Order of the Bath

Order of the Bath

Badge of a Companion of the Order of the Bath (Military Division)
Awarded by the Queen of the United Kingdom
Type Order
Motto TRIA IUNCTA IN UNO
Awarded for At the monarch's pleasure
Status Currently constituted
Sovereign Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom
Grades Knight Grand Cross or Dame Grand Cross
Knight Commander or Dame Commander
Companion
Statistics
Established 18 May 1725
Precedence
Next (higher) Order of St. Patrick
Next (lower) Order of St Michael and St George
Order of the Bath UK ribbon.png
Ribbon bar of the Order of the Bath

The Most Honourable Order of the Bath (formerly The Most Honourable Military Order of the Bath)[1] is a British order of chivalry founded by George I on 18 May 1725.[2] The name derives from the medieval ceremony for creating a knight, which involved bathing (as a symbol of purification) as one of its elements. The knights so created were known as Knights of the Bath.[3] George I "erected the Knights of the Bath into a regular Military Order".[4] He did not (as is often stated) revive the Order of the Bath, since it had never previously existed as an Order, in the sense of a body of knights who were governed by a set of statutes and whose numbers were replenished when vacancies occurred.[5][6]

The Order consists of the Sovereign (currently HM Queen Elizabeth II), the Great Master (currently HRH The Prince of Wales),[7] and three Classes of members:[8]

Members belong to either the Civil or the Military Division.[9] Prior to 1815 the order had only a single class, Knights Companion (KB), which no longer exists.[10] Recipients of the Order are now usually senior military officers or senior civil servants.[11][12]

The Order of the Bath is the fourth-most senior of the British Orders of Chivalry, after The Most Noble Order of the Garter, The Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, and The Most Illustrious Order of St Patrick.[13] The last of the aforementioned Orders, which relates to Ireland, still exists but has been in disuse since the formation of the Irish Free State.[14]

Contents

History

Knights of the Bath

A painting by Edmund Leighton depicting a fictional scene of a knight receiving the accolade

In the Middle Ages knighthood was often conferred with elaborate ceremonies. These usually involved the knight-to-be taking a bath (possibly symbolic of spiritual purification)[15] during which he was instructed in the duties of knighthood by more senior knights. He was then put to bed in order to dry. Clothed in a special robe, he was led with music to the chapel where he spent the night in a vigil. At dawn he made confession and attended Mass, then retired to his bed to sleep until it was fully daylight. He was then brought before the King, who after instructing two senior knights to buckle the spurs to the knight-elect's heels, fastened a belt around his waist, then struck him on the neck (with either a hand or a sword), thus making him a knight.[16] It was this "accolade" which was the essential act in creating a knight, and a simpler ceremony developed, conferring knighthood merely by striking or touching the knight-to-be on the shoulder with a sword,[17] or "dubbing" him, as is still done today. In the early medieval period the difference seems to have been that the full ceremonies were used for men from more prominent families.[15]

From the coronation of Henry IV in 1399 the full ceremonies were restricted to major royal occasions such as coronations, investitures of the Prince of Wales or royal Dukes, and royal weddings,[18] and the knights so created became known as Knights of the Bath.[15] Knights Bachelor continued to be created with the simpler form of ceremony. The last occasion on which Knights of the Bath were created was the coronation of Charles II in 1661.[19]

From at least 1625,[20] and possibly from the reign of James I, Knights of the Bath were using the motto Tria iuncta in uno (Latin for "Three joined in one"), and wearing as a badge three crowns within a plain gold oval.[21] These were both subsequently adopted by the Order of the Bath; a similar design of badge is still worn by members of the Civil Division. Their symbolism however is not entirely clear. The 'three joined in one' may be a reference to the kingdoms of England, Scotland and either France or Ireland, which were held (or claimed in the case of France) by British monarchs. This would correspond to the three crowns in the badge.[22] Another explanation of the motto is that it refers to the Holy Trinity.[11] Nicolas quotes a source (although he is sceptical of it) who claims that prior to James I the motto was Tria numina iuncta in uno, (three powers/gods joined in one), but from the reign of James I the word numina was dropped and the motto understood to mean Tria [regna] iuncta in uno (three kingdoms joined in one).[23]

Sir Robert Walpole, the first Prime Minister, who used the Order of the Bath as a source of political patronage

Foundation of the Order

The prime mover in the establishment of the Order of the Bath was John Anstis, Garter King of Arms, England's highest heraldic officer. Sir Anthony Wagner, a recent holder of the office of Garter, wrote of Anstis's motivations:

“ It was Martin Leake's[24] opinion that the trouble and opposition Anstis met with in establishing himself as Garter so embittered him against the heralds that when at last in 1718 he succeeded, he made it his prime object to aggrandise himself and his office at their expense. It is clear at least that he set out to make himself indispensable to the Earl Marshal, which was not hard, their political principles being congruous and their friendship already established, but also to Sir Robert Walpole and the Whig ministry, which can by no means have been easy, considering his known attachment to the Pretender and the circumstances under which he came into office ... The main object of Anstis's next move, the revival or institution of the Order of the Bath was probably that which it in fact secured, of ingratiating him with the all-powerful Prime Minister Sir Robert Walpole.[25] ”

The use of honours in the early 18th century differed considerably from the modern honours system in which hundreds, if not thousands, of people each year receive honours on the basis of deserving accomplishments. The only honours available at that time were hereditary (not life) peerages and baronetcies, knighthoods and the Order of the Garter (or the Order of the Thistle for Scots), none of which were awarded in large numbers (the Garter and the Thistle are limited to 24 and 16 living members respectively.) The political environment was also significantly different from today:

“ The Sovereign still exercised a power to be reckoned with in the eighteenth century. The Court remained the centre of the political world. The King was limited in that he had to choose Ministers who could command a majority in Parliament, but the choice remained his. The leader of an administration still had to command the King's personal confidence and approval. A strong following in Parliament depended on being able to supply places, pensions, and other marks of Royal favour to the government's supporters.[26] ”

The attraction of the new Order for Walpole was that it would provide a source of such favours to strengthen his political position.[27] George I having agreed to Walpole's proposal, Anstis was commissioned to draft statutes for the Order of the Bath. As noted above, he adopted the motto and badge used by the Knights of the Bath, as well as the colour of the riband and mantle, and the ceremony for creating a knight. The rest of the statutes were mostly based on those of the Order of the Garter, of which he was an officer (as Garter King of Arms).[28] The Order was founded by letters patent under the Great Seal dated 18 May 1725, and the statutes issued the following week.[29][30]

The Order initially consisted of the Sovereign, a Prince of the blood Royal as Principal Knight, a Great Master and thirty-five Knights Companion.[31] Seven officers (see below) were attached to the Order. These provided yet another opportunity for political patronage, as they were to be sinecures at the disposal of the Great Master, supported by fees from the knights. Despite the fact that the Bath was represented as a military Order, only a few military officers were among the initial appointments (see List of Knights Companion of the Order of the Bath). They may be broken down into categories as follows (note that some are classified in more than one category):[32]

Admiral George Rodney (appointed a Knight Companion in 1780) wearing the riband and star of the Order

The majority of the new Knights Companion were knighted by the King and invested with their ribands and badges on 27 May 1725.[33] Although the statutes set out the full medieval ceremony which was to be used for creating knights, this was not performed, and indeed was possibly never intended to be, as the original statutes contained a provision[34] allowing the Great Master to dispense Knights Companion from these requirements. The original knights were dispensed from all the medieval ceremonies with the exception of the Installation, which was performed in the Order's Chapel, the Henry VII Chapel in Westminster Abbey, on June 17. This precedent was followed until 1812, after which the Installation was also dispensed with, until its revival in the twentieth century.[35] The ceremonies however remained part of the Statutes until 1847.[36]

Although the initial appointments to the Order were largely political, from the 1770s appointments to the Order were increasingly made for naval, military or diplomatic achievements. This is partly due to the conflicts Britain was engaged in over this period.[37][19] The Peninsular War resulted in so many deserving candidates for the Bath that a statute was issued allowing the appointment of Extra Knights in time of war, who were to be additional to the numerical limits imposed by the statutes, and whose number was not subject to any restrictions.[38] Another statute, this one issued some 80 years earlier, had also added a military note to the Order. Each knight was required, under certain circumstances, to supply and support four men-at-arms for a period not exceeding 42 days in any year, to serve in any part of Great Britain.[39] This company was to be captained by the Great Master, who had to supply four trumpeters, and was also to appoint eight officers for this body, however the statute was never invoked.[33]

Restructuring in 1815

In 1815, with the end of the Napoleonic Wars, the Prince Regent (later George IV) expanded the Order of the Bath

“ to the end that those Officers who have had the opportunities of signalising themselves by eminent services during the late war may share in the honours of the said Order, and that their names may be delivered down to remote posterity, accompanied by the marks of distinction which they have so nobly earned.[10] ”

The Order was now to consist of three classes: Knights Grand Cross, Knights Commander, and Companions. The existing Knights Companion (of which there were 60)[40] became Knight Grand Cross; this class was limited to 72 members, of which twelve could be appointed for civil or diplomatic services. The military members had to be of the rank of at least Major-General or Rear Admiral. The Knights Commander were limited to 180, exclusive of foreign nationals holding British commissions, up to ten of whom could be appointed as honorary Knights Commander. They had to be of the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel or Post-Captain. The number of Companions was not specified, but they had to have received a medal or been mentioned in despatches since the start of the war in 1803. A list of about 500 names was subsequently published.[41] Two further officers were appointed, an "Officer of arms attendant on the Knights Commanders and Companions", and a "Secretary appertaining to the Knights Commanders and Companions"[10] The large increase in numbers caused some complaints that such an expansion would reduce the prestige of the Order.[11]

Knights Grand Cross wear their mantles over suits in modern times. During the nineteenth century, as depicted above, they wore them over imitations of seventeenth century dress.

The Victorian era

In 1847 Queen Victoria issued new statutes eliminating all references to an exclusively military Order. As well as removing the word 'Military' from the full name of the Order, this opened up the grades of Knight Commander and Companion to civil appointments, and the Military and Civil Divisions of the Order were established. New numerical limits were imposed, and the opportunity also taken to regularise the 1815 expansion of the Order.[42][43] The 1847 statutes also abolished all the medieval ritual, however they did introduce a formal Investiture ceremony, conducted by the Sovereign wearing the Mantle and insignia of the Order, attended by the Officers and as many GCBs as possible, in their Mantles.[44]

In 1859 a further edition of the Statutes was issued; the changes related mainly to the costs associated with the Order. Prior to this date it had been the policy that the insignia (which were provided by the Crown) were to be returned on the death of the holder; the exception had been foreigners who had been awarded honorary membership. In addition foreigners had usually been provided with stars made of silver and diamonds, whereas ordinary members had only embroidered stars. The decision was made to award silver stars to all members, and only require the return of the Collar. The Crown had also been paying the fees due to the officers of the Order for members who had been appointed for the services in the recent war. The fees were abolished and replaced with a salary of approximately the same average value. The offices of Genealogist and Messenger were abolished, and those of Registrar and Secretary combined.[45]

The 20th century

In 1910 after his accession to the throne George V ordered the revival of the Installation ceremony,[19] perhaps prompted by the first Installation ceremony of the more junior Order of St Michael and St George, held a few years earlier,[46] and the building of a new chapel for the Order of the Thistle in 1911.[47] The Installation ceremony took place on 22 July 1913 in the Henry VII Chapel,[48][49] and Installations have been held at regular intervals since. Prior to the 1913 Installation it was necessary to adapt the chapel to accommodate the larger number of members. An appeal was made to the members of the Order, and following the Installation a surplus remained. A Committee was formed from the Officers to administer the 'Bath Chapel Fund', and over time this committee has come to consider other matters than purely financial ones.[50]

Another revision of the statutes of the Order was undertaken in 1925, to consolidate the 41 additional statutes which had been issued since the 1859 revision.[51]

Women were admitted to the Order in 1971.[19] In 1975, Princess Alice, Duchess of Gloucester, an aunt of Elizabeth II, became the first to reach the highest rank, Dame Grand Cross.[19] Princess Alice (whose maiden name was Lady Alice Douglas-Montagu-Scott) was a direct descendant of the Order's first Great Master,[52] and her husband, who had died the previous year, had also held that office.

Senior civil servants, such as permanent secretaries, and senior members of the armed forces, such as generals, are often appointed to the order. Civil servants associated with the Foreign Office, including ambassadors, are usually appointed to the Order of St Michael and St George.

Composition

Sovereign

The British Sovereign is the Sovereign of the Order of the Bath. As with all honours except those in the Sovereign's personal gift,[53] the Sovereign makes all appointments to the Order on the advice of the Government.

Great Master

The next-most senior member of the Order is the Great Master, of which there have been nine:

Originally a Prince of the Blood Royal, as the Principal Knight Companion, ranked next after the sovereign.[63] This position was joined to that of the Great Master in the statutes of 1847.[64] The Great Master and Principal Knight is now either a descendant of George I or "some other exalted personage"; the holder of the office has custody of the seal of the order and is responsible for enforcing the statutes.[9]

Members

Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Johns, wearing the star, riband and badge of a military Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath

The statutes also provide for the following:[19]

Regular membership is limited to citizens of the United Kingdom and of Commonwealth countries. Members appointed to the Civil Division must "by their personal services to [the] crown or by the performance of public duties have merited ... royal favour."[65] Appointments to the Military Division are restricted by the rank of the individual. GCBs must hold the rank of Rear Admiral, Major General or Air Vice Marshal.[66] KCBs must hold the rank of Captain in the Royal Navy, Colonel in the Army or Royal Marines, or Group Captain in the Royal Air Force.[67] CBs must be of the rank of Lieutenant Commander, Major or Squadron Leader, and in addition must have been mentioned in despatches for distinction in a command position in a combat situation. Non-line officers (e.g. engineers, medics) may be appointed only for meritorious service in war time.[68]

Non-Commonwealth foreigners may be made Honorary Members.[69] Queen Elizabeth II has established the custom of awarding an honorary GCB to visiting heads of state, for example Gustav Heinemann (in 1972),[70] Ronald Reagan (in 1989), Lech Wałęsa (in 1991)[19], Fernando Henrique Cardoso, George H. W. Bush (in 1993)[71], Nicolas Sarkozy in March 2008,[72] Turkish President Abdullah Gül,[73] and most recently, Slovenian President Dr Danilo Türk.[74] Foreign generals are also often given honorary appointments to the Order, for example Georgy Zhukov,[75] Dwight D. Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur during World War II,[76] and Norman Schwarzkopf[77] and Colin Powell[78] after the Gulf War. A more controversial member of the Order was Robert Mugabe, whose honour was stripped by the Queen, on the advice of Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, on 25 June 2008 as "as a mark of revulsion at the abuse of human rights and abject disregard for the democratic process in Zimbabwe over which President Mugabe has presided." [79]

Honorary members do not count towards the numerical limits in each class.[80] In addition the statutes allow the Sovereign to exceed the limits in time of war or other exceptional circumstances.[81]

Officers

The Order of the Bath now has six officers:[82]

The office of Dean is held by the Dean of Westminster. The King of Arms, responsible for heraldry, is known as the Bath King of Arms; he is not, however, a member of the College of Arms, like many heralds. The Order's Usher is known as the Gentleman Usher of the Scarlet Rod; he does not, unlike his Order of the Garter equivalent (the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod) perform any duties in the House of Lords.

There were originally seven officers, each of whom was to receive fees from the Knights Companion both on appointment and annually thereafter. The office of Messenger was abolished in 1859.[45] The office of Genealogist was abolished at the same time, but revived in 1913.[87] The offices of Registrar and Secretary were formally merged in 1859, although the two positions had been held concurrently for the previous century.[88] An Officer of Arms and a Secretary for the Knights Commander and Companions were established in 1815,[10] but abolished in 1847.[89] The office of Deputy Secretary was created in 1925.

Under the Hanoverian kings certain of the officers also held heraldic office. The office of Blanc Coursier Herald of Arms was attached to that of the Genealogist, Brunswick Herald of Arms to the Gentleman Usher, and Bath King of Arms was also made Gloucester King of Arms with heraldic jurisdiction over Wales.[90] This was the result of a move by Anstis to give the holders of these sinecures greater security; the offices of the Order of the Bath were held at the pleasure of the Great Master, while appointments to the heraldic offices were made by the King under the Great Seal and were for life.[91]

Vestments and accoutrements

The insignia of a Knight Grand Cross of the civil division of the order.

Members of the Order wear elaborate costumes on important occasions (such as its quadrennial installation ceremonies and coronations), which vary by rank:

On lesser occasions, simpler insignia are used:

The insignia of a Knight Grand Cross of the military division of the order.

On certain "collar days" designated by the Sovereign, members attending formal events may wear the Order's collar over their military uniform or eveningwear. When collars are worn (either on collar days or on formal occasions such as coronations), the badge is suspended from the collar.[92]

The collars and badges of Knights and Dames Grand Cross are returned to the Central Chancery of the Orders of Knighthood upon the decease of their owners. All other insignia may be retained by their owners.[92]

Chapel

Westminster Abbey with a procession of Knights of the Bath, by Canaletto, 1749.

The Chapel of the Order is Henry VII Lady Chapel in Westminster Abbey.[95] Every four years, an installation ceremony, presided over by the Great Master, and a religious service are held in the Chapel; the Sovereign attends every alternate ceremony. The last such service was in May 2006 and was attended by the Sovereign.[19] The Sovereign and each knight who has been installed is allotted a stall in the choir of the chapel. Since there are a limited number of stalls in the Chapel, only the most senior Knights and Dames Grand Cross are installed. A stall made vacant by the death of a military Knight Grand Cross is offered to the next most senior uninstalled military GCB, and similarly for vacancies among civil GCBs.[95] Waits between admission to the Order and installation may be very long; for instance, Marshal of the Air Force Lord Craig of Radley was created a Knight Grand Cross in 1984, but was not installed until 2006.[19]

Above each stall, the occupant's heraldic devices are displayed. Perched on the pinnacle of a knight's stall is his helm, decorated with a mantling and topped by his crest. Under English heraldic law, women other than monarchs do not bear helms or crests; instead, the coronet appropriate to the dame's rank (if she is a peer or member of the Royal family) is used.[95]

Above the crest or coronet, the knight's or dame's heraldic banner is hung, emblazoned with his or her coat of arms. At a considerably smaller scale, to the back of the stall is affixed a piece of brass (a "stall plate") displaying its occupant's name, arms and date of admission into the Order.

Upon the death of a Knight, the banner, helm, mantling and crest (or coronet or crown) are taken down. The stall plates, however, are not removed; rather, they remain permanently affixed somewhere about the stall, so that the stalls of the chapel are festooned with a colourful record of the Order's Knights (and now Dames) throughout history.

When the grade of Knight Commander was established in 1815 the regulations specified that they too should have a banner and stall plate affixed in the chapel.[10] This was never implemented (despite some of the KCBs paying the appropriate fees) primarily due to lack of space,[96] although the 1847 statutes allow all three classes to request the erection of a plate in the chapel bearing the member's name, date of nomination, and (for the two higher classes) optionally the coat of arms.[97]

Precedence and privileges

Members of the Order of the Bath are assigned positions in the order of precedence.[98] Wives of male members also feature on the order of precedence, as do sons, daughters and daughters-in-law of Knights Grand Cross and Knights Commander; relatives of female members, however, are not assigned any special precedence. Generally, individuals can derive precedence from their fathers or husbands, but not from their mothers or wives. (See order of precedence in England and Wales for the exact positions.)

Knights Grand Cross and Knights Commander prefix "Sir," and Dames Grand Cross and Dames Commander prefix "Dame," to their forenames.[99] Wives of Knights may prefix "Lady" to their surnames, but no equivalent privilege exists for husbands of Dames. Such forms are not used by peers and princes, except when the names of the former are written out in their fullest forms. Furthermore, honorary members and clergymen do not receive the accolade of knighthood.

Knights and Dames Grand Cross use the post-nominal "GCB"; Knights Commander use "KCB"; Dames Commander use "DCB"; Companions use "CB".[100]

Knights and Dames Grand Cross are also entitled to receive heraldic supporters.[101] Furthermore, they may encircle their arms with a depiction of the circlet (a red circle bearing the motto) with the badge pendant thereto and the collar; the former is shown either outside or on top of the latter.

Knights and Dames Commander and Companions may display the circlet, but not the collar, around their arms. The badge is depicted suspended from the collar or circlet. Members of the Military division may encompass the circlet with "two laurel branches issuant from an escrol azure inscribed Ich dien", as appears on the badge.

Revocation

It is possible for membership in the Order to be revoked. Under the 1725 statutes the grounds for this were heresy, high treason, or fleeing from battle out of cowardice. Knights Companion could in such cases be degraded at the next Chapter meeting. It was then the duty of the Gentleman Usher to "pluck down the escocheon [i.e. stallplate] of such knight and spurn it out of the chapel" with "all the usual marks of infamy".[102] Only two people were ever degraded — Lord Cochrane in 1813 and General Sir Eyre Coote in 1816, both for political reasons, rather than any of the grounds given in the statute. Lord Cochrane was subsequently reinstated, Coote had died a few years after his degradation.[103]

Under Queen Victoria's 1847 statutes a member "convicted of treason, cowardice, felony, or any infamous crime derogatory to his honour as a knight or gentleman, or accused and does not submit to trial in a reasonable time, shall be degraded from the Order by a special ordinance signed by the sovereign". The Sovereign was to be the sole judge, and also had the power to restore such members.[104]

The situation today is that membership may be cancelled or annulled, and the entry in the register erased, by an ordinance signed by the Sovereign and sealed with the seal of the Order, on the recommendation of the appropriate Minister. Such cancellations may be subsequently reversed.[105]

William Pottinger, a senior civil servant, lost both his Companionship of the Order of the Bath and CVO in 1975 when he was gaoled for corruptly receiving gifts from the architect John Poulson.[106]

Romanian president Nicolae Ceauşescu was stripped of his honorary GCB by Queen Elizabeth II on 24 December 1989.

Robert Mugabe, President of Zimbabwe, was stripped of his honorary GCB by the Queen, on the advice of Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, on 25 June 2008 as "as a mark of revulsion at the abuse of human rights and abject disregard for the democratic process in Zimbabwe over which President Mugabe has presided."

See also

For people who have been appointed to the Order of the Bath, see the following categories:

Notes

  1. ↑ The word 'Military' was removed from the name by Queen Victoria in 1847. Letters Patent dated 14 April 1847, quoted in Statutes 1847
  2. ↑ Statutes 1725, although Risk says 11 May
  3. ↑ Anstis, Observations, p4
  4. ↑ Letters patent dated 18 May 1725, quoted in Statutes 1725
  5. ↑ Wagner, Heralds of England, p 357, referring to John Anstis, who proposed the Order, says: "He had the happy inspiration of reviving this ancient name and chivalric associations, but attaching it, as it never had been before, to an Order or company of knights."
  6. ↑ Perkins, The Most Honourable Order of the Bath, p1 "It can scarcely be claimed that a properly constituted Order existed at any time during the preceding centuries [prior to the reign of Charles II]"
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 London Gazette: no. 46428, page 12559, 10 December 1974. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  8. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 2
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Statutes 1925, article 5
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 London Gazette: no. 16972, page 17, 4 January 1815. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 "www.royal.gov.uk article on the Order of the Bath as part of the Honours System". Retrieved on 2006-09-09.
  12. ↑ Statutes 1925, articles 8–12
  13. ↑ See, for example, the order of wear for orders and decorations, the Royal Warrant defining precedence in Scotland (London Gazette: no. 27774, pages 2012–2014, 14 March 1905. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.) or the discussion of precedence at http://www.heraldica.org/topics/britain/order_precedence.htm
  14. ↑ "www.royal.gov.uk article on the Order of St Patrick". Retrieved on 2006-09-09.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Risk, History of the Order of the Bath, p6
  16. ↑ The Manner of making Knights after the custom of England in time of peace and at the Coronation, that is Knights of the Bath, quoted in Perkins, pp 5–14
  17. ↑ According to Anstis (Observations, p73) such knights were sometimes known as Knights of the Sword or Knights of the Carpet
  18. ↑ Anstis, p66
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.6 19.7 19.8 "www.royal.gov.uk feature article on the Order of the Bath". Retrieved on 2006-09-09.
  20. ↑ Risk, p114
  21. ↑ Nicolas, History of the orders of knighthood of the British empire, p38–9
  22. ↑ The later usage by the Order of the Bath does not make things any clearer. The presence of the rose, thistle and shamrock (symbols of England, Scotland and Ireland respectively) in the Collar supports the above claim. The shamrocks however were not added until the 19th century, probably as a result of a suggestion of Sir Joseph Banks, who in his proposal observed that the presence of the shamrock would "greatly augment the meaning of the motto" (Risk, p 115). A further explanation for the crowns is provided in the 1725 statutes of the Order. The coat of arms which was to appear on the Order's seal (Azure three imperial crowns Or, that is, three gold imperial crowns on a blue background) was described as being anciently attributed to King Arthur.
  23. ↑ Nicolas, p 38, quoting Bishop Kennet Register and Chronicle Ecclesiastical and Civil from the Restoration of King Charles II faithfully taken from the manuscripts of the Lord Bishop of Peterborough, (1728) p410
  24. ↑ Garter King of Arms from 1754 to 1773, and an officer of arms for some 25 years before that
  25. ↑ Wagner, pp348, 357
  26. ↑ Risk, p2
  27. ↑ In the words of his son, Horace Walpole, "The Revival of the Order of the Bath was a measure of Sir Robert Walpole, and was an artful bank of favours in lieu of places. He meant to stave off the demand for Garters, and intended that the Red [i.e. the Order of the Bath] should be a step to the Blue [the Order of the Garter]; and accordingly took one of the former for himself." Horace Walpole, Reminiscences (1788)
  28. ↑ Nicolas, p237–8, Footnote
  29. ↑ Risk, p4
  30. ↑ Statutes 1725
  31. ↑ Statutes 1725, article 2
  32. ↑ Risk, p15,16
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 Risk, p16
  34. ↑ Statutes 1725, article 6, the same article which state "[the Great Master shall] take especial care that ... the antient Rituals belonging to this Knighthood be observed with the greatest Exactness"
  35. ↑ No Installation had been held between 1812 and the coronation of George IV in 1821, by which time the number of knights exceeded the number of stalls in the chapel. In order to allow the knights to wear their collars at the coronation (which they could not do until installed) they were dispensed from the Installation, and this precedent was subsequently followed. (Risk, p43)
  36. ↑ Risk, p10
  37. ↑ Risk, p20
  38. ↑ Statute dated 8 May 1812, quoted in Statutes 1847
  39. ↑ Statute dated 20 April 1727, quoted in Statutes 1847
  40. ↑ The Times, 10 January 1815, p3
  41. ↑ London Gazette: no. 17061, pages 1877–1882, 16 September 1815. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  42. ↑ Letters Patent dated 14 April 1847
  43. ↑ The document by which the Prince Regent modified the structure of the Order in 1815 was a Warrant under the Royal sign-manual. This is of lesser authority than Letters Patent under the Great Seal, by which the Order and its Statutes were originally established. It had been questioned on a number of occasions whether the Statutes of the Order could be modified by anything less than such Letters Patent. The 1847 Letters Patent retroactively confirmed the validity of the 1815 document and the subsequent appointments to the Order
  44. ↑ Risk, p61
  45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 Risk, p70
  46. ↑ Risk, p89
  47. ↑ Perkins, p122
  48. ↑ Risk, p92
  49. ↑ Perkins, p124–131
  50. ↑ Risk, p95–6
  51. ↑ 16 in Queen Victoria's reign, 6 in Edward VII's and 19 in George V's. (Risk, p97)
  52. ↑ Risk, p102
  53. ↑ The Order of the Garter, the Order of the Thistle, the Order of Merit and the Royal Victorian Order
  54. ↑ London Gazette: no. 6376, page 1, 25 May 1725. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  55. ↑ Nicolas, Appendix p. lxx gives the first four Great Masters, although he considers the latter three to have only been acting Great Masters
  56. ↑ London Gazette: no. 19570, page 3309, 19 December 1837. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  57. ↑ London Gazette: no. 19592, page 407, 23 February 1838. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  58. ↑ Prince Albert was appointed acting Great Master sometime in 1843, and the appointment was made substantive by the 1847 Statutes, article 4. Risk says that he was appointed acting Great Master on March 31, 1843, however The Times, reporting the death of the Duke of Sussex (22 April 1843, pp4–5) says that the office of acting Great Master became vacant on his death. At any rate when the executors of the Duke of Sussex delivered his insignia together with the seal and statutes to the Queen on 20 June (The Times, 21 June 1843, p6) Prince Albert was then acting Great Master.
  59. ↑ London Gazette: no. 20737, pages 1947–1957, 25 May 1847. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  60. ↑ The Times, 22 June 1897, p10
  61. ↑ London Gazette: no. 27289, page 1414, 26 February 1901. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  62. ↑ The Times, 25 February 1942, p7
  63. ↑ Statutes 1725, article 4
  64. ↑ Letters Patent dated 14 April 1847, quoted in Statutes 1847
  65. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 9
  66. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 8
  67. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 10
  68. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 12
  69. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 15
  70. ↑ The Times, 25 October 1972, p21
  71. ↑ The Times, 1 December 1993, p24
  72. ↑ Nicolas Sarkozy awarded honorary title
  73. ↑ "Queen cherishes UK-Turkey ties" (in Turkish). Turkish Daily News. Retrieved on 2008-05-15.
  74. ↑ Queen begins state visit to Slovenia, BBC, 21 October 2008. Retrieved on 22 October 2008.
  75. ↑ The Times, Issue 50193; 13 July 1945; pg. 4; col A
  76. ↑ The Times, 27 May 1943, p4
  77. ↑ The Times, 21 May 1991
  78. ↑ "Biography of Colin Powell". Retrieved on 2006-09-09.
  79. ↑ Queen strips Robert Mugabe of knighthood in 'revulsion' at violence
  80. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 18
  81. ↑ "In the event of any future wars or of any action or services civil or military meriting peculiar honour and reward...to increase the numbers in any of the said classes and in any of the said divisions". Statutes 1925, article 17
  82. ↑ Court Circular, 17 May 2006
  83. ↑ London Gazette: no. 55568, page 8229, 30 July 1999. Retrieved on 2008-10-14.
  84. ↑ 84.0 84.1 Court Circular, 13 June 2006
  85. ↑ 85.0 85.1 London Gazette: no. 58010, page 8073, 13 June 2006. Retrieved on 2008-10-14.
  86. ↑ London Gazette: no. 54193, page 14335, 24 October 1995. Retrieved on 2007-12-21.
  87. ↑ Risk, p93
  88. ↑ Risk, pp13, 70
  89. ↑ Statutes 1847, article 15
  90. ↑ Statute dated 17 January 1726 (according to Risk, p14). Both the 1812 and 1847 editions of the Statutes give the date as 17 January 1725, but this is most probably a misprint since the Order was not founded until May 1725, and the additional statute also specified the office holders by name.
  91. ↑ Risk, p14
  92. ↑ 92.0 92.1 92.2 92.3 92.4 92.5 92.6 92.7 92.8 Statutes 1925, article 23
  93. ↑ The hat was formerly of white satin (Statutes 1725, article 8), but was changed to black velvet at the command of George IV for his coronation (Nicolas, p198). The hat is not explicitly specified in the 1847 or 1925 statutes
  94. ↑ Statutes 1925, articles 23,24,25
  95. ↑ 95.0 95.1 95.2 Statutes 1925, article 21
  96. ↑ Risk, p40
  97. ↑ Statutes 1847, article 18
  98. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 22
  99. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 20
  100. ↑ www.honours.gov.uk summary of the Orders of Chivalry. The post-nominal letters are not mentioned in the Statutes of the Order
  101. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 28
  102. ↑ Statutes 1725 art 3
  103. ↑ Risk, p30
  104. ↑ Statutes 1847, article 26
  105. ↑ Statutes 1925, article 30
  106. ↑ London Gazette: no. 46561, page 5731, 2 May 1975. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.

References

External links

Orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom
Current orders
Garter · Thistle · Bath · St. Michael and St. George · Distinguished Service · Royal Victorian · Merit · Imperial Service · British Empire · Companions of Honour
Former orders
St. Patrick · Royal Guelphic · Star of India · Indian Empire · British India · Indian Merit · Crown of India · Victoria and Albert · Burma
Other honours
Hereditary peerage · Life peerage · Privy Counsellor · Baronet · Knighthood · St. John · ADC · more
See also : Revocations