Talk:Young Modern

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Young Modern has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
December 8, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Young Modern article.
Article policies
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
This article, or a portion of it, was copyedited by the League of Copyeditors in January 2007. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.


Contents

[edit] Tracklisting

What is the source of the tracklisting? --Mdhowe 03:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

==LAS Newsletter (Silverchairs official fan club)

They've updated on their official page as of today. I changed the 'tentative tracklisting' heading to 'confirmed tracklisting'. Shaybear♥

[edit] Tracks

I have added the new tracks they have played at their latest shows. Doo Doo 03:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Album title

What is the source of the album title? I can't find any info about it on Google. --Mdhowe 22:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


It could reflect the type of art on the cover of the album. Furthermore - it is mentioned that the artwork reflects the De Stijl movement, but I think it should be mentioned that it DIRECTLY imitates Piet Mondrian's work.

[edit] Producer

I'm confused by the wording that reads: "Mixing the album commences again in January 2007 when Silverchair's preferred producer is available after a well deserved Christmas break." Apart from the awful cliche about the "well-deserved" break, it's unclear just who the band's preferred producer is. Launay? Someone else? If it is Launay, does the Christmas break overcome all their musical differences? If not Launay, who? Thanks Grimhim 03:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

It's not Launay and I'm not sure who it is. With regards to him being a producer, he's still going to be on the album as a producer (in case people were wondering about that). That's why I've put him back on the infobox.
--lincalinca 03:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pro Reviews

This is the first time that i see this website listed in any album on wikipedia as a pro review source. That is a very brief, amateur and almost fanatic point of view. I believe it should be removed. (silvi)

David Botrill (Tool, King Crimson, He Dreams Awake) Did Editing On Young Modern & Diorama. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.99.176 (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Youngmodernltded.jpg

Image:Youngmodernltded.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ymcover.gif

Image:Ymcover.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] wrong tense

sounds like this was written before the album came out: " The album will feature various guest appearances from other Australian (and possibly international) musicians such as Luke Steele, Julian Hamilton and Paul Mac (who previously collaborated with Johns in The Dissociatives and enlisted both Joannou and Gillies for his solo album 3000 Feet High)." its like in future tense with that "will".124.183.66.45 08:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] asterisk on some tracks in track listing?

what does the asterisk mean next to three of the tracks in the track listing table?

Kayno 13:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PR

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks,  Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Assessment

This is my assessment of the (current revision) article. I only had to make on susbsequent change which was for the punctuation. And, below the assessment are some tips that will help the page even further.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Further anaylsis on findings:

  • The album image was correctly tagged, used appropriately and a fair-use rationale was applied. YesY
  • I can find no original research. YesY
  • Grammar, prose and spelling is excellent.YesY
  • Everything is reliably sourced and is verifiable. YesY
  • Everything is readable, and doesn't incorporate words that a beginning editor or reader wouldn't understand.YesY
  • It is yet another example of Dihydrogen Monoxide music dedication, and avoids POV-style content, something important for an GA nominee.YesY
  • The article is focused and addresses a broad range of information without going into unnecessary detail. YesY

I am therefore willing to pass this article. Well done to DHMO! — Rudget speak.work 13:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)