User talk:Yukichigai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

May 22, 2006 - January 2, 2008

One day, when we're married —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.81.80.153 (talk) 05:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Contents 1 Centralized TV Episode Discussion 2 Edit summary 3 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2 4 Civility 5 Invitation 6 Welcome, thanks for joining 7 WikiProject Life on Mars Newsletter 8 Mass Effect 9 peer review 10 Red Dwarf peer review 11 Ashes to Ashes 12 WP:LOM Newsletter 13 WikiProject Life on Mars - April 2008 Newsletter 14 Race and Crime

[edit] Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 23:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll get to it once I have time to read up on the existing discussion. I have much to say, but I don't want to say something that's already said, nor do I want to ignore existing points which have been brought up. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 11:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary

Regarding this summary: Who is the "you" whom you're addressing? --Kife 10:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Johntex. Thus far he appears to be the only person who has raised any serious concerns (that is to say, concerns not relating to minor issues like specific wording) over the inclusion of the new section as it was at the most recent version. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 10:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough, I just had a moment of paranoia. Cheers. --Kife 10:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Edit summaries such as this are unacceptable in any context; please don't repeat such behavior. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 22:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm calling a spade a spade. If you look over Clockback's contributions to the article for the past week or so you'll likely also arrive at the conclusion that he's being a twat. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 23:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you are unaware that, though calling someone a "twat" might be acceptable in some contexts, it's considered extremely vulgar in most others. I fail to see how edits turn someone into a vagina. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 23:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It's British slang, and the user is British, and it's roughly the equivalent of calling someone a dick here in the states. As far as why it turns someone into a vagina... ask the Brits. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 23:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It's incivil. Desist. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 00:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I was going to make the same warning, I see that jpgordon beat me to it. When we call a spade a spade, we are calling a spade a spade. Not a potato a spade. Clockback is not a "twat," which is literally incorrect, or, alternatively, is at best a vulgar and uncivil term for someone being rude. He made a clumsy edit, I suspect he didn't realize that it would appear as it did, and he is being contentious and, indeed, disruptive in violation of WP:POINT, but we don't need to toss gasoline on the fire. I have warned him, as I am warning you. You could be blocked for that comment, users have been blocked for less. --Abd (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation

Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 17:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome, thanks for joining

Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 16:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Life on Mars Newsletter

The Life on Mars Wikiproject Newsletter Issue 2 - February 2008

"They reckon you've got concussion - I couldn't give a tart's furry cup if half your brains are falling out. Don't ever waltz into my kingdom acting king of the jungle." - Gene Hunt Project news Ashes to Ashes begins airing on BBC One and BBC Four this month: the project's volunteers could help out with all of these articles as well. Unfortunately there is no change in the volume of good articles in the project. A list of Life on Mars and Ashes to Ashes has been created and Alex Drake's article has been made. To do Character profiles, such as Gene Hunt, Sam Tyler, Annie Cartwright and Phyllis Dobbs are close to good article status, with a bit of work, we can do it. Lesser known characters but still of importance, like DC Chris Skelton and DS Ray Carling still need expanding or creating. Everything Ashes to Ashes should be worked on.

New members Llamafish, Gingerclan, Gogorox93, Kaid100, Onshore, Yukichigai and Jamesgibbon joined in January. Theelf29 has left the project.

Newsletter delivered by _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} on 20:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC) using AWB. Complaints or issues should be brought to him.

[edit] Mass Effect

"A bit long". Sure, keep that page languishing in mediocrity - that page is never going anywhere. By your logic, undue weight does not exist, trivial relevance does not exist, and trivial notability does not exist. See you around. Chensiyuan (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] peer review

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 22:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Red Dwarf peer review

Hi there. The Red Dwarf article has just been requested for a Peer Review. I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over and give us an honest peer review. The article has gone through major changes in the last few months, and it would be great if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could give some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. If you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thanks. Wikipedia:Peer review/Red Dwarf --Nreive (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ashes to Ashes

Hello

For your information Ashes to Ashes the Spin-off of Life on Mars is airing Thursday 7th February. Don’t miss out it should be good!

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 16:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:LOM Newsletter

The Life on Mars Wikiproject Newsletter Issue 3 - March 2008

"Take that seatbelt off. You're a police officer, not a bloody vicar." - Gene Hunt Project news Still no change in the volume of good articles in the project; Come on, we can do it! Many revert wars have occurred. Please keep an eye on DC Chris Skelton for pathetic arbitrary word vandalism and John Simm for potential edit wars. A new section has been posted to the project page for potential sources for articles, and another for image tips. To do Major sourcing, image adding and other housekeeping tasks. Everything Ashes to Ashes should be worked on.

New members Dave Dubya, JordanAshley, Freddie R. Aldous, A bright cold day in April, Exxolon and Shealer joined in February. Welcome, all! Farewell to Tony Sidaway who left the project. Good luck in the future.

Newsletter delievered by WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN ^{aka john lennon} on 11:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC) using AWB

[edit] WikiProject Life on Mars - April 2008 Newsletter

The Life on Mars Wikiproject Newsletter Issue 4 - April 2008

"Bloody hell, they have better dialogue on Dynasty!" - Ray Carling Project news The rules and policies about copyrighted images have been listed on the main WikiProject page, in case you were ever unsure. To do Character profiles, such as Gene Hunt, Sam Tyler, Annie Cartwright and Phyllis Dobbs need heavy inline citations. Lesser known characters but still of importance, like DC Chris Skelton and DS Ray Carling, still need expanding.

New members Just one new member this month; a warm welcome to 3fingeredPete.

Newsletter delievered by weburiedoursecretsinthegarden at 21:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC). Direct any questions or comments to him.

[edit] Race and Crime

Hey there! I was just wondering why you removed materials such as this; I dislike the studies too, but if academic institutions have studied the pattern of interracial crime then there's no reason not to include it. At least, that's my opinion; others may think differently. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 05:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I see where you're going; I'll leave it to you guys to decide whether it's fair to be included on the talk page (after all, you're right, the study is a bit too small to be effectively compared to others). Also, another user has brought up a concern of an indef-blocked user on that page. If you find anything out, please let me know so that I can take further action. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 05:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)