Talk:Zaolzie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Zaolzie has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
December 27, 2006 Good article nominee Listed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the Czech Republic. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

	Poland Portal Zaolzie is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Poland on Wikipedia. To participate simply edit the article or see our current projects and discussions. On the main project page we have some tools to help you out. Don't hesitate to ask questions!
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

[edit] Initialy part of ...

Dear Darwinek, you too use old references (eg.Elizabeth Lucretia, Duchess of Teschen and "Těšínsko tvořilo původně součást území kmene Holasoviců a patřilo s ním do Moravy" (Tesin initially was part of region of Holasic tribe and with it was part of Moravia) is what I say. In article itself is Zaolzie defined as part of Tesin. Yopie 15:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

BTW, in archived talk page I cannot found anything about consensus about old sources. Yopie 15:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yopie (talk • contribs)

Could you guys expand on this - initially a part of Poland - since when, exactly? The 9th-10th century Moravian ref ([1]) - how reliable is it? Can we find better, more reliable refs in English for those claims? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

• To Yopie: We've reached that consensus with Xixaxu and Piotrus and I recommend you to join us, friend. It is really better for mutual good, it avoids nationalist and often non-precise old information from both sides. Remember that both sides fabricated (překrucovali, přibarvovali) facts.
• To both: No rush, no worries. There were written hundreds books about Cieszyn Silesia, Czech and Polish. Some historical magazines about this region still appears in both languages. It is really no problem to find any information. I don't think it should be in English, as literature in this language is scarce. I believe Yopie or me will find that info sooner or later. No worries.

--Darwinek (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)