Talk:Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Conflicting Info on Japanese Name.
Some sources are saying that it's "Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters 5D's", while others (such as Moon Phase) say it's "Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's" (you'll have scroll down a bit to see it). I am requesting that nobody add any Japanese name/spelling to the article until some kind of consensus is made. (Brittany Ka )
- I would say that an official site is a BETTER source than Moonphase. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RUN-ONS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION
THE PAGE HAS RUN-ONS SENTENCES WHICH IS INCORRECT GRAMMAR, THE SENTENCE ALSO HAS INFORMATION THAT IS ALREADY DESCRIBED IN THE Editing of anime in American distribution PAGE. ALSO THE PAGE ALSO STATES THAT UNCUT DVDS WILL BE ILLEGAL IN THE UNITED STATES, THAT SENTENCE IS UNSOURCED AND FALSE. SO THAT SENTENCE NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. I THINK THIS DISCUSSION IS STUPID TO ACTUALLY DISCUSS. THE TWO PROBLEMS ON THE PAGE ARE: 1) A RUN-ON SENTENCE AND 2) FALSE AND INCORRECT INFORMATION, LIKE WHY WOULD THE US MAE UNCUT-BILINGUAL DVDS ILLEGAL? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.208.73.158 (talk) 18:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- WHY ARE YOU TYPING IN ALL CAPS.
That sentence isn't a run-on, it just lists very many things. If you look closely you will see the grammar is fine.—Loveはドコ? (talk • contribs) 06:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nihon Ad Systems
I would like to state for the record that Nihon Ad Systems is not an animation studio. Studio Gallop animated the previous two shows, and this one is probably going to be their work as well. However, I am going to wait for confirmation before I add it. In any case, I just want to inform all of you ahead of time that I eventually plan to change the "Studio" listing because again, NAS is not an animation studio. Brittany Ka (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 4Kids
4Kids is going to crapitize the series as thay did with regulare Yugio. We have to mention this and put a Critism section. – 「JUMPGURU」@Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 19:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- That would be way to soon to have a criticism section. First criticism sections are discouraged because they are often a magnet for trooling etc. In most casees intergration into other sections is prefered. Secondly, criticising something that we think will happen in the future is a violation of WP:crystal --76.66.184.231 (talk) 03:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, and it has to be referenced. We have nothing right now. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)