Conquistador

This article is about the Spanish explorer soldiers of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries,for other uses see Conquistador (disambiguation)
Francisco Pizarro

Conquistador (pronounced /kkwstdr/ in English; Spanish pronunciation: [kokista�or] "conqueror") is the name given to any one of the Spanish soldiers, leaders, explorers, and adventurers who took part in the gradual conquest of large parts of the Americas, bringing them under Spanish rule between the 15th and 19th centuries. The term is also commonly used to describe the Portuguese explorers and conquerors of Brazil, though the proper term for "Conquistadors" from Portugal is Bandeirantes. The conquistadors have been widely vilified in later and especially non-Spanish histories for their treatment of the native civilizations. However, accusations have been leveled that the Spanish explorers and conquerors have been unfairly treated by revisionist history when compared to the historical descriptions of other European conquests of the New World and other colonized areas such as Africa and Asia (see the black legend).

Contents

Characteristics of the conquistadors

The bulk of the conquistadors were generally younger men, while their captains and leaders were mostly middle aged.

"The captains of the company were not conquering old people and adolescents as the rest of the host. They were usually mature men, neither young nor old, because a youth would not be respected and the elderly man would not have the strength needed for their exploits. The warlords of the conquest of Mexico (Cortes, Alvarado) were 34 years old. Francisco Pizarro, was the oldest of all. Therefore, the Spaniards called him "El Viejo"(Old) and the Incas called him the "Apu Machu". by Pablo Macera{clarifyme}

The authority of the captain was assured by being granted a royal commission, by his experience and the fact that he controlled the spoils. On some occasions, the captains had to resort to extreme measures to maintain their authority, as when [[Hern�n Cort�s]] ordered his men to burn their ships or when Francisco Pizarro charted the bay with his sword on the island of Gallo. Due in part to these types of actions, the soldiers began to see the conquistador captains as heroes and legendary figures. In the case of the conquest of Peru, discipline was maintained until the spoils were split among the men. Once the strict discipline was relaxed, murders and even armed uprisings against the captains resulted.

A conquistador is any one of the spanish leaders of the spanish conquest of the America's in the 1500s. -haley Another feature of the conquistadors was the relatively low percentage to come from nobility compared with other contemporary military ventures. Julio R. Villanueva Sotomayor tells us that only 30% of conquistadors were noblemen. Commoners made up the bulk of the Spanish forces. Joining a conquistador company was a very attractive method of social advancement in a rigidly stratified society, and a particularly enticing one for un-employed veterans and mercenaries{Fact|date=May 2008}.

The conquest of the Americas by Spain

Main article Spanish colonization of the Americas.
Pedro de Valdivia founding of Santiago de Chile.

Spanish chroniclers have traditionally characterized the conquest of the Americas as an impressive and laudable feat that occurred at an unprecedented rate. The stated purposes of these conquests were equally to spread the word of God and to bring civilization to the most obscure parts of the world. On the contrary, the testimony of some indigenous peoples as well as some contemporary Spanish humanists, clergymen and other writers have presented the Spanish Conquest of Americas as a series of unfortunate and morally questionable acts that were driven by greed for gold and resulted in the destruction of several native civilizations.

Historians have highlighted the short time required for the Spanish conquest of vast populations in the Americas. Exposure of these previously unexposed populations to European diseases caused many more fatalities than the wars themselves, and severely weakened the natives' social structures. The people in the Americas were not previously exposed to several European diseases which resulted in their much higher fatality rate than that of European populations. The diseases moved much faster than invading armies. When the Spanish conquistadors arrived in the Inca empire, a large portion of the population, including the emperor, had already been killed by a smallpox epidemic.

The Laws of Burgos, 1512-1513 were the first codified set of laws governing the behavior of Spanish settlers in America, particularly with regards to native Indians. They forbade the maltreatment of natives, and endorsed their conversion to Catholicism.[1] In the 16th century perhaps 240,000 Europeans entered American ports.[2][3] By the late 16th century American silver accounted for one-fifth of Spain's total budget.[4]

Factors

While technological and cultural factors played an important role in the victories and defeats of the conquistadors, one very decisive factor was the diseases brought from Europe, especially smallpox, which in many cases annihilated entire nations before the arrival of the Spaniards. Another key factor was the ability of the conquistadors to manipulate the political situation between indigenous peoples, either by supporting one side of a civil war, as in the case of the Inca Empire, or allying with natives who had been subjugated by more powerful neighboring tribes and kingdoms, as in the case of the Aztec empire.

Militarily, conquistadors had several advantages over native peoples, most notably firearms and steel. While the indigenous peoples had the advantage of established settlements, determination to remain independent and sheer numerical superiority, which in many cases was a decisive factor in the defeat of the conquistadors, the European diseases combined with the European's advanced military technology and divide-and-conquor tactics ultimately overcame the native populations.

Throughout the conquest the numbers of people within the indigenous nations greatly exceeded the Spanish conquistadors; on average the Spanish population never exceeded 2% of the native population. The Spanish conquistadors commonly allied with natives to bolster their numerically inferior ranks with thousands of indigenous auxiliaries. The army with which [[Hern�n Cort�s]] besieged Tenochtitlan was composed of 200,000 soldiers, [4] of which less than 1% were Spaniards. [5]

Although many Amerindian civilizations had developed sophisticated methods for working metals including gold, silver, bronze, tin and copper, this knowledge was applied mainly to the development of religious and artistic objects, as well as some household utensils for everyday use. Few metals were used by native populations for military applications. One exception was that the Quechuas and [[P'urh�pecha]] developed weapons of copper, but these could not match the hardness or durability of iron and steel. Most cultures used weapons of wood, flint and obsidian. The iron armor and helmets used by the Spanish were an important factor in their success. However, the refined textile technology of Andean civilizations, allowing tissues up to 500 threads per inch structured in successive layers, enabled them to develop efficient armor that was eventually adopted by the Spaniards, replacing their metal helmets and breastplates, as these were not suitable for tropical climates. The high heat and humidity of Central and South America made wearing such heavy iron and steel items impractical, and the humidity caused a significantly faster rate of corrosion than in Europe.

In their first contacts with native peoples, firearms and especially arquebuses were very effective in battles and made a great impression on morale because of the noise, light and smoke. But their military effectiveness was limited, partially due to their limited availability. The weapons and armor of steel and iron proved to be much more effective militarily. For this reason, when they took control of a nation the conquistadors usually banned possession of iron weapons by the subjugated peoples.

Animals were another military factor. On the one hand, the introduction of the horse to the American continents by the Spaniards in some cases allowed them to move quickly to a battlefield and to maneuver quickly once armies were engaged. But in mountains and jungles, the Spaniards were less technologically adapted than the Amerindian cultures, which had adapted techniques to build roads and bridges through such terrain. In some cases native peoples, mainly in North America such as the pampas and Patagonia, appropriated and developed techniques of horse training and riding such that they soon exceeded the skills of the Spaniards. This became a decisive factor in the native resistance to the Spanish. The Spaniards also used dogs to track and attack indigenous people and slaves in the jungle and forests. Horses and war dogs both were more effective as psychological weapons than physical ones against the natives who in many cases had never seen dogs, and none of whom had seen horses before. They both caused a great deal of terror amongst the natives.

The Spaniards' methods of war were similar to those of most Europeans, which were more bloody than Native American warriors were accustomed to. In addition, some native peoples did not carry out mass killing of enemies on the battlefield, but instead caught and held them for occasions of ritual sacrifices . Hence, European methods of warfare was often more brutal than what the native populations had been previously exposed to.

The main decisive factor in the defeat of Amerindian civilizations was their demographic collapse. Among researchers there is no consensus as to the cause of that collapse; some give genocide as the main cause, others attribute it to the introduction of new diseases and a still others to a combination of both factors. Scholars now believe that, among the various contributing factors, epidemic disease was the overwhelming cause of the population decline of the Native Americans because of their lack of immunity to new diseases brought from Europe.[5] The American researcher HF Dobyns [8] has estimated that 95% of the total population of Americas died in the first 130 years after the arrival of Columbus. Cook and Borak of the University of Berkeley claim that the population in Mexico declined from 25.2 million in 1518 to 700 thousand people in 1623, less than 3% of the original population. [9] In 1492 Spain and Portugal populations did not exceed 10 million people. [10] There is some consensus that the demographic collapse of the original population of Americas was the main cause of its military defeat . Disease decimating the population is commonly listed as the reason for this decline in population. This happened with the Inca Empire, defeated by Francisco Pizarro in 1531. The first epidemic of smallpox was recorded in 1529 and killed the emperor Huayna Capac, the father of Atahualpa, as well as a large portion of the population. New epidemics of smallpox broke out in 1533, 1535, 1558 and 1565, as well as typhus in 1546, influenza in 1558, diphtheria in 1614 and measles in 1618. [13] Dobyns estimated that 90% of the population of the Inca Empire died in these epidemics.

Finally, Jared Diamond summarizes the causes of the Pizarro's victory as "military technology based on firearms and steel and horses, infectious diseases endemic in Eurasia, European maritime technology, centralized political organization of States Europeans, and in writing. "[14] The significance of writing is attributed to the errors of judgement Atahualpa and Moctezuma, which led them to be deceived by the Spaniards since they belonged to a literate society. This allowed them to have at their disposal a huge body of knowledge about human behavior and its history, something that no native nations possessed.

See also

Notes

References

Bibliography