviour: emasculation, male palpal organ as a mating plug and sexual cannibalism". Journal of Zoology 254: 449–459. doi:10.1017/S0952836901000954. 
  22. Andrade, Maydianne C.B. (2003). "Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders". Behavioral Ecology 14: 531–538. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg015. 
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 Foelix, R.F. (1996). "Reproduction". Biology of Spiders. Oxford University Press US. pp. 176–212. ISBN 0195095944. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XUgyqxNKhyAC&dq=%22Biology+of+Spiders%22+Foelix&pg=PP1&ots=Ch4j60g2pL&sig=42rE8UvdN74f4pcxzWLAniivNaY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result#PPA176,M1. Retrieved on 2008-10-08. 
  24. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 523–524. ISBN 0030259827. 
  25. Spiders and their Kin, Herbert W. Levi and Lorna R. Levi, Golden Press, p. 20 and p. 44
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 Oxford, G.S. & Gillespie, R.G. (1998). Evolution and Ecology of Spider Coloration. Annual Review of Entomology 43:619-643. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.619
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 Meehan, C,J. Olson, E.J. and Curry, R.L. (21 August 2008), Exploitation of the Pseudomyrmex–Acacia mutualism by a predominantly vegetarian jumping spider (Bagheera kiplingi), http://eco.confex.com/eco/2008/techprogram/P12401.HTM, retrieved on 2008-10-10 
  28. 28.0 28.1 Jackson, R.R. et al. (2001). "Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) that feed on nectar" (PDF). J. Zool. Lond. 255: 25–29. doi:10.1017/S095283690100108X. http://xnelson.googlepages.com/Jacksonetal2001.pdf. 
  29. Beckman, N. and Hurd, L.E. (August 2003). "Pollen Feeding and Fitness in Praying Mantids: The Vegetarian Side of a Tritrophic Predator". Environmental Entomology 32 (4): 881–885. doi:10.1603/0046-225X(2003)032[0881:PFAFIP]2.0.CO;2. 
  30. Schütz, D., and Taborsky, M. (2003). "Adaptations to an aquatic life may be responsible for the reversed sexual size dimorphism in the water spider, Argyroneta aquatica" (PDF). Evolutionary Ecology Research 5 (1): 105–117. http://www.zoology.unibe.ch/behav/pdf_files/Schuetz_EvolEcolRes03.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  31. Coddington, J., and Sobrevila, C. (1987). "Web manipulation and two stereotyped attack behaviors in the ogre-faced spider Deinopis spinosus Marx (Araneae, Deinopidae)." (PDF). Journal of Arachnology 15: 213–225. http://www.americanarachnology.org/JoA_free/JoA_v15_n2/JoA_v15_p213.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  32. Eberhard, W.G. (December 1977). "Aggressive Chemical Mimicry by a Bolas Spider" (PDF). Science 198 (4322): 1173–1175. doi:10.1126/science.198.4322.1173. http://striweb.si.edu/publications/PDFs/Eberhard_Agreessive%20chemical%20mimicry.Science.1977.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-10. 
  33. Eberhard, W.G. (1980). "The Natural History and Behavior of the Bolas Spider, Mastophora dizzydeani sp. n. (Araneae)". Psyche 87: 143–170. http://psyche.entclub.org/87/87-143.html. Retrieved on 2008-10-10. 
  34. Yeargan, K.V., and Quate, L.W. (1997). "Adult male bolas spiders retain juvenile hunting tactics". Oecologia 112 (4): 572–576. doi:10.1007/s004420050347. 
  35. 35.0 35.1 Wilcox, S. and Jackson, R. (2002). "Jumping Spider Tricksters". in Bekoff, M., Allen, C., and Burghardt, G.M.. The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition. MIT Press. pp. 27–34. ISBN 0262523221. 
  36. Mclver, J.D. and Stonedahl, G. (January 1993). "Myrmecomorphy: Morphological and Behavioral Mimicry of Ants". Annual Review of Entomology 38: 351–377. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.002031. 
  37. "Different smiles, single species". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved on 2008-10-10.
  38. Cooke, J.A.L., Roth, V.D., and Miller, F.H.. "The urticating hairs of theraphosid spiders". American Museum novitates (American Museum of Natural History) (2498). http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/2705. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  39. Blackledge, T.A., and Wenzel, J.W. (2001). "Silk Mediated Defense by an Orb Web Spider against Predatory Mud-dauber Wasps". Behaviour 138 (2): 155–171. doi:10.1163/15685390151074357. 
  40. Armstrong, S. (14 July 1990). "Fog, wind and heat - life in the Namib desert". New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12717253.800-fog-wind-and-heat--life-in-the-namib-desert-researchersworking-in-one-of-the-worlds-most-hostile-environments-are-discoveringhowscores-of-species-manage-to-survive-but-will-the-research-station-itselfsurvive-as-namibia-gains-its-independence-.html. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  41. Vollrath, F. (1986). "Eusociality and extraordinary sex ratios in the spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18 (4): 283–287. ISSN 0340-5443. 
  42. Agnarsson, I., and Kuntner, M. (April 2005). "Madagascar: an unexpected hotspot of social Anelosimus spider diversity (Araneae: Theridiidae)". Systematic Entomology 30 (4): 575–592. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.2005.00289.x. 
  43. Avilés, L., Maddison, W.P. and Agnarsson, I. (August 2006). "A New Independently Derived Social Spider with Explosive Colony Proliferation and a Female Size Dimorphism". Biotropica 38 (6): 743–753. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00202.x. 
  44. Matsumoto, T. (1998). "Cooperative prey capture in the communal web spider, Philoponella raffray (Araneae, Uloboridae)" (PDF). Journal of Arachnology 26: 392–396. http://www.americanarachnology.org/JoA_free/JoA_v26_n3/JoA_v26_p392.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  45. Cangialosi, K.R. (July 1990). "Social spider defense against kleptoparasitism". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27 (1). doi:10.1007/BF00183313. 
  46. Bertani, R., Fukushima, C.S., and Martins, R. (May 2008). "Sociable widow spiders? Evidence of subsociality in LatrodectusWalckenaer, 1805 (Araneae, Theridiidae)". Journal of Ethology 26 (2). doi:10.1007/s10164-007-0082-8. 
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 Eberhard, W.G. (1990). "Function and Phylogeny of Spider Webs" (PDF). Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 21: 341–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002013. http://striweb.si.edu/publications/PDFs/Eberhard_Function%20and%20Phylogeny%20of.Annual%20Review%20of%20Ecology%20and%20Syst.1990.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-15. 
  48. 48.0 48.1 Agnarsson, I. (2004). "Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 141 (4): 447–626. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00120.x. 
  49. Herberstein, M.E. (2). Australian Journal of Zoology. 48. pp. 217–223. doi:10.1071/ZO00007. 
  50. Li, D., and Lee, W.S. (February 2004). "Predator-induced plasticity in web-building behaviour". Animal Behaviour 67 (2): 309–318. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.011. 
  51. Thomson, Peggy and Park, Edwards. "Odd Tales from the Smithsonian". Retrieved on 2008-07-21.
  52. Schütt, K. (1995). "Drapetisca socialis (Araneae: Linyphiidae): Web reduction - ethological and morphological adaptations" (PDF). European Journal of Entomology 92: 553–563. http://www.eje.cz/pdfarticles/599/eje_092_3_553_Schutt.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-19. 
  53. 53.0 53.1 Penney, D., and Selden, P.A. (2007). "Spinning with the dinosaurs: the fossil record of spiders". Geology Today 23 (6): 231–237. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2451.2007.00641.x. 
  54. Hecht, H.. "Oldest spider web found in amber". New Scientist. Retrieved on 2008-10-15.
  55. Dunlop, J.A. (September 1996). "A trigonotarbid arachnid from the Upper Silurian of Shropshire" (PDF). Palaeontology 39 (3): 605–614. http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2039/Pages%20605-614.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-12.  The fossil was originally named Eotarbus but was renamed when it was realized that a Carboniferous arachnid had already been named Eotarbus: Dunlop, J.A.. "A replacement name for the trigonotarbid arachnid Eotarbus Dunlop". Palaeontology 42 (1): 191. 
  56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 56.3 56.4 Vollrath, F., and Selden, P.A. (December 2007). "The Role of Behavior in the Evolution of Spiders, Silks, and Webs" (PDF). Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 819–846. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110221. http://homepage.mac.com/paulselden/Sites/Website/ARES.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-12. 
  57. Selden, P.A., and Shear, W.A. (July 2008). "Fossil evidence for the origin of spider spinnerets" (PDF). Nature Precedings. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2088/version/1/files/npre20082088-1.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-12. 
  58. Schultz, J.W. (2007). "A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150: 221–265. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00284.x. 
  59. Selden, P.A. (February 1996). "Fossil mesothele spiders". Nature 379: 498–499. doi:10.1038/379498b0. 
  60. 60.0 60.1 60.2 60.3 Shultz, J.W. (2007). "A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150: 221–265. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00284.x. 
  61. Gould, S.J. (1990). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. Hutchinson Radius. p. 105. ISBN 0091742714. 
  62. 62.0 62.1 62.2 62.3 62.4 62.5 62.6 Coddington, J.A. (2005). "Phylogeny and Classification of Spiders". in Ubick, D., Paquin, P., Cushing, P.E., and Roth, V. (PDF). Spiders of North America: an identification manual. American Arachnological Society. pp. 18–24. ISBN 0977143902. http://si-pddr.si.edu/dspace/bitstream/10088/4365/1/CoddingtonSNAPhylogeny05.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-12. 
  63. 63.0 63.1 Leroy, J, and Leroy, A. (2003). "How spiders function". Spiders of Southern Africa. Struik. pp. 15–21. ISBN 1868729443. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zgxfRnYbiYcC&dq=mesothelae+venom+spinnerets&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0. Retrieved on 2008-10-12. 
  64. Ono, H. (2002). "New and Remarkable Spiders of the Families Liphistiidae, Argyronetidae, Pisauridae, Theridiidae and Araneidae (Arachnida) from Japan". Bulletin of the National Science Museum (of Japan), Series A 28 (1 pages= 51-60). 
  65. Coyle, F.A. (1986). "The Role of Silk in Prey Capture". in Shear, W.A.. Stanford University Press. pp. 272–273. ISBN 0804712034. 
  66. Forster, R. R., and Platnick, N.I. (1984). "A review of the archaeid spiders and their relatives, with notes on the limits of the superfamily Palpimanoidea (Arachnida, Araneae)" (abstract). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 178: 1–106. http://hdl.handle.net/2246/991. Retrieved on 2008-10-13.  Full text at "A review of the archaeid spiders and their relatives" (PDF). Retrieved on 2008-10-13. (60 MB)
  67. Penney, D., and Selden, P.A.. Assembling the Tree of Life—Phylogeny of Spiders: a review of the strictly fossil spider families. in Deltshev, C., and Stoev, P.. "Eropean Arachnology 2005" (PDF). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica Supplement No. 1: 25–39. http://homepage.mac.com/paulselden/Sites/Website/Bulgaria.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-13. 
  68. "Natural history of Mygalomorphae". Agricultural Research Council of New Zealand. Retrieved on 2008-10-13.
  69. "Spiders". Illinois Department of Public Health. Retrieved on 2008-10-11.
  70. Vetter R, Barger D (2002). "An infestation of 2,055 brown recluse spiders (Araneae: Sicariidae) and no envenomations in a Kansas home: implications for bite diagnoses in nonendemic areas". J Med Entomol 39 (6): 948–51. 
  71. Hannum, C.and Miller, D.M.. "Widow Spiders". Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech. Retrieved on 2008-10-11.
  72. "Funnel web spiders". Australian Venom Research Unit. Retrieved on 2008-10-11.
  73. "Pub chef bitten by deadly spider". BBC. Retrieved on 2008-10-11.
  74. Diaz, J.H. (2004). "The Global Epidemiology, Syndromic Classification, Management, and Prevention of Spider Bites". American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71 (2): 239–250. http://www.ajtmh.org/cgi/content/abstract/71/2/239. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  75. Williamson, J.A., Fenner, P.J., Burnett, J.W., and Rifkin, J. (1996). Venomous and Poisonous Marine Animals: A Medical and Biological Handbook. UNSW Press. pp. 65–68. ISBN 0868402796. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YsZ3GryFIzEC&pg=PA75&lpg=PA75&dq=mollusc+venom+fatal&source=web&ots=tBDHW2xdlx&sig=PAvTz2z3hnwUyE4lfU8fvzwNbD4&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA57,M1. Retrieved on 2008-10-03. 
  76. Nishioka, S de A. (August 2001). "Misdiagnosis of brown recluse spider bite". Western Journal of Medicine 175 (2): 240. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1071491. Retrieved on 2008-10-03. 
  77. Isbister, G.K. (April 2001). "Spider mythology across the world". Western Journal of Medicine 174 (4): 86–87. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1071344. Retrieved on 2008-10-03. 
  78. Ray, N. (2002). Lonely Planet Cambodia. Lonely Planet Publications. p. 308. ISBN 1-74059-111-9. 
  79. Weil, C. (2006). Fierce Food. Plume. ISBN 0452287006. http://www.budgettravel.com/bt-dyn/content/article/2006/10/24/AR2006102400797.html. Retrieved on 2008-10-03. 
  80. "Spider Venom Could Yield Eco-Friendly Insecticides". National Science Foundation (USA). Retrieved on 2008-10-11.
  81. Novak, K. (2001). "Spider venom helps hearts keep their rhythm". Nature Medicine 7 (155). doi:10.1038/84588. 
  82. Lewis, R.J., and Garcia, M.L. (October 2003). "Therapeutic potential of venom peptides" (PDF). Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2: 790–802. doi:10.1038/nrd1197. http://imb.uq.edu.au/download/large/Venom_therapeutics.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  83. Bogin, O. (Spring 2005). "Venom Peptides and their Mimetics as Potential Drugs" (PDF). Modulator (19). http://www.alomone.com/System/UpLoadFiles/DGallery/Docs/Venom%20Peptides%20and%20their%20Mimetics%20as%20Potential%20Drugs.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  84. Andrade, E., Villanova, F., Borra, P., et al. "Penile erection induced in vivo by a purified toxin from the Brazilian spider Phoneutria nigriventer". British Journal of Urology International 102 (7): 835–837. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07762.x. 
  85. Hinman, M.B., Jones J.A., and Lewis, R.W. (September 2000). "Synthetic spider silk: a modular fiber" (PDF). Trends in Biotechnology 18 (9): 374–379. doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01481-5. http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/sme/FailureCases/Natural_Structures/Synthetic_spider_silk.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-19. 
  86. Menassa, R., Zhu, H., Karatzas, C.N., Lazaris, A., Richman, A., and Brandle, J. (June 2004). "Spider dragline silk proteins in transgenic tobacco leaves: accumulation and field production". Plant Biotechnology Journal 2 (5): 431–438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00087.x. 
  87. Friedenberg, J., and Silverman, G. (2005). Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind. SAGE. pp. 244–245. ISBN 1412925681. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wGti6_4Qn_QC&pg=PA244&dq=Arachnophobia&lr=&sig=ACfU3U2bQYuqAO7EUfWM6MCqFu-Jy-COAA#PPA244,M1. Retrieved on 2008-10-11. 
  88. Davey, G.C.L. (1994). "The “Disgusting” Spider: The Role of Disease and Illness in the Perpetuation of Fear of Spiders". Society and Animals 2 (1): 17–25. doi:10.1163/156853094X00045. 
  89. Maltin, L., and Edelman, R., ed. (2002). Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide 2002. Signet. p. 58. ISBN 9780451203922. 
  90. "IGN: Arachnophobia". Retrieved on 2008-10-11.
  91. De Vos, Gail (1996). Tales, Rumors, and Gossip: Exploring Contemporary Folk Literature in Grades 7-12. Libraries Unlimited. pp. 186. ISBN 1563081903. http://books.google.com/books?id=M8bvN93y-fIC&pg=PA186&dq=spiders+folklore+and+mythology&lr=&ei=HHsNSNGgNZOKsgO2sqnHAQ&sig=rfYxr-r7pktGmHuA31vEUL99rn8. Retrieved on 2008-04-22. 
  92. Garai, Jana (1973). The Book of Symbols. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 671-21773-9. 
  93. De Laguna et al, Frederica (2002). American Anthropology: Papers from the American Anthropologist. University of Nebraska Press. pp. 455. ISBN 080328280X. http://books.google.com/books?id=XIFX-sSYURwC&pg=PA455&dq=Spider+creation+myth&sig=RI0W9BNC-E36_Le7G2bMvhbjQNw. Retrieved on 2008-04-21. 
  94. Benson, Elizabeth, The Mochica: A Culture of Peru. New York, NY: Praeger Press. 1972
  95. Berrin, Katherine & Larco Museum. The Spirit of Ancient Peru:Treasures from the Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera. New York: Thames and Hudson, 1997.

References

External links

General

Regional

Morphology

Taxonomy

Pictures

Other