User talk:Zephyrad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|---|
| 1 |
[edit] The Beatles
 |
Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to [join us]. |
| Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!
Todo:
|
|
--kingboyk 21:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You are right
Thank you for your comments, Zephyrad. This is my first debate at Wikipedia and, frankly, I am surprised by the mob rule and closed-mindedness! I see you are a writer—it does appear those who have to write or edit for a living believe in the lowercase definite article and the uneducated do not, if I were forced to make a generalization. I love your oil analogy. Similarly, though it is not as good an analogy, remember the spam-free internet, before the mob got in?—Jack Yan 23:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Zephyrad, thanks for popping by and leaving a comment on my talk page. I got pretty frustrated with the whole thing and only came in today after spotting something on Wiki that was incorrect. Mark was rather negative in his comment below to you, wasn't he? He seemed to think I was rude. Oh well, people will read in whatever they like. Still gets me that the capitalization brigade never had the sense just to Google some newspapers!—Jack Yan 12:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Maintenance tags
The thing with some maintenance tags (in films at least) goes like this: some editors go through a huge number of articles looking for what may be missing (or going wrong) and tagging them for it. When a maintenance tag is added, the article appears in a certain maintenance category (like Category:Articles that need a film infobox). Then a number of members organize a campain for cleaning the category by adding the missing item or doing whatever task is needed (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Films#Infoboxes). Of course some tasks have a huge backlog... I hope this gives you an idea. Cheers! Hoverfish Talk 08:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry to leave it unclear. It's about you expressed wish (which I also often share) in Talk:Blue Denim. Hoverfish Talk 09:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] It is now the Beatles
In case you are not watching the page, I have now formalised the policy to reflect the proper way of refering to the band. The announcement is here, and the wording is on the main page. Your help in applying this policy to the articles would be appreciated. LessHeard vanU 15:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am delivering the above message to all the concerned editors. I have noted your comments on talkpages. Please do not bother thanking me for my efforts, although I seriously doubt such a consideration would ever have entered your mind, as I wish to interact with you as little as possible. LessHeard vanU 15:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Hamilton Stands (deletion review)
Hi, yes, it looks like you've submitted it correctly. (There were very few real problems, but some trolls have blown it out of proportion, but this is how Wikipedia works).--Konstable 11:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Wish I could see the original article. But yeah--sometimes you just have to work through the regulations enforced by those who spend a lot of time here. --Lukobe 20:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Glad to help. --Lukobe 16:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:PeteBest1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PeteBest1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Paul Beaver ("addition lacks references"?!)
I got tired of writing something similar to "removing infantile vandalism" as an explanation for the revert and got a little more "creative" on this and a similar entry on the 1970s article because the vandal came up with a more "unique" edit than just simply adding "poop" somewhere in an article! Just trying to make it different today! CZmarlin 05:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apple Boutique
That's not punctuation, it's magic! :) --kingboyk 23:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC) (nice edit)
[edit] Ascot Sound Studios
Hi. I don't know if you saw my reply or not, but the bottom line is that if you disagree with an edit of mine feel free to revert it, or open it up to further discussion :) (Bold, revert, discuss). Cheers. --kingboyk 21:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I Apologize
I feel so embarrassed for everytime I inserted the album cover I did not notice the difference. I appreciate the heads up and yes I strongly understand the vandalism polocies which makes me feel worse. Thank you for the good Wiki work. --Apologies2all 13:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Raider Snowmobile
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Raider Snowmobile, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 17:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] John S. Park Elementary School
Hi Zephyrad. I've replied on your comment at the talk page of 12.32.94.66. - Face 20:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kleinsigning.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kleinsigning.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Remo Four
Hi Zephyrad, just a quick "hello" and thank you for the (very quick) formatting of the discography I added last night. I'll try to get dates, etc for the band's original releases. Best wishes, Weydonian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weydonian (talk • contribs) 17:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Monkee
A tag has been placed on Monkee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 14:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: RE: The Beatles: An Illustrated Record
I tag articles accordingly, regardless of whether it is in the writing process. If you feel that you have good sources, you can remove the tag. Other than general items, specific things I think require a reference:
- "The Beatles: An Illustrated Record is a 1975 book by music journalists Roy Carr and Tony Tyler, published by Harmony Books. Updated editions were published in 1978 and 1981."
- The first sentence is introductory (obviously), but has no reference as to prove its authors and updated version publications.
- "Later editions deleted this portion, stating only that they were of generally poor sound quality, and of interest 'only to the most die-hard Beatlemaniacs.'"
- Direct quote, needs reference.
Thanks. <3 bunny 00:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- "Some of us simply know things, without having the appropriate references right there handy" constitutes WP:OR, which is not appropriate. As for what types of reference, anything that satisfies WP:RS would suffice. I'm not saying I don't believe you, I'm just saying you don't have reliable secondary sources to back it up. If someone is going to ask you "where did you find this information", "I just know it" wouldn't suffice as an answer. And you know, I'd expand the article, but I'm not particularly knowing of the subject, so I tag it, hoping others who have the knowledge - you, for example, might find the sources and cite them. I'm not trying to be provocative or offensive; I'm merely trying to say that this page lacks WP:RS and some should be added. <3 bunny 01:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Pleasant Valley Sunday, was selected for DYK!
 |
On February 27, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pleasant Valley Sunday, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid (talk) 17:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Second class citizenry
There is absolutely no doubt that people from the lower castes are discriminated against by various sections of the Indian society, but my point was that citizenship is granted by the state (state and Union governments) and in that respect people from the lower castes are equal, at least theoretically. Segregation and apartheid were state sanctioned, to my knowledge. In fact, there are well established affirmative action programs sponsored by the state in India, although their effectiveness is a matter of debate. Please see Reservation in India.
But make no mistake, millions of lower caste Hindus continue to face discrimination (along with minority religions and women) even as India's Chief Justice is from the lower caste and Prime Minister is a Sikh among other examples of egalitarianism. My textbooks in India did not mention much abt British involvement in the caste system. So, I really dont know much abt that. But the caste system was officially only abolished when the Constitution of India came into force, after British occupation had ended. Thanks.I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reply on my talk page
Hi Zephyrad. I left a detailed response on my talk page, mostly regarding how I interpreted the definite-article debate on "The Beatles" vs. "the Beatles". I don't have time to take care of the admin actions on the various page moves you pointed out, but if they still need attention later when I do have time, I'll see what I can do. Thanks. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 00:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Beatles moves
Thanks Let me say first off, that I have an aesthetic preference for "the Beatles," so I have not moved anything as a matter of trying to unilaterally impose my own preference. Secondly, I took a look at the link you gave - and I hope you can appreciate this - I do not know that I have the time or energy to read all of these posts. I looked for a final consensus and did not immediately see one. Are you trying to say that there is some official preference for "With the Beatles?" What again was the rationale for that? Is that not contrary to similar policy on Wikipedia? Thanks so much for your time. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Okay Well, I certainly won't be offended if anyone moves the pages - yourself included. That having been said, it seems like this indicates an arbitrary and inconsistent capitalization including resorting to capitalization used by "official" sources (e.g. the title card of "The Birth of the Beatles" has a lower-case "the" so that article should be lower case, whereas "A Day with The Beatles" uses caps, so it should be caps.) This is directly contradictory to Wikipedia:Trademarks which reads "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting 'official'" and follows with examples. Regardless of what is decided by a WikiProject, those rules supercede, do they not? Now, it is my understanding that normative English includes capitalization of "the" in Beatles since it is a proper name. Again, that's not my personal preference, but it's my understanding of how things are to be done. This is why I asked "Is that not contrary to similar policy on Wikipedia?" and I feel like I need to reiterate that question again.
- I realize that the discussion about capitalization was long, drawn-out, etc. before. I don't particularly care to get into the middle of it, since, to the best of my knowledge, it is irrelevant anyway. Either all "the"s should be capitalized or none of them should (barring obvious examples such as the beginning of a sentence.) Also, if there was not actual consensus reached (and it appears there wasn't from your response) I don't see how me reading all of it is in any way germane. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks Your last post really clarified your attitude, but it didn't exactly answer my questions. I appreciate your note and the good-will behind it. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] apologies
Regarding your comment on my talk page: it definitely looks like I made a mistake. I apologize; I'm usually more careful. Please forgive me.
Samboha (talk) 04:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] You removed a cited, published statement
You removed a statement published on the CD liner for Wonderwall Music. That was Derek Taylor, quoting George Harrison. You replaced it by an uncited statement which contradicts it. See the Wonderwall page discussion.
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 23:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Some good points you made, followed up on the Wonderwall Music Discussion. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 01:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
