Talk:Yellowworld
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Forum Drama
It would be nice if forum drama didn't work its way onto wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.46.164.248 (talk • contribs)
- Well, as this is the internet, with varying points of view, negative/positive, what have you...there will always be 'drama.'
-
- Wikipedia is no different; especially as you sometimes have those who want claim ownership of articles, which usually adds to that drama, despite Wikipedia being open to anyone to edit. However, when two or more people can put aside that drama and at least come to a satistying conclusion (or compromise)at least it allows some to move on temporarily.--Joel Lindley 17:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Looks like somebody has a personal vendatta against this website. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I wonder who that may be.
- Nonetheless, I suggest there be a compromise or 'suggestions' on an edit to satisfy both parties (you and I). Of course, per Wikipedia policy, no personal attacks would (or should) be implemented while we come to a satisfying compromise.--Joel Lindley 22:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see any room for compromise - all you want to do is add a horribly POV statement in the article without any verification or sources whatsoever. That's very bad editing. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Pretty much the entire article is one POV. As for verification, that is the reason we put a wikipedia tag stating such areas in a certain article needs some sort of back-up information that the original editor, or another, can add in due time.--Joel Lindley 22:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've taken out the POV statements and added sources. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 23:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sir, I think we've came to a compromise...
- I've taken out the POV statements and added sources. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 23:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Pretty much the entire article is one POV. As for verification, that is the reason we put a wikipedia tag stating such areas in a certain article needs some sort of back-up information that the original editor, or another, can add in due time.--Joel Lindley 22:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see any room for compromise - all you want to do is add a horribly POV statement in the article without any verification or sources whatsoever. That's very bad editing. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- I agree with your changes.=)--Joel Lindley 02:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-