User talk:Ziqidel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

Welcome, Ziqidel!


Hello, Ziqidel, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Snozzer, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help pages
  Tutorial
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

[edit] Comrade General

Hey - about Comrade General - I'm erasing it again - please see its talk page; I have proposed a solution if you believe the information in the article is valid and necessary. Thanks, The Fish 10:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia's Top Rule

Rule 1 of Wikipedia is do not include any information that is not official, and that rule should be held above all others. I will follow it strictly. However, although official information is better than invented information, true information is even better (but true information is banned in all cases where it isn't official due to the general corruption of Human Civilisation).

As a note: I would expect anyone reading the above to think I was saying it "angrily", but in fact I wasn't. Also I would expect people to think the term "true is better than official" to be an opinion, when it is actually a fact that requires as much proof as "1+1=2" does.

[edit] The solution to the mystery of the mind

The simplest way to put this is that there are four ways of thinking about what is right and what is wrong. Take creation and destruction as an example:

Way 1 (Corrupt way of thinking):-
Liking creation is good
Hating creation is bad
Liking destruction is good
Hating destruction is bad

Way 2 (Evil way of thinking):-
Liking creation is bad
Hating creation is good
Liking destruction is bad
Hating destruction is good

Way 3 (Insane way of thinking):-
Liking creation is bad
Hating creation is good
Liking destruction is good
Hating destruction is bad

Way 4 (Correct way of thinking):-
Liking creation is good
Hating creation is bad
Liking destruction is bad
Hating destruction is good

Most people think in the Corrupt way, where hating anything is bad and liking anything is good - for example "liking something which is obscene" is a good thing, and "hating something which is about to destroy everything you hold dear" is a bad thing.

If everyone had the Correct way of thinking, the world would be a substantial lot better than it is at the moment.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Comrade General has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 20:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)