User talk:Z1xcvbn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What I look like when I'm faced with vandals
What I look like when I'm faced with vandals

Welcome!

Hello Z1xcvbn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --PHenry 02:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] It is

It is considered ok to remove your own comments but it's not ok to restore other people's comments. If you do something like that again, you will be blocked. Thanks. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 05:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I've reverted your last edit, which was, clear and simple, an attack. If you want to post here, be civil. Blackcap (talk) 05:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Actually, now that I look at the history, you beat me to it. But this is unacceptable. Blackcap (talk) 05:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

You cannot go around calling people assholes or attacking Woohoo. This is unacceptable. Guettarda 05:08, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

  • I thought personal attacks were welcome, as long as you revert them yourself, and I thought restoring/mentioning them was grounds for an indef block? could our junior miss admin have missinformed me?--I have arrived just in time 05:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Anyone that can construe what I said to you as a "personal attack" doesn't belong here. All I literally said was "Personal attacks? On whom? And I am not a new admin". That was it. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 05:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
      • I can only hope that there are sane users out there who will deal with all the lose canons out there, or else we're doomed to a sea of petty, blockahaulic, trolls like Miss Kitty here--I have arrived just in time 05:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for continuing personal attacks despite warnings. Please refrain from personal attacks when your block expires. Guettarda 05:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Turning your talk page into a chat room? I'm telling you that you were going against the wishes of people on the O'Reilly Talk page by re-tagging the article for POV issues without citing them. And yes, it's strange that Fluterst leaves a discussion/revert war, and then you immediately come in and pick up where they left off, but I'm sorry I accused you of using sockpuppets. More evidence would be required for an accusation like that. --relaxathon 05:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I doubt it, doesn't take much to get blocked around here--I am the one, the only, Z1xcvbn 06:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
If you hadn't created multiple sockpuppets, you might've been ok. But then you proved that you were just a vandal and that was that. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 07:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)