Talk:Zantigo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
known to have that strange architectural detail which has been preserved by Taco Bell.
The above quoted text sounds strange to me, and should be clarified... --Rehcsif 20:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Original Items on the Menu
I think it is important to point out that the current menu contains many of the original items. The Chilitos and Chips and Cheese taste exactly the same way today as they did 25 years ago! It doesn't make sense to refer to the Chilito in past-tense, as though it no longer exists. You can get a Chilito in any Minnesota Zantigo today, and you won't be able to tell the difference from the "originals".
--jamie74 16:37, 12 Sept 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unrelated to the Original
I don't think the statement "apparently unrelated to the original" is worded in the best way:
A new Zantigo chain, apparently unrelated to the original, was started in Minnesota in 1999 and currently has seven locations (six in Minnesota and one in Wisconsin).
How can a restaurant with the same name, and much of the original menu items, be "unrelated" to the original? From a business sense, if there is a different owner, then you can make the argument that they're unrelated. But if the new establishment incorporates the original concepts and menu items, I think it makes it misleading at that point to say they are "unrelated". I went to Zantigo when I was a child, and I go now. There little difference between the two in aesthetics as well as menu items. It has the same feel as the original chain. Given that, perhaps it would make more sense to rephrase:
The re-established chain, apparently under new ownership, was started in Minnesota in 1999 and currently has seven locations (six in Minnesota and one in Wisconsin).
--jamie74 17:21, 12 Sept 2006 (UTC)