Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most luminous electromagnetic events occurring in the universe since the Big Bang. They are flashes of gamma rays emanating from seemingly random places in deep space at random times. The duration of a gamma-ray burst is typically a few seconds, but can range from a few milliseconds to several minutes, and the initial burst is usually followed by a longer-lived "afterglow" emitting at longer wavelengths (X-ray, ultraviolet, optical, infrared, and radio). Gamma-ray bursts are detected by orbiting satellites about two to three times per week.
Most observed GRBs appear to be collimated emissions caused by the collapse of the core of a rapidly rotating, high-mass star into a black hole. A subclass of GRBs (the "short" bursts) appear to originate from a different process, the leading theory being the collision of neutron stars orbiting in a binary system. All observed GRBs have originated from outside our own galaxy; though a related class of phenomena, SGR flares, are associated with galactic magnetars. The sources of most GRBs have been billions of light years away.
A nearby gamma ray burst could possibly cause mass extinctions on Earth.[1] Though the short duration of a gamma ray burst would limit the immediate damage to life, a nearby burst might alter atmospheric chemistry by reducing the ozone layer and generating acidic nitrogen oxides. These atmospheric changes could ultimately cause severe damage to the biosphere.
Contents |
Gamma-ray bursts were discovered in the late 1960s by the US Vela nuclear test detection satellites. The Velas were built to detect gamma-radiation pulses emitted by nuclear weapon tests in space. The United States suspected that the USSR might attempt to conduct secret nuclear tests after signing the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1963. In a classic example of scientific serendipity, the satellites detected flashes of radiation that looked nothing like nuclear weapons signatures, coming from seemingly random directions in deep space. These findings were published in 1973,[2] prompting the scientific study of what were then identified as GRBs.
The presence of GRBs was confirmed later by many space missions such as the US Apollo and the Soviet Venera probes. To explain these events, many speculative theories were advanced, most of which posited nearby galactic sources. Little progress was made, however, until the 1991 launch of the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory and its Burst and Transient Source Explorer (BATSE) instrument, an extremely sensitive gamma-ray detector. This instrument provided crucial data indicating that GRBs are isotropic (not biased towards any particular direction in space, such as toward the galactic plane or the galactic center),[3] and therefore ruling out nearly all galactic origins. BATSE data also showed that GRBs fall into two distinct categories: short-duration, hard-spectrum bursts ("short bursts"), and long-duration, soft-spectrum bursts ("long bursts").[4] Short bursts are typically less than two seconds in duration and are dominated by higher-energy photons; long bursts are typically more than two seconds in duration and dominated by lower-energy photons. The separation is not absolute and the populations overlap observationally, but the distinction suggests two different classes of progenitors. However, some believe there is a third type of GRBs.[5][6][7][8] The three kinds of GRBs are hypothesized to reflect three different origins: mergers of neutron star systems, mergers between white dwarfs and neutron stars, and the collapse of massive stars.[9]
For decades after the discovery of GRBs astronomers could not find any counterpart or host to them, such as a star or galaxy, owing to poor resolution of their detectors. The best hope seemed to lie in finding a fainter, fading, longer wavelength emission after the burst itself, the "afterglow" of a GRB.[10]
In 1997 the Italian/Dutch satellite BeppoSAX detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 970228),[11] and when the X-ray camera was pointed towards the direction from which the burst had originated it detected a fading X-ray emission. Ground-based telescopes later identified a fading optical counterpart as well.[12] The location of this event having been identified, once the GRB faded, deep imaging was able to identify a faint, very distant host galaxy in the GRB location.[13] Within only a few weeks the long controversy about the distance scale ended: GRBs were extragalactic events originating inside faint galaxies at enormous distances.[14] By finally establishing the distance scale, characterizing the environments in which GRBs occur, and providing a new window on GRBs both observationally and theoretically, this discovery revolutionized the study of GRBs.[15]
As of 2007, a similar revolution in GRB astronomy is in progress, largely as a result of the successful launch of NASA's Swift satellite in November 2004, which combines a sensitive gamma-ray detector with the ability to point on-board X-ray and optical telescopes towards the direction of a new burst in less than a minute.[16] Swift's discoveries include the first observations of short burst afterglows and vast amount of data on the behavior of GRB afterglows at early stages during their evolution, even before the GRB's gamma-ray emission has stopped. The mission has also discovered large X-ray flares appearing within minutes to days after the end of the GRB.
On June 11, 2008 NASA's Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST), later renamed the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, was launched. The mission objectives include "crack[ing] the mysteries of the stupendously powerful explosions known as gamma-ray bursts."[17]
Prior to the launch of BATSE, the distance scale to GRBs was completely unknown. Theories for the location of these events ranged from the outer regions of our own solar system to the edges of the known universe. The discovery that bursts were isotropic—coming from completely random directions—narrowed down these possibilities greatly, and by the mid 1990s only two theories were considered generally viable: that GRBs originate from a very large, diffuse halo (or "corona") around our own galaxy, or that they originate from distant galaxies far beyond our local group.
Supporters of the galactic model pointed to the class of well-known objects known as soft gamma repeaters (SGRs), highly magnetized galactic neutron stars known to periodically erupt in bright flares at gamma-ray and other wavelengths, and stated that there may be an unobserved population of similar objects at greater distances, producing GRBs.[18] Furthermore, the sheer brightness of a typical gamma-ray burst would impose enormous requirements on the energy released in such an event if it really occurred in a distant galaxy.
Supporters of the extragalactic model claimed that the galactic neutron-star hypothesis involved too many ad-hoc assumptions in order to reproduce the degree of isotropy reported by BATSE and that an extragalactic model was far more natural regardless of its problems.[19]
The discovery of afterglow emission associated with faraway galaxies definitively supported the extragalactic hypothesis. Not only are GRBs extragalactic events, but they are also observable to the limits of the visible universe; a typical GRB has a redshift of at least 1.0 (corresponding to a distance of 8 billion light-years), while the most distant known (GRB 080913) has a redshift of 6.7 (corresponding to a distance of 12.8 billion light years). GRB 080913's "lookback time" reveals that the burst occurred less than 825 million years after the universe began. The previous record holder was a burst with a redshift of 6.29, which placed it 70 million light-years closer than GRB 080913. [20] As observers are able to acquire spectra of only a fraction of bursts - usually the brightest ones - many GRBs may actually originate from even higher redshifts.
Many GRBs have been observed to undergo a jet break in their light curve, during which the optical afterglow quickly changes from slowly fading to rapidly fading as the jet slows down.[21] Furthermore, features suggestive of significant asymmetry have been observed in at least one nearby type Ic supernova, which may have the same progenitor stars as GRBs and have been observed to accompany GRBs in some cases (see "Progenitors", below). The jet opening angle (degree of beaming), however, varies greatly, from 2 degrees to more than 20 degrees. There is some evidence which suggests that the jet angles and apparent energy released are correlated in such a way that the true energy release of a (long) GRB is approximately constant—about 1044 J, or around 1/2000 of a solar mass.[22] This is comparable to the energy released in a bright type Ib/c supernova (sometimes termed a "hypernova"). Bright hypernovae do in fact appear to accompany some GRBs.[23]
The fact that GRBs are jetted also suggests that there are far more events occurring in the Universe than those actually seen, even when factoring in the limited sensitivity of available detectors. Most jetted GRBs will "miss" the Earth and never be seen; only a small fraction happen to be pointed the right way to allow detection. Still, even with these considerations, the rate of GRBs is very small—about once per galaxy per 100,000 years.[24]
The above arguments apply only to long-duration GRBs. Short GRBs, while also extragalactic, appear to come from a lower-redshift population and are less luminous than long GRBs.[25] They appear to be generally less beamed[26] or possibly not beamed,[27] intrinsically less energetic than their longer counterparts, and probably more frequent in the universe despite being observed rarely.
The immense distances of most gamma-ray burst sources from Earth has made pinning down the nature of the system that produces these explosions extremely difficult. The currently favored model for the origin of most observed GRBs is the collapsar model,[28] in which the core of an extremely massive, low-metallicity, rapidly-rotating star collapses into a black hole, and the infall of material from the star onto the black hole powers an extremely energetic jet that blasts outward through the stellar envelope. When the jet reaches the stellar surface, a gamma-ray burst is produced.
While the collapsar model has enjoyed a great deal of success, many other models exist that are still seriously considered. Winds from highly magnetized, newly-formed neutron stars (protomagnetars), accretion-induced collapse of older neutron stars, and the mergers of binary neutron stars have all been proposed as alternative models.[29][30][31][32] The different models are not mutually exclusive, and it is possible that different bursts have different progenitors. For example, there is now good evidence that some short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs with a duration of less than about two seconds) occur in galaxies without massive stars,[25] providing strong evidence that this subset of events is associated with a different progenitor population from longer bursts - for example, merging neutron stars. However, in 2007 the detection of 39 short gamma-ray bursts could not be associated with gravitational waves which are thought of as observables of such compact mergers.[33] Another model was recently presented[34] based on the similarities between the time evolution of the GRB spectrum and that of a sonic boom.
The means by which gamma-ray bursts convert energy into radiation remains poorly understood, and as of 2007 there is still no generally accepted model for how this process occurs.[35] A successful model of GRBs must explain not only the energy source, but also the physical process for generating an emission of gamma rays which matches the durations, light spectra, and other characteristics observed.[36] The nature of the longer-wavelength (X-ray through radio) afterglow emission that follows gamma-ray bursts has been modeled much more successfully as synchrotron emission from a relativistic shock wave propagating through interstellar space,[37][38] but this model has had difficulty explaining the observed features of some observed GRB afterglows (particularly at early times and in the X-ray band)[39], and may be incomplete, or in some cases even inaccurate.
Research has been conducted to investigate the consequences of Earth being hit by a beam of gamma rays from a nearby (about 500 light years) gamma ray burst. This is motivated by the efforts to explain mass extinctions on Earth and estimate the probability of extraterrestrial life. Scientists suspect that if a GRB were to occur near our solar system, and one of the beams were to hit Earth, it could cause mass extinctions all over the planet. The GRB would have to be less than 3,000 light years away to pose a danger.[40] A consensus seems to have been reached that damage by a gamma ray burst would be very limited because of its very short duration, and the fact that it would only cover half the Earth, the other half being in its shadow. A sufficiently close gamma ray burst would however, result in serious damage to the atmosphere, shutting down communications (due to electro-magnetic disturbances), perhaps instantly wiping out half the ozone layer, and causing nitrogen-oxygen recombination, thereby generating acidic nitrogen oxides. These effects could diffuse across to the other side of the Earth, severely diminish the global food supply, and result in long-term climate and atmospheric changes and a mass extinction, reducing the global population to perhaps 10% of what it can now support.[41] The damage from a gamma ray burst would probably be significantly greater than a supernova at the same distance.
The idea that a nearby gamma-ray burst could significantly affect the Earth's atmosphere and potentially cause severe damage to the biosphere was introduced in 1995 by physicist Stephen Thorsett, then at Princeton University.[42] In 2005, scientists at NASA and the University of Kansas released a more detailed study which suggested that the Ordovician-Silurian extinction events which occurred 450 million years ago could have been triggered by a gamma-ray burst.[1] They did not have direct evidence to suggest that such a burst resulted in the ancient extinction, rather the strength of their work was their atmospheric modeling, essentially a "what if" scenario. The scientists calculated that gamma-ray radiation from a relatively nearby star explosion, hitting the Earth for only ten seconds, could deplete up to half of the atmosphere's protective ozone layer, the recovery for which would take at least five years. With the ozone layer damaged, ultraviolet radiation from the Sun would kill much of the life on land and near the surface of oceans and lakes, disrupting the food chain. While gamma-ray bursts in our Milky Way galaxy are indeed rare, NASA scientists estimate that at least one nearby event has probably hit the Earth in the past billion years, with life on Earth being at least 3.5 billion years old. Dr. Bruce Lieberman, a paleontologist at the University of Kansas, originated the idea that a gamma-ray burst specifically could have caused the great Ordovician extinction. He said, "We do not know exactly when one came, but we're rather sure it did come - and left its mark. What's most surprising is that just a 10-second burst can cause years of devastating ozone damage."[43]
Comparative work in 2006 on galaxies in which GRBs have occurred suggests that metal-deficient galaxies are the most likely candidates. The likelihood of the metal-rich Milky Way galaxy hosting a GRB was estimated at less than 0.15%, significantly reducing the likelihood that a burst had caused mass extinction events on Earth.[44]
The Wolf-Rayet star WR 104, located 8000 light years from Earth, has been found to have a rotational axis aligned within 16° of the solar system. The chances of it producing a gamma ray burst are small, and the effects on earth from such an event are still not fully understood.[45]
It is widely speculated that if Loop quantum gravity (LQG) Theory is correct then a measurable "diffraction" of particles of like frequency from a burst will occur; if such an effect is observed it may offer proof of the existence of quantum gravity.[46]
GRBs of significant historical or scientific importance include: