Maurice Allais
 |
|
| Birth | 31 May 1911 |
|---|---|
| Nationality | France |
| Field | Macroeconomics |
Maurice Félix Charles Allais (born 31 May 1911) is a French economist, and was the 1988 winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics "for his pioneering contributions to the theory of markets and efficient utilization of resources."
Contents |
The economist
Born in Paris, France, Allais graduated from the École Polytechnique in Paris and studied at the École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris. His academic and non-academic posts have included being Professor of Economics at the École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (since 1944) and Director of its Economic Analysis Centre (since 1946). In 1949 he received a Doctor-Engineer title from the University of Paris, Faculty of Science. He also held teaching positions at various institutions, among which the University of Paris X-Nanterre.
As an economist he made contributions to decision theory, monetary policy and other areas. His name is particularly associated with what is commonly known as the Allais paradox, a decision problem he first presented in 1953 which contradicts expected utility hypothesis.
In 1992, Maurice Allais criticized the Maastricht Treaty for its excessive emphasis on free trade. He also expressed reservations on the single european currency.[1] In 2005, he expressed similar reservations concerning the European constitution.[2]. The National Front and the Mouvement National Républicain both claim that their economic program is inspired by the ideas of Maurice Allais.[3][4]
His interest in physics
Besides his career in economics, Maurice Allais performed experiments between 1952 and 1960 in the field of gravitation, special relativity and electromagnetism, in order to investigate mutual links between these fields. He reported three effects with respect to these experiments:
- An unexpected anomalous effect in the angular velocity of the plane of oscillation of a paraconical pendulum, detected during two solar eclipse events in 1954 and 1959. This effect is now called the Allais effect.
- Anomalous regularities in the oscillation of the paraconical pendulum, with periodicity 24h50min, which corresponds to the tidal lunar day.
- Anomalous regularities in optical theodolite measurements, with the same tidal periodicity.
Over the years, a number of pendulum experiments were performed by scientists around the world to verify his findings. However, the results were mixed[5].
Allais's explanation for his observations contradicts the theory of relativity.
Subsequently, in order to confront the optical anomaly with established experimental results, Prof. Allais performed a statistical analysis of the thousands of interferometer measurements of Dayton Miller and found a corresponding periodicity with the sidereal day, the equinoxes and other celestial events.
According to Allais, the anomalous effects demonstrate a sofar unknown anisotropy of Space as well as an effect of total velocity.
He disagrees with Robert S. Shankland's analysis of Miller's data, which many physicists consider as the reference work on the subject. Shankland attributed the deviations from relativity predictions to systematic errors of readings and thermal instabilities, despite Miller's claims to the contrary. Actually, some physicists, like Alan Kostelecky, are testing the possibility of space anisotropy (totally unrelated to Allais' fringe work). This type of mainstream search is currently ongoing.[6]
Roger Balian wrote a note to refute Allais's interpretation of Miller's result[7], which was in turn rebutted by Allais[8]
Allais has not only interest on physics but writes as well on physics history. In the relativity priority dispute, he sees Albert Einstein as a plagiarist and he denies the validity of the mainstream experimental data.[9] He often mixes the two subjects in the same papers.
Notable quotes
- "In essence, the present creation of money, out of nothing by the banking system, is similar - I do not hesitate to say it in order to make people clearly realize what is at stake here - to the creation of money by counterfeiters, so rightly condemned by law."
Notes
- ↑ L'Humanité (French) 17 September 1992
- ↑ L'Humanité (French) 26 May 2005
- ↑ National Front web site
- ↑ Maurice Allais on Bruno Mégret's web site
- ↑ Decrypting the Eclipse
- ↑ [1] [2] [3]
- ↑ "Remarques sur les notes de Maurice Allais [...]" Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences", 2000, t. 1, série IV p.249-250
- ↑ "L'Origine des régularités constatéees dans les observations interférométriques de Dayton C. Miller 1925-1926 : variations de température ou anisotropie de l'espace" (with abridged English version), Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences, 2000, t. 1, série IV, p.1205-1210
- ↑ Paradoxe
References
- R. S. Shankland, S. W. McCuskey, F. C. Leone, and G. Kuerti, "New analysis of the interferometric observations of Dayton C. Miller", Rev. Mod. Phys. 27, 167–178 (1955).
- R. S. Shankland, "Michelson's role in the development of relativity", Applied Optics 12 (10), 2280 (1973).
External links
- "Maurice Allais -Autobiography" Nobel Prize, nobel.se.
- Eugene G. Garfield The 1998 Nobel Prize in Economics
- "Maurice Allais" - Allais' website
- Allais' CV, 1987
- IDEAS/RePEc
 |
This economics or finance-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This article about an
|
||||||||