User talk:Xy7/Archive-13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

InformationThis is the FireFox talk page archive 13.
If you want to leave me a message, please see my current talk page.


Contents

[edit] SUPER SPEED!

Man, I tried to revert your userpage before you got there, but you beat me to the punch! :( I was also going to edit that vandal meter except I have no idea where the number is to change. Mo0[talk] 19:56, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] You're Welcome and Welcome

What a neat Thank You Template! T'was a slam-dunk, Congrads and welcome to the Cabal!--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 02:46, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting my user page, and for blocking that IP. All I did was vote on one AfD and I've been vandalized more than the whole time I've been here. Anyway, thanks again. Chick Bowen 03:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kyle Weiss deleted.

Hello FireFox.

Glad to meet your accquaintence.

Yesterday I had submitted an article on myself, and noticed it was deleted saying it was an attack page.

I'm admittedly completely ignorant towards how exactly Wiki works, though I used it as a base for general knowledge and common opinion almost on a daily basis. There was a defenition of "blame" that I'm currently posting at work, which lends itself towards failure of management in the workplace. Simply brilliant.

So, the next question is, can that article on myself be restored? I worded it just right and was quite proud of it's poise. Is there a way to verify this isn't an inflamitory statement and is actually being made by the author himself?

I'd greatly like to know for all accounts.

Please, if you wish, I'll check back here, but I can be reached at:

kyleweiss@torche.com

...since you appear to be a moderator/administrator of some kind.

Thanks for your time.

Kyle Weiss

[edit] Vandalism by 216.185.69.65

Hi, FireFox. Saw your "this is your last warning" warning to 216.185.69.65. Well, they just hit Cameroon again (see this edit). Just bringing it to your attention so you can deal with how you think fit. Thanks, —BrianSmithson 19:47, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:141.150.142.127

This user is indeed a returning vandal; he's been attacking my user page, talk page, and other articles for months now. His IPs may have changed, but it's still the same person from the same ISP. Nufy8 21:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

It's no problem. Thanks for restoring the block time. Nufy8 21:49, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Rajput

I would like to draw your attention to rajput page.

I have created the document from a list of 61 books which are mentioned in the references section. Authors have done extensive research in the field of history and then published these books. Muslims and some users like zora/gothean are accusing me of hindutva POV/anti muslim and I have repeatedly asked these muslims and self proclaimed moderators,on the talk page, to point out historically incorrect statements in the article. No one has come forth. Yet they revert my edits. When I ask them for citations they remain quiet.

Also it seems providing references is meaningless here. What seems to be working is how many people one has on there side. i.e what matters on wikipedia is outshouting the other.

Now they are accusing me of impersonating others.

Can you keep an eye out on the rajput page and help prevent the vandalism of Zora/Taaoo/Wisesabre/Supersaiyan?

Shivraj Singh 04:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Psy guy's RfA

Thanks for supporting my RfA. It recently closed with final tally of 51/1/2. I sincerely appreciate it and I hope I can live up to your expectations. I will try my best to be a good administrator. If you ever need anything, just let me know. Thanks! -- Psy guy (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Merci beaucoup

Hey, Firefox! Thanks for your vote of support on my nomination to become an administrator. I passed, and my floor rag has since been bestowed upon me. Please let me know if you need me to help with anything in particular! —BrianSmithson 16:09, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] shivraj

Shivraj Singh is not letting me remove these comments

I find the claim by mohammedans that Shivraj is using multiple pseudonyms to strengthen his postion totally distasteful. But it also shows that these mohammedans are now at their wits end. They do not have any logical arguments left so they are down to levelling level foul charges. Shame on all these pakis!!! Keep the flag flying Shiv.

Sisodia

from the article Rajput's talk page. what do you have to say about that? الثاقب (WiseSabre| talk) 19:17, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

FYI, I removed several vandalistic (and sometimes more racist) attacks by "Sisodia" on the Rajput and Urdu talk pages, and blocked his anonymous IP for 24 hrs, but I left this comment and another because they weren't vandalism. Sisodia, for his part, says that he's only "defending" himself against people who have edited his writing. kwami 20:22, 12 November 2005 (UTC)