User talk:Zelogan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on Kucinich.us, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Southern Texas 19:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I deleted Kucinich.us because I believed that it was covered by CSD A7. The election is significant: that doesn't make every website related to it significant. Regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oddly enough, it seems that I didn't delete it, although I certainly intended to. It has been changed to be a redirect to Dennis Kucinich. You could discuss this at Talk:Dennis Kucinich. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- My apologies, I did indeed delete Www.kucinich.us. I checked the wrong page. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] August 2007
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Www.kucinich.us. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Evil1987 14:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Www.kucinich.us
A tag has been placed on Www.kucinich.us, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Www.kucinich.us. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Evil1987 16:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Relisted
I have relisted Www.kucinich.us for speedy deletion. Especially given that it has already been deleted once, I think this article qualifies under numerous guidelines.
A tag has been placed on Www.kucinich.us, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
JasonCNJ 21:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please stop spamming
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. PubliusFL 22:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.kucinich.us
As you've recreated the article on Kucinich's website, I've opened a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.kucinich.us. Please do comment there. Regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please discuss AfD in the proper place
Hi. I noticed you recently contributed to Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Www.kucinich.us. The proper place to note comments and register discussion regarding articles up for deletion is on the relevant project page, not the talk page. That would here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Www.kucinich.us, rather than the earlier link. There's no guarantee that everyone will look at the talk page, so if you comment there, it's possible your contributions will be overlooked. ==bfigura (talk) 14:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reposting for Speedy Deletion
A tag has been placed on Kucinich.us, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Kucinich.us is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Kucinich.us saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. JasonCNJ 20:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kucinich.us
Hello. I've deleted again. After we have a discussion, like the one at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.kucinich.us, recreated articles which are similar will normally be speedily deleted. Please don't recreate the article unless you can show that Kucinich's website has been the subject of books or magazine/newspaper articles. If you have any questions, please let me know. Best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kucinich campaign site
Please read this message carefully. You will not receive another warning. Kucinich campaign site has been deleted. Do not recreate this article under this or any other name. Should you do so, you will be blocked from editing. If you wish to appeal the deletion, the appropriate forum is Wikipedia:Deletion review. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppetry case
 |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Zelogan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. JasonCNJ 00:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
When Angusmclellan warned you not to create the campaign website article again, what that meant was "don't do it again", not "make a different account before you do it again". You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for recreation of inappropriate articles using an abusive sockpuppet. If you wish to request review of this decision, you may place {{unblock|reason here}} on this page. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
