Talk:Yemelyan Pugachev
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Yemelyan Pugachev is part of the WikiProject Russian history, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Russian history. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the assessment scale. |
This seems a little to anti-Pugachev if you ask me. Could someone find some positive things about him?
Contents |
[edit] Pugachev | Pugachev's Rebellion
I propose moving most of the insurection part of the article to the main article, Pugachev's Rebellion, and having a referring link. Thoughts? David Fuchs 22:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Whaa?
My beef is that all the sources I have list him as born in 1726-1728. I'm going to change it. If anyone disagrees, post here. David 00:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Both Brittanica and hrono.ru give 1740/1742. abakharev 08:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Eh, I guess. Damned book! Alright, I need to change it on Pugachev's rebellion. David 23:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article?
So, anyone want to take a stab at it? I think it's well written, but possibly needs better citation. I'm not saying any of it is incorrect, because I don't know if it is, but, I think there could be better citation all around. I know the information is out there, it's just not my specialty.--Vidkun 14:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Date of Execution
10 January was the date in the OS calendar. It's clear from this, this and this that the relevant NS date is 21 January 1775. I'm making the correction in the article. -- JackofOz (talk) 07:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
