Talk:Youth for Human Rights U.K.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Youth for Human Rights U.K. article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages.

	Scientology Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

To the Admin considering speedy delete:

These articles are part of a very polarized subject. It is clear they are stubs and they will most likely be merged into the main YHRI article.

I agree that there is very little in these articles, but there is also no reason which speedy delete must be applied. Using speedy delete, even if the article might technically qualify, will only increase tension between the two CoS and anti-CoS factions.

In the interest of lowering the conflict, I respectfully request that the articles be left for a few days until they can be merged in and properly deleted by concensus.

Thank you. Lsi john 13:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Unlike the Australia article, this one doesn't seem to have any specific information not found in the main one, so a speedy deletion wouldn't mean any loss. --Tilman 15:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Yet it would serve to increase tension with the other editors who tend to edit on the other side of the isle from you. Speedy delete would not serve an overall good purpose, in my opinion. This article will be merged or deleted shortly by consensus anyway. Speedy is unnecessary. Lsi john 15:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Removed tag on this and Canada article pending results of merge discussion, which should be allowed to conclude per above. If the result is merge, the deletion issue will be moot anyway. Note I'm on neither side of the debate, just trying to clear CSD backlogs atm. Orderinchaos 18:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merged Please delete and redirect

Admin,

Per discussion, this article has been merged into Youth for Human Rights International Please delete and re-direct this article there.

Thanks, Lsi john 18:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)