User talk:Zdravko mk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Zdravko mk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Deckiller 13:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Praxis

Hi Zdravko...Just wanted to say that I am very pleased witht he way that the Praxis school articles are developing and to thank you for collaborating with me on this project. If you know anybody else who would be interested in colaborating, please get them involved. Cheers and look forward to continuing to develop this area of Wikipedia with you. Pozdrav, --Bora Nesic 04:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

With regards to the See Also section, I agree, we should delete it. I have located the entire collection of Praxis journals at the U of T library, but due to the intense schedule with midterms haven't been able to turn any of the stuff into a soft copy. Will let you know as soon as I can do so.--Bora Nesic 13:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I've been missing from any major action on wikipedia for a while as it's exam time, but my thinking is that the next thing that the Praxis School article is a good summary of criticism leveled against the Praxis philosophers, in particular those that did not come from the Government, but from more liberally oriented thinkers. I think that a good start to this end is the NIN article you found about Praxis group where a few philosophers including Mile Savic (a Heidegger scholar from Belgrade) wage an attack on Praxis school as Leninism in disguise. Unfortunately I probably won't get to this until the third week of March, but I thought I'd share some creative input as you are fairly active on these pages.--Bora Nesic 14:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Grlic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grlic.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

You are in danger in violating Wikipedia:3RR on Nikola Karev. You might be temporarily blocked from further editing.   /FunkyFly.talk_   16:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

You are also in danger in violating Wikipedia:3RR on Lazar Kolisevski. You might be temporarily blocked from further editing.   /FunkyFly.talk_   16:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on June 2, 2006 (UTC) to Lazar Koliševski

 You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 22:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Re your mail... I don't think FF has broken 3RR William M. Connolley 07:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Re your other mail... its better to talk here. And no, I'm not going to get involved in the content William M. Connolley 17:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Regarding reversions[2] made on June 5, 2006 (UTC) to Nikola Karev

 You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 13:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Re your mail (btw, did you know you can edit this page when blocked?): its fairly simple, for 3RR: you get blocked for breaking it and not-blocked for not breaking it William M. Connolley 15:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

FunkyFly has also broken the rule and you haven't blocked him. Please, you don't need to explain me anymore. I have told you what is the situation. If you think that it is enough to block someone without seeing his edits and the discussion page, than it is beyond my reach. Probably being an administrator means some responsibility to do that, but, yes, you can block everybody whom you are formally told that has broken the 3RR rule, no matter if he, and not the other side, was trying to be constructive and to find a compromise. It's OK, Mr. Connolley, side with the stronger and don't give a demn about the quality of the Wikipedia (Zdravko mk 16:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC))

I've told you: if you think FF has broken 3RR, report him. Since you can't at the moment, list them here William M. Connolley 16:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The real problem is not blocking someone. There is a need for outside help for the article Nikola Karev, and please see the edits. There can you see that I am trying to be constructive and the other side is not doing that. They are working in a coalition against me to go around the 3RR rule. But OK, if you think it is appropriate, I report FunkyFly for breaking the 3RR rule on Nikola Karev. After the possible sanction, he and his fellows will come back and will insist on their, I must say nationalist, version. It is not appropriate solution of the problem. (Zdravko mk 07:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC))

Indeed no: simply 3R/day on each side is no solution. See-also WP:DR William M. Connolley 08:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Left-wing politics. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CynicalMe 07:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help with translation

I'm currently working on a script intended to create short articles on political parties on a variety of wikipedias simultaneously. However, in order for the technique to work I need help with translations to various languages. If you know any of the languages listed at User:Soman/Lang-Help, then please help by filling in the blanks. For example I need help with Macedonian. Thanks, --Soman 15:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)