User talk:Zapp645

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a place for messages. Maybe leave one for me? - Stephen Goldmeier | Profile | Talk | (._.) | 08:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

this is way better [nerdier] than Facebook! Xwoodandwater 19:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Jar of Fools

Thanks for getting back to me. In a nutshell, Wikipedia defines notability as "A topic is notable if it has been the subject of at least one substantial or multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject and of each other." In this case, it might include reviews from major magazines or newspapers, or having the strip reproduced ion the same.

I encourage you to review the notability guidelines at Wikipedia:notability. There may be more there that is of assistance to you. Good luck, and let me know when you have revised your article so I can take a look at it. Dennitalk 18:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

  • The changes you have made do indeed establish notability. Nice work on getting those in. AFAIC, this article is solid. Dennitalk 05:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Clouds Above

Well spotted. What happened was I as editing the categories, spotted the Amazon links which I removed (following WP:EL) and didn't want to leave the section empty so I tagged it. As you say it has a number of good references so there is no real need for the empty section so I've removed it. If anything pops up that suitable for the external section someone can restart the section. Cheers. (Emperor 14:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Need help with comics page

I have ticked someone off. Need help with restoring page on comic artist Ashley Wood. Editor has pegged me as being non-neutral source (which is fine) but now he's deleting things and adding banners. Could you please take look? Bambaland 03:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)bambalandBambaland 03:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cityofglass.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cityofglass.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)