User talk:Yarxia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Mythic inversion

A tag has been placed on Mythic inversion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 17:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I have deleted the article above as, despite it having a note on saying "his page is currently under renovation. please return soon.", there was no meaningful content and no apparent activity ongoing to create any. May I suggest that you work on the article in your userspace, then move it onto the article space when ready? It's also worth bearing in mind our criteria for deletion]. I'd be happy to help if you have any questions. Leithp 18:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copper Queen Mine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Copper Queen Mine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Copper Queen Mine. Gromlakh (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)