From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

I would actually vote for deletion, but reckoned that I had too little knowledge about movies to claim that this was insignificant. So.

And how on earth does one post on a Talk page? It's hardly intuitive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dnwq (talk • contribs)

You have just posted on a talk page. Movies/films with IMDb (Internet Movie Database) numbers are normally notable enough for inclusion in the wiki. Alf 15:18, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Well, the movie is notable because it portrays school shooters from their perspective. It is notable because few movies look into the topic of school shootings like this one does. Not to mention the fact that Hollywood are afraid to acknowledge Columbine and school violence, and therefore never make movies about it. Perhaps it is because these school shooting very rarely, if ever, have the cliched happy-ending that the mainstream seems to always want. —Preceding unsigned comment added by REN (talk • contribs)

Heya I am aware of the laws I break here but I live in Australia and therefore have little to no access to this movie, so therefore I ask: Is there anywhere I can download it of the internet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by REN (talk • contribs)

emule, dvd rip. but shh that's a secret. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.40.180.221 (talk • contribs)

Hi, you know even here in America this movie is hard to find... You should still try to see it, it's excellent. Someone uploaded it on Youtube (in 10 parts) if you're interested.

[edit] People buy into that Security Leak?

To pass it off as leaked security is total BS, but people actual fall for it even though the camera's date says 2001 and columbine happened in 1999.

Thats to inform people that this is a movie, and Just a movie. Although it parodies the events of columbine, It wasent trying to show any real life person being shot at in columbine.

[edit] = lenght of the shooting

in the 'goofs' section it says that they were in the car at 8:30 and inside the school at 10:00 and it was a goof, and the article also says that the shooting was just 16 minutes long (10:00 - 10:16).

well, i really thought that just last 16 minutes were caught on tape, but the shooting had had been running through the time elapsed since they left the car, and that's why we see no bombs or anything at the recorded footage, they've already used, so the massacre ran rom 8:30 to 10:16.

doesn't it make sense?