Binomial nomenclature

In biology, binomial nomenclature is the formal system of naming species. The system is called binominal nomenclature (particularly in zoological circles), binary nomenclature (particularly in botanical circles), or the binomial classification system. The essence of it is that each species name is in (modern scientific) Latin and has two parts, so that it is popularly known as the "Latin name" of the species, although this terminology is frowned upon by biologists and philologists, who prefer the phrase scientific name. Instead of using the seven-category system in naming an organism, Linnaeus chose to use a two-word naming system. He adopted the binomial nomenclature scheme, using only the genus name and the species. For example, humans belong to genus Homo and species sapiens. Humans are then classified by Linnaeus as Homo sapiens. Note that the first name, genus, begins with a capital letter, while the second with a small letter.

The species is the lowest rank in the system for classifying organisms.

Contents

History

The adoption of a system of binomial nomenclature is due to Swedish botanist and physician Carolus Linnaeus (1707 – 1778) who attempted to describe the entire known natural world and gave every species (mineral, vegetable or animal) a two-part name. However, binomial nomenclature in various forms existed before Linnaeus, and was used by the Bauhins, who lived nearly two hundred years before Linnaeus. Before Linnaeus, hardly anybody used binomial nomenclature. After Linnaeus, almost everybody did.

Value of binomial nomenclature

The value of the binomial nomenclature system derives primarily from its economy, its widespread use, and the stability of names it generally favors:

Despite the rules favoring stability and uniqueness, in practice a single species may have several scientific names in circulation, depending largely on taxonomic point of view (see synonymy).

Derivation of names

The genus name and specific descriptor may come from any source. Often they are ordinary New Latin words, but they may also come from Ancient Greek, from a place, from a person (often a naturalist), a name from the local language, etc. In fact, taxonomists come up with specific descriptors from a variety of sources, including inside-jokes and puns.

However, names are always treated grammatically as if they were a Latin phrase.

There is a list of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names.

Family names are often derived from a common genus within the family.

The genus name must be unique inside each kingdom. It is not normally a noun in its Latin grammar.

The specific descriptor is also a Latin word but it can be grammatically any of various forms including these:

Specific descriptors are commonly reused (as is shown by examples of hodgsonii above).

Codes of nomenclature

From the mid nineteenth century onwards it became ever more apparent that a body of rules was necessary to govern scientific names. In the course of time these became Nomenclature Codes governing the naming of animals (ICZN), plants (incl. Fungi, cyanobacteria) (ICBN), bacteria (ICNB) and viruses (ICTV). These Codes differ.

A BioCode has been suggested to replace several codes, although implementation is not in sight. There also is debate concerning development of a PhyloCode to name clades of phylogenetic trees, rather than taxa. Proponents of the PhyloCode use the name "Linnaean Codes" for the joint existing Codes and "Linnaean taxonomy" for the scientific classification that uses these existing Codes.

Rules

Although the fine detail will differ, there are certain aspects which are universally adopted:

For example, the entire tiger species is Panthera tigris
For example: Amaranthus retroflexus L. or Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) — the latter was originally described as member of the genus Fringilla, hence the parentheses.
For example, "The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is decreasing in Europe."
For example: "Canis sp.", meaning "one species of the genus Canis".
For example Corvus cf. splendens indicates "a bird similar to the House Crow but not certainly identified as this species".

See also

References

  1. Sneath, P. H. A.. "A short history of the Bacteriological Code". Retrieved on 2007-10-29.
  2. Heather Silyn-Roberts (2000). Writing for Science and Engineering: Papers, Presentation. pp. 198. ISBN 0750646365. http://books.google.com/books?id=hVUU7Gq8QskC&pg=PA198&lpg=PA198&dq=species+epithet+capitalize&source=web&ots=ZfKJlIi2wd&sig=Bj1UD_8qwoWdEmjL5IXIQycEeF8&hl=en. 
  3. "Recommendation 60F". International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Vienna Code 60F.1 (2006).
  4. Charles F. Sturm, Timothy A. Pearce, Ángel Valdés (editors) (2006). The Mollusks: A Guide to Their Study, Collection, and Preservation. pp. 147. ISBN 1581129300. http://books.google.com/books?id=-NbmHx93s8gC&pg=PA147&lpg=PA147&dq=species+epithet+capitalize&source=web&ots=DqxqYpdRTL&sig=RkDBs-KOTTGUHehyft5IsXU9Tfc&hl=en. 
  5. Frank A. Bisby, Plant Names in Botanical Databases, Plant Taxonomic Database Standards No. 3, Version 1.00, December 1994, Published for the International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences (TDWG) by the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

External links