User talk:Zekka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear Edit Caretakers of this site:

We are not blatent, as you infer. We are the persons who you have pages, several I might add, incuded into your site, and we find the content, as not representative of the true facts about ourselves. visit www.zekenlightkindgom.com and become enlightened about who you are addressing, we invite you.

We have used your site, ourselves, and have found it very informative, but when it came checking what was written about ourselves, we were very disappointed at how untrue the representation was, and not in line with our experience with your site. We set our team to work to solve this issue, and have edited, to date, as much as they had time for, only to find that someone was reverting our true statements about ourselves, back to the untrue ones you had previous. We only ask that you respect our information as you have respected so many others that we have referenced using your site. Please put our edits back in place, and we much appreciate, that you watch so closely, as we know you will make sure that they remain.

Thank you. Zeriiya Zekkariyas (formerly Linda Womack).

Unfortunately, your edits are not permittable here. Wikipedia upholds a staunch neutral point of view policy, and the content that you are inserting is directly against this. If you can re-format your text so that it does not contain an inherent bias, you may re-instate it. However, editing articles about yourself is frowned upon here, as it constitutes a conflict of interest, so your edits will be held to a much higher standard than others. If you fail to meet these standards, your edits will be reverted, and you may be blocked from editing. Please look over the policies that I've linked to, as well as our reliable source policy. Thank you. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 11:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] EQ-EJYPTSIAN QUEEN

A tag has been placed on EQ-EJYPTSIAN QUEEN requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 09:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zekkariyas

A tag has been placed on Zekkariyas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 10:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Okay, listen, the pages that you've been creating are getting deleted as blatant spam; you need to stop inserting links and redirects into other articles. They will be reversed, and you may be blocked. Please stop. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 10:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Linda Womack, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 11:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CAPITALS

For goodness' sake, please learn to use your Caps Lock key. It's not necessary to write everything in capital letters. -- ChrisO 13:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Legal Threats

Your recent edits could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. Smashville 04:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)