Talk:Zenon Panoussis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zenon Panoussis article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages.
This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology.
The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics.
See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Tagging

Tagged for no citations, no WP:RS, only WP:OR. This article has been typed off Wikipedia and a copy/paste job done five years ago without anyone adding anything verifiable about it. COFS 01:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

It's described at http://www.xenu.net/archive/events/zenon/ Other links exists[1][2][3][4]. The case was high profile so there was many newspaper articles written about him. // Liftarn
Thanks. But you have not put in ONE of them. So I re-tagged it to invite some more people to do something about it. WP:ATTRIB says "Original research refers to material that is not attributable to a reliable, published source. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, ideas, statements, and neologisms; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that appears to advance a position. Material added to articles must be directly and explicitly supported by the cited sources." and "Note the difference between unsourced material and original research: Unsourced material is material not yet attributed to a reliable source. It is unattributed. Original research is material that cannot be attributed to a reliable source. It is unattributable. The only way to demonstrate that material is not original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and to adhere to what those sources say". This article is 100% Original Research or Unattributed Material, I wouldn't know as there are 0% sources in the article. COFS 21:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I saw you did a lot of drive by tagging. // Liftarn