Talk:Yawgmoth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Magic: The Gathering articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I added the section in parentheses about the questionable authenticity of Karona's "meeting" with Yawgmoth. Anyone's happy to edit/delete it if they have additional information on it.

Contents 1 Magic Books 2 Legacy? 3 Magic Books 4 Yawgmoth as a Literary Character...? 5 Non Fictional Perspective?

[edit] Magic Books

Could anyone add the titles of the books where is written Yawgmoth's story, please? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.56.129.243 (talk) 12:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Legacy?

Why is Legacy linked to a wiki page that has nothing to do with Yawgmoth or mtg in general? --Drantin 08:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Magic Books

The mentioned book "The Thran" offers most of the backstory. The books "Invasion" and "Prophesy" chronicle Yawgmoth's invasion. The book "Apocalypse" offers the story of Yawgmoth's personal entrance of Dominaria and of his demise. (along with a couple chapters written from his own veiwpoint.)

[edit] Yawgmoth as a Literary Character...?

Why is there an entire section at the end of the page praising this character? I'm pretty sure that it shouldn't be put in a Wikipedia page that a character "is perfectly suited for fit the role of a villain in its setting".

[edit] Non Fictional Perspective?

I was just reading the tag on this article. How can you write a "non-fictional"-style account about something that is entirely fictional? And, I might add, there is nothing fictitious, slanderous, inaccurate or untruthful about anything said about Yawgmoth in this article. The style in which it is written is unique, but clear and concise nonetheless and does not impede upon the readers understanding... just a thought... Dark Observer (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)