User talk:Zshriram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability of Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan

A tag has been placed on Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 03:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jeevanvidya.info/. As a copyright violation, Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 13:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Donating copyright material

I am responsing to your note on Talk:Jeevan Vidya Madhyastha Darshan. As noted in the copyright problem notice above, if you own the copyright to the material you can send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL. Please see WP:DCP for a fuller explanation of the process.

Note that even after permission has been established to re-use the material, the article still needs to meet notability, reliable sources, verifiability. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)