Talk:Zurich Financial Services
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Who is the user, Zurich Financial Services, who is making edits to this article?
Why is some user with the same name making edits to this article? Ronbo76 08:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ronbo76. Please let me know who you are. I am working in the Global Media Team in the Corporate Center of Zurich Financial Services and the Head of Global Communications ordered me to update the page in the way I did and I will have to change it back again. Please let me know what your motives are. editor of Zurich Financial Services
I work in Zurich North America. I'm pretty sure the acquisition of Universal Underwriters, Fidelity & Deposit, Colonial Amer. Cas. Co., and the Maryland Companies were later than 1976. I know they show up in loss triangles of more recent data.
[edit] History section
The history timeline was a direct copy of http://www.zurich.com/main/aboutus/history/chronology.htm, so I removed it as a copyright violation. --Finngall talk 16:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Dear Finngal I have put the history back in because first ZFS approved of putting it here and second it is not identical with the one of our homepage (it is longer). I also deleted the criticizm because it does not belong on this page. I am working in the Global Media Team in Corporate Center of Zurich Financial Services. Thank you for accepting these Changes. Lisa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.28.224.33 (talk)
- I put criticism section back into the article. I'm sorry to inform you that the staff of ZFS does not determine what content goes in this article, any sourced material may be included regardless of whether or not it's 'inconvenient' to the PR staff at your company. Removing further referenced material will result in your editing privledges being blocked. Trusilver 16:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Zurich Financial.PNG
Image:Zurich Financial.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] This article is very poor quality
This is in no way a balanced or thorough article about Zurich Insurance. Zurich is a very large company, with a long history, and employs thousands of people. This page should be improved to a level of quality and content equivalent to the other large commercial carriers in the US and global market (such as AIG). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.252.74.48 (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
