User talk:Zpek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:GraffyWall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GraffyWall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 23:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

GraffyWall

A tag has been placed on GraffyWall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:GraffyWall. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Blanchardb (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of WebCanvas

A tag has been placed on WebCanvas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. freshacconcispeaktome 12:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:WebCanvas Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WebCanvas Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of WebCanvas

A tag has been placed on WebCanvas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dougie WII (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Webcanvas transp.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Webcanvas transp.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. freshacconcispeaktome 22:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of WebCanvas

I have nominated WebCanvas, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebCanvas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dougie WII (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

The article WebCanvas was deleted several times because it failed to provide independent evaluation of notability by citing references from independent reputable sources. Please don't insist on inserting its description somewhere else without addressing the major concern. It is suggested that you are the author of the project or affiliated with it. If this is so, please read wikipedia rules about conflict of interest. `'Míkka>t 23:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re: Infinite canvas

My previous post here basically says it all. Also, wikipedia is not web directory. The article "Spoon" does not list all restaurants where spoons are used. Implemetations declared to be notable for one reason of another in reputable sources (with provided references, see wikipedia:Attribution) are welcome. I have no interest in the subject whatsoever. I randomly stumbled upon it and my goal is to maintain reasonable wikipedia standards in the article while it is low on the radar of possible experts in the subject. `'Míkka>t 01:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)