Talk:Yaropolk Izyaslavich

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Yaropolk Izyaslavich has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on March 3, 2008.
March 31, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

	Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Russia Portal Yaropolk Izyaslavich is part of the WikiProject Russian history, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Russian history. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	Ukraine Portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	Middle Ages Portal Yaropolk Izyaslavich is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:

	Yaropolk Izyaslavich is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Saints Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   Pass. The article is well written although there are a few typos in the lead.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

   Pass. The article seems to be accurate and has numerous citations and references.

3. It is broad in its coverage:

   Pass. The article seems to have a broad coverage of the topic. It has a section describing the Yaropolk's family background as well as a legacy section.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   'Pass. The article follows WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable:

   Pass. Yes, the article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   Pass. Yes, the article has numerous images and it is also strongly backed up by an infobox and a template.

7. Overall:

   Pass. The article is well written and in my opinion it meets the criteria of a good article, so I have decided to pass it. Kyriakos (talk) 07:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)