Coprophilia

Coprophilia (from Greek κόπρος, kópros—excrement and φιλία, filía—liking, fondness), also called scat,[1] is the paraphilia involving sexual pleasure from feces.[2][3] In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-IV-TR), it is classified under 302.9 Paraphilia Not Otherwise Specified and has no diagnostic criteria other than a general statement about paraphilias that says "the diagnosis is made if the behavior, sexual urges, or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning." Furthermore, the DSM-IV-TR notes, "Fantasies, behaviors, or objects are paraphilic only when they lead to clinically significant distress or impairment (e.g. are obligatory, result in sexual dysfunction, require participation of nonconsenting individuals, lead to legal complications, interfere with social relationships)."

Although not all coprophiles would necessarily be sadomasochists, little data on the prevalence of this behavior is available except from studies of the SM community. A study of 164 male sadomasochists from Finland from two sadomasochism clubs[4] found that 18.2% had engaged in coprophilia; 3% as a sadist, 6.1% as a masochist, and 9.1% as both. Eighteen percent of heterosexuals in the study pool had tried coprophilia; 17% of homosexuals had (no statistically significant difference between heterosexuals and homosexuals). In a separate article,[5] a subset of 12 men from that study who engaged in bestiality was analyzed and found that 54.5% of the 12 men had engaged in coprophilic behaviors, compared with only 8.3% of 12 of the men who did not engage in bestiality who matched up logically with each of the 12 who did. (A matched pairs study was done.)

Contents

Forms

Cleveland steamer

The Cleveland steamer is a form of coprophilia, where a person defecates on a partner's chest.[6] [7] The term received news attention through its use in a U.S. Congress staff hoax email and being addressed by the United States Federal Communications Commission.[8]

Usage examples:

See also

References

  1. Holmes, Ronald M.. Sex Crimes: Patterns and Behavior. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. pp. p. 244. ISBN 0761924175. OCLC 47893709. 
  2. Corsini, Raymond J. (2002). The Dictionary of Psychology. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge. pp. p. 224. ISBN 1583913289. OCLC 48932974. 
  3. Flora, Rudy (2001). How to Work with Sex Offenders: A Handbook for Criminal Justice, Human Service, and Mental Health Professionals. New York: Haworth Clinical Practice Press. pp. p. 91. ISBN 0789014998. OCLC 45668958. 
  4. "Sexual Behavior and Social Adaptation Among Sadomasochistically-Oriented Males", Journal of Sex Research, August, 1999 by N. Kenneth Sandnabba, Pekka Santtila, Niklas Nordling
  5. "Characteristics of a Sample of Sadomasochistically-oriented Males with Recent Experience of Sexual Contact with Animals". Sandnabba N.K.; Santtila P.; Nordling N.; Beetz A.M.; Alison L. Deviant Behavior, Volume 23, Number 6, 1 November 2002
  6. Body Vibes Adult Toys. (2007) Sex Dictionary: Sexual definitions for the letter C. Obtained July 11, 2007
  7. The Complete Asshole's Guide to Handling Chicks: Dan Indante and Karl Marks, St. Martin's Press, 2003. p265
  8. State Of Shock | Shock Jocks | Pop Culture News | News + Notes | Entertainment Weekly | 1
  9. 9.0 9.1 Wolk, Josh. (May 30, 2003) Entertainment Weekly. State Of Shock: Day after day, from sea to shining sea, America's SHOCK JOCKS manage to shtick it where the FCC don't shine. Section: No. 712.
  10. Federal Communications Commission (April 3, 2003) Notice of Apparent Liability (NAL). Obtained July 11, 2007.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Akers, Mary Ann. (May 5, 2005) Roll Call Stinky Hoax.
  12. Akers, Mary Ann. (December 21, 2005) Roll Call Best of HOH.
  13. Kent, Melissa. (May 25, 2005) The West Australian. Big gross-out. Section: Features; Page 3.

External links