User talk:Yeditor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
'THE BRAHMINICAL RELIGION EXPOSED'
== LORD RAMA
RAMA FOOLED BY SUKRIEVEN?
12 YEARS FOR RAMA, BUT 1 DAY FOR RAVAN!
MEAT - EATING RAMA
RAMA'S MANY WIFE
RAMA'S DISRESPECT FOR HIS FATHER
RAMA'S CONTEMPT FOR WOMEN & LOW CASTES
RAMA'S DEATH
LUSTFUL SITA V'S RAMA THE "IMPOTENT" GOD
WHAT LEADERS SAY ABOUT RAMA ?
LORD KRISHNA
THE RIDDLE OF RAMA & KRISHNA
GOD SHIVA, LORD GANESH & GODDESS PARVATHI
KALI, GODDESS OF VIOLENCE
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
GODDESS PANCHALI
ACHARYA RAJNEESH
CHANDRA SWAMI
SWAMI DIRENDRA BRAMACHARI (THE GODLY RAMBOU)
THE HARE RAMA HARE KRISHNA MOVEMENT
THE BRAHMIN CONSPIRACY
PURSHOTTAM RAO
THE CONTINUING WAR ON LOW CASTE HINDUS
SECTION IV ==
PORNOGRAPHY IN THE RAMAYANA
BRAHMINS AS BEEF EATER
LINGAM & YOUNI
DEVDASI (RELIGIOUS PROSTITUTION)
BARATA NATYAM & THE BRAHMINS
THE KAMASUTRA
THE DEVADASI SYSTEM THRIVES
THE NAKED HINDU YOGIS OF KASHI (BANARAS)
STARK NAKED BATS
THE MIRACLE MAN
HOW RISHIS WERE CREATED ?
SEX WITH COWS
RAMAYANA IS THE CULTURE OF ARYANS (BRAHMINS) !
THE HINDU RELIGION EXPOSED
Brahmins always criticize, condemn and mock at other religions Their criticism and mocking is unreasonable and unacceptable.
In his autobiography, Dr Charles , an American scholar says that it is very simple to define a Hindu. He says a Hindu means "one who believes in anything and everything if said in the name of god and shall never question its authenticity".
The Brahmins claim that Lord Rama is incarnated (came in human form) to study and understand the difficulties of mankind. Is it really necessary for a god to incarnate Himself?? CAn he not understand the creation? Why should God become a donkey or a cockroach in order to understand the sufferings of these creatures?
LORD RAMA
Lord Rama is the central character to the Epic RAMAYAN (whose author was Valmiki) Rama is the son of Dasharath, the king of Banaras. Dasharath had three wives, kaushalya, kaikeyi and Smitra besides several hundreds concubines.
According to the Ramayana, Rama spent most of his life trying to save his wife, Sita from the clutches of Ravan At the same time Rama was enjoying life to the full at every opportunity.
HOW RAMA WAS FOOLED BY SUKRIEVAN
When god Rama was exiled to the forest together with his wife, sukrievan appeared as deer and fooled god Rama. Although Rama was a "god", he was not able to see through Sukreivan's disguise!
12 YEARS FOR RAMA, BUT ONE DAY TO RAVAN
To retrieve his wife from Devil Ravan, god Rama sought the help of Hanuman, a monkey god. Hanuman agreed to help Rama bring his wife back on condition that god Rama in turn help him (Hanuman) to kill his twin brother prior to undertaking the mission.
I took more than twelve years for Hanuman to build a bridge and accomplish the task while Ravan just took Sita and flew to Sri lanka in just one day's time Where is the bridge that Rama built?? Who is more powerful - God Rama or Devil Ravan ? Would a god seek the help of another god to murder a third god?
- If Hanuman could fly carrying big mountains, he should have in the first instance carried and flown god Rama to Sri Lanka, which would have resulted in early rescue of Sita.
- Who knows what Ravan might have done to Sita during this period of twelve years? Definitely a devil would have done only "devilish" things!
Before helping god Rama, Hanuman made Rama shoot his own twin brother in the back and only then did Hanuman help god Rama How can a "god" indulge in such a criminal act for personal gain?
BEEF EATING RAMA
When God Rama was told to go to forest, he mournfully revealed to is mother: "if has been ordained that I have to lose the kingdom, forego the princely comforts and the tasty, MEAT DISHES. (Ayodha Kandam, 20, 26, 94th Chapters).
RAMA'S MANY WIVES
Mr. C.R. Sreenivasa lyengar's translation of Valmiki Ramayana says: " Though Rama had married Sita to be the queen, he married many other wives for sexual pleasure in accordance with the royal customs. (Ayodha Kandam 8th Chapter, page 28). (The term "Rama's wives" as been used in many places in Ramayan).
RAMA'S DISRESPECT FOR HIS FATHER
Rama called his father " A FOOL, AN IDIOT" (Ayodhya Kandam, 53rd Chapter).
RAMA'S CONTEMPT FOR WOMEN & LOW CASTES
Rama disfigured and mutilated many women by cutting off her noses, breasts, ears etc., and tortured them (Soorpanaki, Ayomuki).
Rama said, "Women should not be trusted" and that "Secrets should not be confided to the wife" (Ayodhya kandam, Chapter 100).
Sambuka was slain (by Rama) because he was making penance which was forbidden to hime by Vedas as he was a "Shudra" (Uttara kanadam, Chapter 76).
Looking at is hand Rama said the Sanskirt slogan "O right hand, you kill this Asche Shudra unhesitatingly as killing this Shudra is the only way to get back the life of the deceased Brahmin boy."
Are you not one of the limbs of Rama? (Valmiki Ramayana) Note: This Rama, who mercilessly took away the life of Sambuka for no other fault than that of making penance, is held as the Avatar (incarnation) of Vishnu (God)! If there were kings like Rama alive now, alas! what would be the plight of those who are called "Shudras?".
RAMA'S DEATH
Rama , like an ordinary man, fell down into the river and was DROWNED. (Uttara Kandam, Chapter 106). How can a "god die? Who will then look after the affairs of the world?
LUSTFUL SITA VS THE "IMPOTENT" RAMA
Sita told Rama "You are no better than a woman-monger who lets his wife for hire and makes is livelihood. You want to be profited by my prostitution". Sita also told Rama "You lack in POTENCE, manners and charm" & "She called her husband a simpleton".
As soon as Sita stepped into Ravan's palace her love towards Ravan grew more. (Aranya Kandam, Chapter 54).
When at length Rama asked Sita to swear about her chastity, she declined and died. (Uttara kandam, Chapter 97).
Kukuvavathy, sister-in-law of Rama, said to him - "Oh Elder! How you love Sita more than you love yourself! come with me and see what really is in your lovely wife's heart. Still she could not forget that fellow Ravan. Drawing a picture of Ravan on hand-fan and pressing it closed to her bosom She is lying on your bed with eyes closed thinking on and rejoicing at Ravan's glories. Rama sighed and went out to Sita's house. There she was found sleeping pressing to her breast the hand-fan on which Ravan's picture was drawn (This is found in pages 199, 200 of the Bengali Ramayana written by Mrs. Chandravathi).
If Rama loved Sita so much and Sita is held as an ideal Hindu wife, can Hindu women tolerate their husbands leaving them in forest for the years? Rama left Sita in forest after se became pregnant and she delivered er two kids in forest. (DR. B. R. Ambedkar : Riddles in Hinduism Maharashtra Govt. Publication, 1987).
WHAT LEADERS SAY ABOUT GOD RAMA?
"My Rama (god Rama) is not the Rama of Ramayana".
Mahatma Gandhi
"The Ramayana and Mahabaratha are nothing but another Arabian Nights Story".
Jawaharlal Nehru
"Rama is not a god; but he is a hero"
c Rajagopalachari, First Governor-General of India and a great Brahmin leader.
"Ramayan is not a divine story; it is only a literature" ( KALIYUGA KAMBAN,
T.K. CHIDAMBARANATHA MUDALIAR.
Babri Masjid was demolished by Rama Bhatkas claiming that it was his birth place.
LORD KRISHNA
Lord krishna was very fond of looking at naked young girls. Once upon a time Krishna, in order to get a full view of some bathing virgin girls, went to the extent of hiding their clothes on the tree top just to get a panoramic view. Does he have divine immunity from looking at naked women?
The Gita, a Holy book of the Hindus, quotes that when these bathing low caste girls begged for the return of their clothes, Lord Krishna demanded that they come out of the water with their hands raised instead of covering their bodies.
Oh my innocent Hindu brethren! Can this action be attributed to god? Os this God capable of indulging in such ungodly acts? Will Hindu mothers tolerate their son imitating god Krishna??
THE RIDDLE OF RAMA AND KRISHNA
The "Times of India" reported on 12-11-87 that the Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, had published a book called "The Riddles of Hinduism" by Dr. Ambedkar.
The report said that various statements contained in the book aroused the ire of some Brahmins, particularly the author's observation on Rama & Dasharth's many wives and also Krishna's moral character. (The Riddles of Rama and Krishna is available from Dalit Saithya Academy, Bangalore-3).
GOD SHIVA, LORD GANESH & GODDESS PARVATHI.
According to Hinduism, god Shiva's head is the source of the river Ganges and his head is also the place where the moon is located (if this was really a fact then why should America send astronaut Neil Armstrong 240,000 miles away to the moon)
According to Puranas, goddess Parvathi, wife of God Shiva, sought Shivas's permission to have a baby When Shiva refused, Paravathi took dirt from her body and created Lord Ganesh. (The late E.V.R. Preiyar used to call this god a "bundle fo dirt").
Later God Shiva mistakenly chopped off his own son's head. How could a god make such a foolish mistake? Would such a god solve your problems or make them more complicated?
To rectify his error God Shiva severed the head of baby elephant and transplanted in onto his son who then become known as the Elephant headed god. His statues are usually found near river-sides where he is said to be looking for a bride resembling his mother! (There is a different version to this story which, for decency's sake, cannot be printed here).
KALI GODESS OF VIOLENCE
A recent report by the press trust of India stated that during the past three years more than 2,500 young boys and girls were sacrificed to goddess kali in India An AFP's recent reports say: Hundreds of young boys and virgin girls are sacrificed every month for the deity Kali. In one case Rama Sewak hacked his eight year old son to death in broad daylight in Delhi becuase Godess Kali had told him he woudl come back to life and bring him good fortune. Bloot-thirsy kali is worshipped opnely in te length and breadth of India.
Kali's statue stands naked aside the inanimate body of the Hindu deity Siva, tongue stuck out with blood dripping from fang-like teeth. She holds a noose, a skull-topped staff, a blood-encrusted sword and a severed head. She is also known as Durga, Devi, Shaktima, Uma and Parvathi in manifestations.
The priest of Delhi, Kali Bari, says that a child sacrificed to Kali ensures a man the birth of a son. Human sacrifices are also made to these gods or goddesses, either to appease them or to ask favours of them.
Bihar's police chief J. Sahay said: "We have tried our best to curb human sacrifices, but what can an agency do when an entire village chooses a victim and cuts off his head with his parent's consent."
Bihar's famous lawyer, Urnkant Chaturvedi, said that "Human sacrifice under our law is treated as murder, but the killer- never found - is always the local high priest." He continues, "at times the local policemen are reluctant to take action because of the inbred fear of the gods and goddesses."
A famous human sacrifice occurred in 1972 when a powerful leader in Maharashtra state- in order to find a treasure - offered blood from I I virgin girls to Manja. He did not find the treasure, but four persons were hanged for the crime and the main culprit escaped because of his political influence.
Some time ago, two brothers named Siddharth and Ravi asked their 21 year old sister Shobha to take a bath and come for prayers to a nearby temple in Kerala State. To her horror, the brothers pierced her with a sword and iron rods chanting mantras. Withering in pain, she begged for pity, but she was cut to pieces and her body burned bit by bit. The brothers had done it to unearth a hidden treasure. At first they tried to find another victim but when they failed to find another virgin girl, they sacrificed their own sister. Only Brahmin children are exempted by the Vedas from human sacrifice.
GODDESS PANCHALI
This goddess was married to five brothers. Which one would become the legitimate father of his child should she have one? Dr Charles says that instances of incest are common in Hindu scriptures.
SHANKARACHARYA OF PURI - "HIS HOLINESS"!
SHANKARACHARYA OF PURI, NIRANJAN DEV TEERTH, BRAHMIN'S Spiritual leaders, gave an interview to the Kalyan (Hindu) monthly magazine. Extracts are given below:
Q: "Maharaj! if a Shudra acts righteously, can he become a Brahmin?"
A: "If the Shudra acts according to his code and keeps within the limit of Varnashrama he may become a Brahmin in the next birth - but never in the iresent."
Q: "Is the belief in the caste system essential?"
A: "Yes, it is very essential. There can be no PROGRESS without belief in caste system.
Q: "Maharaj! The change of caste depends on deeds and virtues."
A: "No, it depends on birth and not on deeds. Caste depends on birth, deeds cannot change it. This is an IRREFUTABLE TRUTH".
At the inaugurating of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (RSS Branch) at Patna in April 1969, the Shankaracharya said: "Untouchabitity is a part and parcel of Hindu social system, I shall cling to this belief even if they HANG ME. "
On Low Caste Hindus!
Have a look and see what the MANU says (Chapter VIII Sloka 4,14). "Slavery is inborn among the Shudras and no one can free them from it".
The Brahmin originated MANU again says in Chapter 19, Sloka 413: "Sri Brahmin had intended from eternity that the Untouchables should be born slaves, live as slaves, and die as slaves."
On another occasion the Acharya said that there was no way out for a woman who becomes a widow other than to commit Sati. He said he will oppose the Sati law even if the Government of India HANGS him. Instead of sending him to prison, according to the Indian constitution, this fanatic priest is often visited and worshipped by the top Brahmin leaders in India.
ACHARYA RAJNEESH
This is none other than the internationally famous "SEX SWAMIJI." He preaches free sex involving orgies and he says that before life comes to an end one should indulge in as much sexual activity as is humanly possible. This he claims is what blissful heavenly life is. He is a true swami, in that, he not only preaches but is also actively involved in practising what he preaches. He also teaches the love for wealth and materialism. Little wonder that this "god man" owns over ninety Rolls Royces and a ranch in America! Rajneesh and his "Holy" group are well known to carry all kinds of sexually transmitted diseases.
CHANDRA SWAMI
This controversial "globe trotting" godman has links with scandals like the Bofors scandal. He spends much of his time attending to the individual problems of Hollywood stars, multi-millionaires and other famous people. Should anything happen to them he rushes to their aid in a chartered private jet. He never misses an opportunity to pose for photographs with them so as to appear in international magazines like Time and Newsweek. Why doesn't he attend to some of Indian's problems as well? Pamella Bordes, the Ex-beauty queen of India, well known prostitute, was used by this Swamiji for some of his international frauds which have come to light very recently.
SWAMI DIRENDRA BRAMACHARI (THE GODLY RAMBOH)
Why does a "HOLY MAN" need a GUN FACTORY? This Swamiji has one! A gun with a licence to protect himself is justifiable ....... but this Swamiji needs a gun factory to protect himself? He also has had a helicopter pad constructed for his convenience. (His followers include Nani Palkiwala and Manoj Kumar).
The author has very high appreciation for the following HOLY MEN in preference to other HOLY MEN:
1. RAJNEESH - THE SEXY "HOLY" MAN.
2. MAHARISH - THE FLYING "HOLY" MAN.
3. CHANDRA SWAMI - THE HOLLYWOOD "HOLY" MAN.
4. SAI BABA - THE MAGIC "HOLY" MAN.
5. SWAMI DIRENDRA BRAMACHARI - THE "GODLY" RAMBO.
Don't you see how these people fool and cheat the world!
THE HARE RAMA HARE KRISHNA MOVEMENT
This group is now attracting hundreds of drug addicts in the U.S. and THE WEST. Like the Hindu Saints (Sanyasis) of Kashi (Varnasi) they smoke and take drugs in all sorts of different forms. A UNI press report (15-8-1987) said, under the heading of "SECT CHIEF IS CONVICTED KILLER". - that the Hare Krishna's chief is a convicted killer and drug dealer. The swami, 38 year old Thomas Drescher, is imprisoned at the West Virginia state penitentiary for gunning down Steven Bryant, 33, in Los Angeles. Drescher was also convicted in 1979 for manufacturing and distributing drugs and was found guilty in January 1983 of slaying a Krishna devotee. Finally the report concludes that since 1977, seven of the original I I gurus named by the HARE RAMA HARE KRISHNA movements founder have been removed for reasons ranging from CHILD abuse, DRUG dealing and SEXUAL promiscuity. O Ramacandra, these scriptural injunctions were laid down by learned men, skilled in inducing others to give, and finding other means of obtaining wealth, thus subjugating the simple-minded. Their doctrine is 'Sacrifice, give in charity, conse- crate yourselves, undergo austerities, and become ascetics'. 0 Rama, be wise, there exists no world but this, that is certain! Enjoy that which is present and cast behind thee that which is unpleasant! Adopting the principle acceptable to all, do thou receive the kingdom offered thee by Bharat (Ramayana, Ayodhya Kanda, 108).
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
1. What good has Hinduism done for India? 2. Does Hinduism have the answers for todays problems? Alcoholism - Drugs- Divorce - Suicide etc. 3. Do these gods move, think or speak? 4. Can they defend themselves if attacked; or mend themselves if broken? 5. Don'1 you think it foolish to worship these manmade objects? 6. Does India belong to the Indians (95 %) or the Brahmins (5%)? 7. Did Hinduism originate in India itself or did it come with the Aryans via the Khyber Pass? 8. Can a person convert and become a Brahmin? 9. What is the relationship between the Aryans of India (Brahmins) and the Aryans of Germany (Hitler's Nazis)? 10. Why do the Brahmins and Nazis have the same symbol - the Swastika? (Look at the racist National Front symbols in South Africa). 11. Ask yourself who is your God? Is it Shiva, who has the moon and river Ganges on his head and who could not identify his own son? Or is it Rama who couldn't see through Sukrievan's disguise and who murdered another god? Or could it be Krishna, the "playboy god"?
THE BRAHMIN CONSPIRACY
The conspiracy and intrigue of domination over other human beings has been the main objective of Brahminism all along. Brahminism, an Aryan concoction of human and insatiable lust for hegemony, sex and money, sought to rule the ignorant and deprived masses in the name of religion. This is very visible from the content, tone and message of the holy books, written and perpetuated in the name of religion by the Brahmins. How can these books be called the word of God? They contain the most exotic form of pornography, the most depraved norms of behaviour and the most unjust and ugly system of life based on extortion, cruelty and blood thirst hunger for domination over others. The Hindus are not Brahmins and the Brahmins are not Hindus. At least this is evident from the books written and perpetrated by the Brahmins themselves. The Hindus are the original inhabitants of Hindustan, the very people who were the true architects of the Indus Valley civilization which was considered to be one of the best examples of human societal development in the entire history of the human race. The barbaric Brahmins came from the wastelands of the region beyond the Himalayas and destroyed the great monuments of culture and civilization and pushed the real inhabitants of India into slavery. Slavery is the message of the Brahmins "holy" books concocted by them. Just as the Jews divided humanity into Jew and Non Jew, so has the Brahmin. The whole world is classified in these books as Brahmin and Non Brahmin. The non Brahmin is to remain internally a slave unto the "master" who has dominated Indian history since he lay his hand on it. We must break the chains, once and for ever. The bondage and the slavery must go. But first let us find out what these books say. On concept of democracy, social justice, secularism, politics, economics, leadership and elections are all based on the wretched caste system, an evil curse that has been spun round the necks of the innocent and deprived. Let us tear the mask away from those evil faces, which stare at us from every nook and corner of our lives. The intelligent reader can easily uncover the ulterior motives of Brahmins as to why they incite High Caste Hindu mobs to kill Low Caste Hindus or for creating communal tensions with other minorities ever so often. This they do in order to continue their stranglehold on state policies, so that they can manipulate them to their advantage; they don't care adamn for the nation of India...
Read for yourself what the Brahmin priest Purshottam Rao has to say...... PURSHOTTAM RAO Temple priest HYDERABAD
Q: Should sadhus enter politics?
A: There was a time when Brahmins used to dictate state policy. Now we have been totally sidelined. The VHP is trying to correct this historical wrong by bringing religious leaders to the forefront of our national life. It is now time for the entire Hindu religious leadership to once again lead the nation.
The Continuing War on Low Caste Hindus......
NEW DELHI, Sept. 19 (R) - Three Indian students set themselves ablaze today to try to shock the government into scrapping plans to reserve more government jobs for low castes in the Hindu hierarchy. 'This (job's plan) is for the poor classes who have been denied their rights for thousands of years. The students shouldn't come in their way," Paswan told Reuters. Protests led by upper-caste students began sweeping north India soon after Prime Minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh said on August 7 that 27 percent of government jobs would be set aside for low castes. Paswan was himself born an "untouchable" or outcast in the system, which traditionally decides occupation and status by birth. "Untouchables" prefer to call themselves "Dalits," the oppressed. Paswan told a conference of political leaders and officials today that the jobs plan had to go ahead to raise the status of low castes and create a more sympathetic bureaucracy. He said the upper castes were still taking jobs set aside 40 years ago for Dalits. Bureaucrats would employ an upper-caste graduate with irrelevant qualifications for a typist's job and turn down a Dalit trained to type at 60 words per minute, he said.
Pornography In Ramayana Dr. Charles claims that Ramayana contains much pornographic materials and cannot be read in public. He gives the following examples.
Rama's description of Sita's beauty which is lewdly detailed (refer to C.R Srinivasa lyengar's translation of Aranya Kandam - Chapter 46). In Kiskind Kandam, Rama explains to Lakshmana of his sexual experience with Sita.
Brahmins as beef-eaters According to the Ramayana, the Aryans (Brahmins) used to drink liquor (nine different kinds), eat beef, marry many wives and prostitution was an accepted way of life amongst the priests and gods.
"Sura" means alcoholic drink. All the Aryan gods drink "sura" and hence they are called suras as against a suras wo don't drink. Ravana was an asura. Periyar E.V.Ramaswamy, a great Hindu leader of Tamil Nadu, was a worshipper of Ravan because Ravana was a Dravidian.
Ramanaya also recounts the story of king Dasaratha who, in order to have a baby son, made a big sacrifice (yagam) of sheep, cattle, horses, birds and snakes. He then delivered his three wives Kaushaliya, Sumatirai and Kaikeyi to three priests. These holy men, having fully satisfied their carnal desire, returned the ladies to the king. By this means, the king was able to have three sons-Ram, Lakshman and Bharat (Bala Kandam, Chapter 14. For more details on yagam, refer to the book "Gnana Surian", published by the kudi Arasu Press.)
Does it mean Rama was born to a Brahmin?
The Ramayana tells us much about the unlawful relationship of incest but we do not feel it appropriate or decent for ut to go in details (Please refer to Aranya Kandam, chapter 45 verses 122, 123, 124, & 125).
The following Aryan practices will reveal how immorality and indecency are sanctified in the name of Hinduism.
LINGAM & YOUNI
Lingam and Yoni in Sanskrit means the male and female sexual organs respectively. Hindus are allowed to worship anything - including sexual organs. It is not unknown for them to name their children as Shiva Lingam (God Shiva's sexual organ) or Rama Lingam (God Rama's sexual organ), (in some places in Karnataka, the gods demand both male and females to pray naked together).
DEVADASI (RELIGIOUS PROSTITUTION).
The Devadasi system was set up, according to a Times of India report (10-11-87), as a result of conspiracy between the feudal class and the priests (Brahmins). The latter, with their ideological and religious hold over the peasants and craftsmen, devised a means that gave prostitution their religious sanction. Poor low-caste Hindu girls, initially sold at private auctions, were later "dedicated" to the temples. They were then initiated in to prostitution Even to this day this religious prostitution blessed by Hindu religion is still alive in Karnataka and Maharashtra.
BHARAT NATYAM & THE BRAHMINS
The Bharat Natyam is a dance performance which, because of the Brahmin media, has gained much recognition as a form of art. The celebrated Bharat Natya expert, Rukmini Devi, admits in National Geographic video program, that the Barahta Natayam was really the art of Devadasis (temple prostitutes) to please their audience and admirers. This is the reason why you might have seen various Baratha Natyam postures in Hindu temples. May be like the art of KARATE of the Japanese, the BHARAT NATYAM is a national art to the Brahmins and very much part of their culture.
THE KAMASUTRA
Brahmins has also created Kamasutra - a set of instructions on how to have sexual intercourse. Some of the postures detailed in Kamasutra are so complex that they can only be performed with the help of one or more ASSISTANTS! Some Hindu temples have stone carvings of Kamasutra sexual poses and Hindus worship them.
THE DEVADASI SYSTEM THRIVES
UNI. - TIMES OF INDIA - 10th Nov 1987: confirms that the practice of dedication young Harijan (Hindu) girls (Mahars, Mangs, Dowris and Chambhar) at childhood to a goddess, and their initiation into prostitution when they attain puberty continues to thrive in Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and other parts of South India. This is largely due to social backwardness, poverty and illiteracy, according to a study by two doctors of the India Health Organization.
The report clearly indicates that the Devadasi system was the result of a conspiracy between the feudal class and the priests (Brahmins) who with their ideological and religious hold over the peasants and craftsmen, devised a practice which acquired religious sanctions. They noted in their study on - "Devadasis" - "the link between religious culture and child prostitution".
The study revealed that girls from poor Hindu families were sold after puberty at private auctions to a master who initially paid a sum of money to the families ranging from 500 to Rs. 5,000.
The study, made during health camps organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Devadasi populated areas, revealed that the dedicated girls formed 15 percent of the total women involved in prostitution in the country, and as much as 70 percent of the prostitutes in the border districts of Karnataka and Maharashtra.
THE NAKED HINDU YOGIS OF KASHI
Many of the yogis of Kashi (Banaras) lived naked and beg for their living. They live in dirty, unhygienic conditions, and drug addiction is rampant among them.
Our so-called leaders and intellectuals have all contributed to the superstitions beliefs and they have helped these saints to thrive and practice deceptive methods to cheat the public.. It is an utter shame that among the worshipers of such naked god men, there are a number of high court judges, advocates, engineer, doctors, professors, politicians, cinema actors and actersses. Even the Prime Minister & President of India.
For more details on these Hindus and yogis, watch the documentary video - 'SHOCKING ASIA" - which is available from the following addresses:
Atlas International Film GMBH, Munich, W. Germany. Reply Video, London, G. Britain. Distribution First Film Organization, Hong Kong.
Dr. H. Narasimhaiah, a devoted Hindu and a former Vice Chancellor of Bangalore University, was dismissed for waging a war against Satya Sai Baba's hypnotism advertised as godly powers. He may be contacted at the National College, Basavangudi, Bangalore - 4 (India).
STARK NAKED BATH !
News Agency reports on 23-9-87 said that at Kurushetra (India) about 1,000 NAKED Hindu "Sadhus" (saints) plunged themselves into the river during a solar eclipse, claiming this to be a "holy dip" Over one million pilgrims, naked and semi naked, both male and female, also followed into the river. The largest of the pools is brahmasarover, and is said to accommodate 10,000 bathers at a time There was still no room for everyone in the water at one time and there was much pushing and shoving. The huge crowds waiting on the banks barely had space to turn around. People crowded the shore waiting for their chance. This is the position of "holy dip" everywhere in India. A harayana Government spokesman said that they posted 20,000 policemen to avoid misuse of this mixing opportunity for perverted reasons.
In addition to this spectacle the pilgrims also look directly at the sun with the naked eye. Scientists and doctors strongly advised against this as it is likely to cause blindness.
THE MIRACLE MAN
DPA news (6-11-86) reports that police have arrested a "miracle man" in the Western India city of Pune for raping a number of women on the pretet of solving their troubles by making them sit naked before an idol which was supposed to render "divine advice". He would hold a blank sheet of paper over a fire on which written words would appear. He would then convince the women to have sex with him on the strength of the "miracle". Police discovered that his "divine advance" was nothing but a simple chemical trick by which words written on paper with invisible ink that became legible when held over a flame.
HOW RISHIS WERE CREATED?
According to the Hindu Holy Books, God Brahma arranged the marriage of God Shiva to goddess Paravthi When they went around the fire as per Hindu religious ritual, god Shiva looked at the thighs of goddess Parvathi and ejaculated his semen into the fire and they became Rishis (preists). According to Hindu Puranas this "god" can do such a filthy act!
SEX WITH COWS
In many Hindu temples there are sculptures depicting men having sex not only with women but also cows What is the meaning of this? Is not the cow sacred? If it is, then it should be worshiped, not sexually assaulted
Hindus born to cows? : Hindus are told by Brahmins that a cow is go-mata, meaning their mother. So Hindu is prohibited from eating beef. But in Kerala, even Hindu hotels sell beef-fry and Hindus eat it even when told it is their mother's flesh. Are not the Kerala Hindus born to cow?
RAMAYANA IS THE CULTURE OF ARYANS (BRAHMINS)
Dr. Charles claims that the Ramayana is nothing but the culture and way of life of the Aryans (Brahmins) which is still having a great impact on persent-day India. According to the Ramayana, the Aryans (Brahmins) used to drink liquor, used to eat beef, used have many wives, and prostitution was a way of life to the Rishis, priests and even the gods.
The concept of "re-incarnation" or avtar is the bed-rock of the Hindu belief. Rama, Vishu, Hanuman etc ... are all believed to be avtars. But according to Hindu scholar Kshiti Mohan Sen, there is nothing in the Vedas to support this belief! Rather, it is an Aryan / Chinese concept that may have crept into the Hindu thoughts. This shakes the whole foundation of Hinduism! "Hindus accept many incarnations of God. While some Hindus take the doctrine literally and accept figures like Rama, Krishna, and Buddha as actual incarnation, others prefer to treat it as a useful myth. 1. The origin of the concept of avatara is obscure. It cannot be found in the Vedas, but it is possible that it came from the Aryan settlers in Iran. The idea of discontinuous incarnations can be found in the Bahram Yasht, which forms part of the Zoroastrian corpus, where incarnations of the deity Verethragna can be seen. According to another theory, the concept originated in central Asia, as the Bahram Yasht shows traces of Chinese influence and mythology. In none of these beliefs, however, does the concept play as important a part as it does in post- Vedic Hindu thought, particularly that of the epics, Ranayana and Mahabharata.
HOW HOLY IS THE COW?
The origin of the holiness of the cow in popular Hinduism is not quite certain. The Aryans loved to eat beef, though they seem to have admired the cow as a very useful animal. The importance of the cow in India's rural life may have something to do with the question." Hindu scholar Kshiti Mohan Sen
REFERENCE FROM
http://www.geocities.com/indiafas/Hindu/part2.htm
[edit] Buddhist Texts
I've posted a new version of the Buddhist texts paragraph that I think is better suited to the article. I feel that the previous version gave too much weight to the writings of Dr. Ambedkar- including those particular quotations from him, without any context or discussion, could give the impression that his opinion was being presented as authoritative. If you'll notice, there are almost no individual works by another author that are sited in that section- everything is just portions of the traditional scriptures. As several authors have made attempts at creating a single-volume introduction to the scriptures, it seems more balanced to give some attention to several of them, rather than focusing entirely on Dr. Ambedkar's personal views on a 'proper' understanding of Buddhist scripture. --Clay Collier 10:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Agree with the change. But would like to mention that the Author has set out clearly in the introduction that "The Buddha and His Dhamma" is a compilation and assembly plant. He claims no originality of the text. I request you to follow the link to the book and read beyond the 'Introduction'. I am sure you will read it to the end. Regarding Babasaheb Ambedkar; There can hardly be a greater authority on Buddhism.--Yeditor 11:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Some advice on your edits
I have reverted your edits in the Vishnu article. They were strongly pov, and not referenced properly. Some of your other edits also seem problematic to me. Please consider the following:
- If you add something, try to write it as neutral as possible and back it up with sources.
- Don't delete links and text only because yout think it is not supporting your personal pov.
- Please read WP:NPOV
--Rayfield 11:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:240x240 bio ambedkar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:240x240 bio ambedkar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism in Caste Article
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
- Based on your history, you are a persistent vandal. I will report you the next time this happens.Netaji 08:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- in accordance with wikipedia rules, I am going to put warning templates for every act of vandalism. If you persist after three warnings, you will be reported as per rules.
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Netaji 12:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- This is your second warning for vandalism:
-
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
[edit] You will be reported for Personal attacks
In accordance with wikipedia rules, this is your first warning against personal attacks. Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. You have two more warnings, after which I will report you.Netaji 12:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- This is now your second warning. You have one more warning:
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Netaji 12:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- This is your final warning:
This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Netaji 12:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
What is your problem Yeditor? There is no need for racist insults just because Netaji is right.Bakaman%% 15:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You are dangerously close to violating WP:3RR rule
If you violate WP:3RR rule I will report you for that also.Netaji 12:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Personal attacks and 3RR
Would you like to be blocked for personal attacks [1] or for 3RR on Caste? Take you pick... either way, its 12h William M. Connolley 17:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 00:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. You give Netaji a warning for vandalism while you vandalize the Manusmriti page. Stop the hypocrisy, were trying to build an encyclopedia, not a megaphone for anti-Brahmin literature.Bakaman Bakatalk 15:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
The content was removed because it was under a Wrong topic. It was also Original research and not referenced. Please stop maligning othersYeditor 13:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh really I'm sorry. I guess I'm a "blatant Hindu vandal". Don't put unwarranted warnings for no reason. Bakaman Bakatalk 14:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
The warning is not unwarrantedYeditor 04:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello Yeditor. Please do not put edit summaries in your edits citing "vandalism" by Bharatveer and Bakasuprman when there clearly is content dispute. This is a form of personal attack. Also, please refrainf from adding bogus vandalism tags. Thanks, Blnguyen | rant-line 03:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC).
Hello blnguyen, Please check history of the multiple reverts been made by these users including user Subhash Bose by citing vandalism, whenever there is a content dispute. I dont think that the warning is unwarranted.Yeditor 04:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I've told them off for using bogus tags as well. Blnguyen | rant-line 04:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ok. Unfortunately Yeditor's edits so far have been extremely hatemongering and anti-Hindu. I suggest he read some serious and broad range of textual material for a balanced view of things and discuss them with specific sources cited. He should not advance POV or make polemical attacks in the article or the talk page against the subject of the article or other editors, for that IS vandalism.Netaji 05:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Prove it. None of my works have been Anti-Hindu. However, this is an encyclopedia. What YOU think is anti-hindu cannot be a criteria for inclusion in wiki. Wiki requires much better standards. I too have a suggestion that first you devote more time in contributing than reverting and coterie formation check this. It will be particularly helpful if remove your Anti-Dalit bais. Your talk page bears evidence of your activities. You have also used the sock puppet ‘Piyushmitra shunga’Yeditor 05:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- "Anti-Dalit"? Dude, I'm a Shudra. That's pretty close to a Dalit. What's next? Are you going to accuse Zakir Naik of being anti-muslim? lol!Netaji 08:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- It will be better if you read the wiki guidelines youself.Wikipedia is NOT the place to indulge in anti hindu Povs.Bharatveer 08:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
-
PLease Stop engaging in warning-warring. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Brahmin conspiracy
Is everything a Brahmin conspiracy? Bakaman Bakatalk 19:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ambedkar
I agree with you that the purpose of wikipedia is to provide complete information. But the part I don't agree with is that all the information needs to be there in the main B. R. Ambedkar article. One of the main goals here is to get the article featured. See WP:WIAFA. One of the criteria there is that the article must be comprehensive, with no major details being left out. Another criteria is that the article must use summary style. Which means that no section should be too long or with too much details. All those details must be moved to daughter articles providing a short but comprehensive summary in the main article. So here is my opinion (and just for the record - I hold no bias for or against Ambedkar. I just want to get the article featured so that it can appear on the main page as a featured article) - Dr. Ambedkar is not a writer. Writing was not his primary occupation and hence does not deserve such a long list. The list is long, and distracting. The least we can do is remove the external links to each article and just provide one link to the site [2]. That means we are providing the user with a proper link, and he can click on the site itself to see whatever work he/she wants to read. Just by doing that we reduce 61 external links to just one. The text can now appear as plain text and less distracting with all those blue links. Secondly, I am still not convinced that we can't find a credible source which mentions the best and most important works of Dr. Ambedkar. What needs to be done in order to meet FA criteria is to shift the list to a separate article. Something like List of writings and speeches of B. R. Ambedkar. At the beginning the list could be just a list, but then could be expanded to have a short summary of each speech. Then in the main article B. R. Ambedkar, the focus would be on the selected works, and explaining why each of those works is important. I want you to think over these suggestions and then decide what would be the best way to go forward so that the article could reach FA status. You could also contact some users like User:Nichalp or User:Taxman to give their opinion on the list. They are quite busy people but their judgements on articles is brilliant. I am sure both of them would suggest the same things that I have suggested. Regards, Aksi_great (talk - review me) 12:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hi AKSI. thanks for your explanation. Check this section Bibliography of Russels Books. on Bertrand Russel page No one can deny that this is an excellent page. And no one can accuse it of being overly lengthy. It contains quite a big list of Russels works. In this context, I dont understand your concerns. I agree that the list definitely requires 'formating' but certainly not 'removing'. Just because most of of Babasahebs works are available online (mainly on one site) does not mean that each of them (writings) cannot not be mentioned on the page. As regards the length of the list, many writings and speeches already grouped under these topics and this list is as concise as it can get. There are several others writings and speeches in English and in other languages ( hindustani and Marathi) which are not available online or have never been translated. You have a point when you suggest links can be removed and list presented as plain text with one link at the bottom. But this does not work when the material exists in multiple websites and it is so. Not everything is in www. ambedkar.org. Anyways thanks. I will find a way to make the list look Presentable Yeditor 13:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Bertrand Russell would be a great example if this were an article on a writer and it is justified to include his works. But that is not the case for Dr. Ambedkar. He is foremost the architect of the constitution and the father of the Dalit movement in India, and the article should focus on that. Embedded lists are only useful in some cases and are should generally. See Wikipedia:Embedded list and Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 14:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Here's one more example - Rabindranath Tagore. Even an article which is about a writer (this is a Featured Article and has also appeared on the main page) does not list out all his works. See partial bibliography section. This is what we should aim for. A partial list containing his works leading to a main article containing a list of all the works. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 14:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Bertrand Russell would be a great example if this were an article on a writer and it is justified to include his works. But that is not the case for Dr. Ambedkar. He is foremost the architect of the constitution and the father of the Dalit movement in India, and the article should focus on that. Embedded lists are only useful in some cases and are should generally. See Wikipedia:Embedded list and Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 14:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Racist Slur
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.
- This is in regard to your racist slur here (by the way, I'm neither Brahmin nor Hindu, for that matter).Hkelkar 16:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- But still Hkelkar you have fear to come forward and meet us? Tu kon aahes te aamhala changalech samazate 170.252.80.2 14:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Oh, and also, you might want to read WP:BLP. Nothing in the Ambedkar article is libelous. All my edits are SOURCED and Ambedkar's comments are from HIS BOOKS THEMSELVES. Plus. Ambedkar has passed away so he is no longer a living person. Don't fabricate wikipedia policy to suit your POV. IF you persist then I will be forced to file a request for Arbitration. I really don't want to do this as I believe that you are capable of reason and have good editing capabilities if you change your attitude and be civil to people instead of trying to bully them down with innaccurate ethnic insults and paranoid claims of propaganda.
-
- I think that if you look at my edits calmly and objectively you will see no negative POV or sectarian bias (which does not apply to me since I follow neither Hinduism or Buddhism as my religion).Hkelkar 16:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
- You have removed sourced edits from Ambedkar. This is not a content dispute but vandalism and if you persist I will report you. You have a history of tendentious edits and this will not reflect well.Please stop
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
Hkelkar 13:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Dont threat everybody to block. Dhammafriend 15:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hkelkar and vandalism
-
- Hkelkar has continuously writing against Indian Buddhist Movement; he is also branding anybody as anti-Hindu. Not coming forward to debate and discuss. When asked to meet personnaly just running away. Dhammafriend 14:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- ..And getting Dhammafriend blocked for being incivil and using racist slurs against Hkelkar and then exposing Dhammafriend's abusive sockpuppetry on RFCU. Yes, this Hkelkar truly is a rascal, isn't he??? Hkelkar 22:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Give proper references
Give references and ASK for proper refernces regarding Brahmin, Hindu articles. Thats is what Babasaheb Ambedkar has tought us. Ambedkaritebuddhist 10:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
