Intubation

Intubation being practiced on a dummy (conventional technique using a laryngoscope).

In medicine, intubation refers to the placement of a tube into an external or internal orifice of the body. Although the term can refer to endoscopic procedures, it is most often used to denote tracheal intubation. Tracheal intubation is the placement of a flexible plastic tube into the trachea to protect the patient's airway and provide a means of mechanical ventilation. The most common tracheal intubation is orotracheal intubation where, with the assistance of a laryngoscope, an endotracheal tube is passed through the mouth, larynx, and vocal cords, into the trachea. A bulb is then inflated near the distal tip of the tube to help secure it in place and protect the airway from blood, vomit, and secretions. Another possibility is nasotracheal intubation where a tube is passed through the nose, larynx, vocal cords, and trachea.

Extubation is the removal of the tube.

Contents

Risk vs. benefit

Tracheal intubation is a potentially very dangerous invasive procedure that requires a great deal of clinical experience to master.[1] When performed improperly (e.g., unrecognized esophageal intubation), the associated complications may rapidly lead to the patient's death.[2] Subsequently, tracheal intubation's role as the "gold standard" of advanced airway maintenance was downplayed (in favor of more basic techniques like bag-valve-mask ventilation) by the American Heart Association's Guidelines for Cardiopulminary Resuscitation in 2000,[2] and again in 2005.[3]

Risk management

No single method for confirming tube placement has been shown to be 100% reliable. Accordingly, the use of multiple methods to confirm correct tube placement is now the standard of care. At least one of the methods utilized should be an instrument. Waveform capnography is emerging as the gold standard instrument for the confirmation of correct tube placement and maintenance of the tube once it is in place.

Predicting ease of intubation

Observational methods to confirm correct tube placement

Instruments to confirm correct tube placement

Tube maintenance

The tube is secured in place with tape or an endotracheal tube holder. A cervical collar is sometimes used to prevent motion of the airway. Tube placement should be confirmed after each physical move of the patient and after any unexplained change in the patient's clinical status. Continuous pulse oximetry and continuous waveform capnography are often used to monitor the tube's correct placement.

Indications

Tracheal intubation is performed by practitioners in various medical conditions:

Types of tubes

There are various types of tracheal tubes for oral or nasal intubation. Tubes may be flexible or preformed and relatively stiff. They are usually made of flexible plastic or silicone, though they may be armored with metallic rings to prevent kinking. Adult tubes have an inflatable cuff to seal the lower airways against air leakage and gross aspiration. The cuff must be maintained diligently in order to avoid complications from over-inflation, which can include rupture of the trachea, tracheal malacia, tracheoesophageal fistula. Many of the complications of over-inflated cuffs can be traced to cuff pressure against the tracheal wall causing ischemia of the mucosa underneath. [4]

Special double-lumen endotracheal tubes have been developed for ventilating each lung independently -- this is useful during lung and other intra-thoracic surgery. Smaller pediatric tubes generally are uncuffed, as the cricoid cartilage, the narrowest portion of the pediatric airway, often provides an adequate seal for mechanical ventilation. An excessive leak can sometimes be corrected through the placement of a larger (0.5mm larger in internal diameter) endotracheal tube, although in difficult-to-ventilate patients even children may need to use cuffed tubes to allow for high pressure ventilation if the leak is too great to overcome with the ventilator. [1].

Techniques

Nasal intubation

Several techniques exist. Tracheal intubation can be performed by direct laryngoscopy (conventional technique), in which a laryngoscope is used to obtain a view of the glottis. A tube is then inserted under direct vision. This technique can usually only be employed if the patient is comatose (unconscious), under general anesthesia, or has received local or topical anesthesia to the upper airway structures (e.g., using a local anesthetic drug such as lidocaine).

Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is a variation of the standard technique for patients under anesthesia. It is performed when immediate definitive airway management through intubation is required, and especially when there is a risk of aspiration. For RSI, a short acting sedative such as etomidate, propofol, thiopental or midazolam is normally administered, followed shortly thereafter by a paralytic such as succinylcholine or rocuronium. RSI is only correctly performed using an induction agent with a 1 arm-brain circulation time. The only agents classically used are those with 1 arm brain circulation times and are Thiopentone and etomidate. This provides the shortest induction time, and provided the appropriate dose based on body mass is used, protects against awareness during the RSI. Propofol and midazolam (in combination with other induction agents) may be used for induction where there is more time, however, propofol is increasingly being used to good effect for RSI.

Another alternative is intubation of the awake patient under local anesthesia using a flexible endoscope or by other means (e.g., using a video laryngoscope). This technique is preferred if difficulties are anticipated, as it allows the patient to breathe spontaneously throughout the procedure, thus ensuring ventilation and oxygenation even in the event of a failed intubation.

Some alternatives to intubation are

Because the life of a patient can depend on the success of an intubation, it is important to assess possible obstacles beforehand. The ease of intubation is difficult to predict. One score to assess anatomical difficulties is the Mallampati score,[5] which is determined by looking at the anatomy of the oral cavity and based on the visibility of the base of uvula, faucial pillars and the soft palate. It should however be noted that no single score or combination of scores can be trusted to detect all patients who are difficult to intubate. Therefore, persons performing intubation must be familiar with alternative techniques of securing the airways.

History

The first known description on the surgical procedure of intubation was given in the 1020s by Avicenna in The Canon of Medicine in order to facilitate breathing.[6] The first detailed report on endotracheal intubation and following artificial respiration of animals was in 1543, when Andreas Vesalius pointed out in this report that such a measure could sometimes be life-saving. It remained unnoticed however.

In 1869, the German surgeon Friedrich Trendelenburg accomplished the first successful intubation of humans for anaesthesia. He introduced the tube through a temporary tracheotomy. In 1878, the British surgeon McEwen performed the first oral intubation.

During the First World War, Magill and Macintosh achieved profound improvements in the application of intubation. The most used replaceable spatula of the laryngoscope is named after Macintosh. The Magill curve of an endotracheal tube and the Magill pliers for positioning the tubus during nasal intubation are named after Magill.

Technology

Laryngoscope

Historically, the most common device used for intubation has been the laryngoscope. Although it has proven sufficient throughout history, many serious problems can arise from its misuse (ex. dental trauma). Newer technologies such as flexible laryngoscopy have fared better in reducing problematic incidence, though the most common cause of intubation trauma is a lack of skill on the part of the laryngoscopist.

The laryngoscope consists of a handle, usually containing batteries, and an interchangeable blade. There are two styles of laryngoscope blades commercially available: the straight blade, and the curved blade. The most popular style of straight blade is the Miller blade, with the Macintosh being the most popular style of curved blade. The technique required is slightly different depending on the style of blade being used; in adults, the Macintosh blade is usually preferred by practitioners, whereas with neonates the Miller blade is the more commonly-used style.

There are many other styles of straight and curved blades, with accessories such as prisms (for enlarging the field of view) and ports for the administration of oxygen. These specialty blades are primarily designed for use by the anaesthetist in the operating room.

Fiber optics

Another common technology used for intubation has been fibre optics, most notably the fibre optic bronchoscope. Intubation over a fibre optic bronchoscope is the preferred method for those who have been deemed difficult to intubate using traditional methods (colloquially known as a "difficult airway".) Using fibre optic bronchoscopy or rhinoscopy still has its drawbacks, however; it requires a significant degree of skill to manipulate the bronchoscope, making this method somewhat inaccessible to practitioners who are not proficient in its use. The equipment has a high initial cost of purchase, is extremely fragile, and very expensive to repair. [7] While traditional intubation with laryngoscopy is ideally achieved in less than 20 seconds, intubation with a bronchoscope can take considerably longer, making its use in highly emergent situations somewhat limited.

Image sensor

The latest technology used to intubate is a computer system utilizing CMOS image sensors. Visibility failures still occur but to a lesser extent. Also, this technology is still extremely expensive and little used, but progress has been made to reduce visibility failures and costs.

Pediatric Intubation [8]

Most of the general principles of anaesthesia can be applied to children, but there are some significant anatomical and physiological differences between children and adults that can cause problem, especially in neonates and children weighing less than 15 kg.

Route for intubation

For infants and young children oral intubation is easier than nasal. Nasal route carries risk of dislodgement of adenoid tissue and epistaxis, but advantages in good fixation of tube. Because of good fixation, Nasal route is preferable then oral route in children undergoing intensive care and requiring prolonged intubation.

Position of tube

The tip of tube should be at midtrachea (between the clavicles on an AP chest X-ray). The position of the tube is checked by auscultation (equal air entry on each side and, in long-term intubation, by chest X-ray).

Type of tubes

Uncuffed tubes (plain tubes) are commonly used in prepubescent children. In cross section the airway in children is circular which makes plain tracheal tube fits better than cuffed tube.

Cuffed tubes less than 6.0 mm and not inflated are accepted for use in paediatry but generally in children less than 10 years old cuffed tubes are avoided to minimize subglottic swelling and ulceration.

Size of tube

Because the airway of a child is narrow, a small amount of oedema can produce severe obstruction. Oedema can easily be caused by forcing in a tracheal tube that is too tight. (If length of the tube is suspected to be large, immediate changing it to the smaller size is suggestible.)

The correct diameter of the tube is that which results in a small leak at a pressure of about 25cm of water (the tip should be at midtrachea, between the clavicles on an AP chest Xray).

For normally nourished children more than about 2 years old, the following formula to calculate the internal diameter of the tube is likely to be of the correct size

Formula

Internal diameter of tube (mm) = (age in years ÷ 4) + 4

Rough idea

Roughly correct tube size can be indicated by: Inner Diameter: can be estimated by the size of the child's little finger. (For neonates, 3 mm internal diameter is accepted while for premature infants 2.5 mm internal diameter may be necessary.) Length: can be estimated by doubling the distance from the corner of the child's mouth to the ear canal.

References

  1. von Goedecke, A., Herff, H., Paal, P., "Field Airway Management Disasters," Anesth Analg, 2007;104:481-483.
  2. 2.0 2.1 ACLS: Principles and Practice. pp. 135-180. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2003. ISBN 0-87493-341-2.
  3. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 7.1: Adjuncts for Airway Control and Ventilation. Circulation 2005;112:IV-51-IV-57
  4. BioMed Central | Full text | Endotracheal tube cuff pressure in three hospitals, and the volume required to produce an appropriate cuff pressure
  5. Mallampati S, Gatt S, Gugino L, Desai S, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu P (1985). "A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study.". Can Anaesth Soc J 32 (4): 429–34. PMID 4027773. 
  6. Patricia Skinner (2001), Unani-tibbi, Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine
  7. Bronchoscope damage and repair costs: results of a...[Respir Care. 1992] - PubMed Result
  8. ISBN 92 4 154575 5 Surgical care at the district hospital

External links

Relevant journal articles