User talk:Yozzer66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Also see: User:Yozzer66/User talk:Yozzer66/archive1

Contents

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yachts.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yachts.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

  • I have now provided a new rationale which I hope will be adequate. Yozzer66 (talk) 22:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Streets (punk album). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Spylab (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Made an official request for a comment on the substance of the edit war. Yozzer66 (talk) 21:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Phoenix Film.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Phoenix Film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:It's Immaterial.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:It's Immaterial.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Infoboxes

Please see Template:Infobox Musical artist, specifically "Current_members: This field is only relevant for groups. Current members of the group, listed in order of joining with no other notation than names." and "Past_members: This field is only relevant for groups. Past members of the group, listed in order of joining with no other notation than names. If a group is inactive, all members should be listed here, and none in the "Current_members" field."

There is definitely a place for extended discussion, but the infobox is not it. --John (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Garswood

Teams playing at Step 7 (i.e. the Cheshire Association Football League) or below are not considered notable unless they have played at a higher level or in the FA Cup/Vase in the past. The only team in the Cheshire League that has an article is Middlewich Town F.C., which has played in the Vase and Cup in one of its former incarnations. The others are all just reserve teams of clubs playing higher up the pyramid. Regards, пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, my mistake. I've restored the article. Regards, пﮟოьεԻ 57 22:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

[edit] WikiProject Merseyside

Hi there, I hope this isn't considered spam, but I noticed on the UK Geography project page that you have an interest in Merseyside related pages, so I wanted to ask if you would be interesting in supporting a Merseyside Wikiproject? I'm trying to gauge if there is suitable support before making a formal proposal. Cheers. Zenichiro (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Yes, I'd be very interested. I noticed that a Greater Manchester Wikiproject made a significant contribution to those pages. Good idea. Look overdue really. Yozzer66 (talk) 10:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter