User talk:Zencv
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
[edit] March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. You don't own Wiki to define what constitute Vandalism and what is not based on your needs, is it? I had only included reasoned arguments, if you have any objections, you can discuss about it in the talk page..Reverting quite a lot of revisions without giving any reason constitutes vandalism. Until that time, please consider using sandbox by yourself Zencv (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- When you add phrases such as "awards from right-wing groups" without citing a source for your claim, even after you've been asked to cite and still do it, then yeah it's vandalism. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
This is your own definition..Also see hypocrisy
- Also see WP:3RR and WP:SOCK. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I have..What makes you think that I am a Sock? If you have any arguments against what I wrote, you can bring them in talk page instead of looking into my identity. If you think I am a SOCK, either you can live with that or you can consider complaining to admin. Let him decide.
[edit] Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Islamic Golden Age has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Nope - there is a detailed explanation in talk page. Mea Culpa for being 2 minutes late to commit talk page changes Suigeneris (talk) 15:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Question
Are you the same person as User:Leaveout? Kelly hi! 21:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, I am not. You are intelligent and seems to have an IQ of 198. Suigeneris (talk) 21:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi,,,m sorry to bother u ...but i got ur message sayin that u reverted my last edit to Kozikode..... but to be honest i didnt find the total point of the paragraph...whereas population of muslims have been mentioned as a whole,,,there is no need to mention population of Dawoodi bohras separately,,,as such statements lead to impressions that Dawoodi bohras are different from rest of the muslims;. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridwan Gazi (talk • contribs) 22:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Greeting brother,,, thanks a lot for ur reply,,,but I would like to tel you that we muslims among themselves as different from each other be it Sunni or Shia..each belong to the fold of Islam,,and muslims all over the world hav only one cuture that to follow ISlam..and as such there shudnt be any differenciation between its followers...there isnt any diffrence between a Dawoodi mosque and any other mosque.
So i hereby request u to kindly refrain ur self from such things.
Regards
Mr.Gazi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridwan Gazi (talk • contribs) 09:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Diversity is a fact for all world religions, including Islam - accept it or not. But I will consider your point also and will think of restructuring the sentence. Anyway, People and Religion section of Kozhikode need some rewriting. Suigeneris (talk) 09:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)