User talk:Xreenberg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Image copyright problem with Image:Springvalley_bottle.jpg 2 Anne Keothavong 3 The correct facts.... 4 Verifiable 5 Spring Valley Juice

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Springvalley_bottle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Springvalley_bottle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anne Keothavong

You recently created a page titled Anne Keothavong and I'm just letting you know that I decided to add a bit more to it. Could you take a look for me and let me know what you think? Cheers RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or lets have banter} 11:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The correct facts....

Looks like the page keeps being edited from what I have as the fact 54 to what you have. I have 56 with two different facts and two different colours. Is the 54 Xreenberg has in black or green. my money is on black because my 54 is green and has the fact about the largest pig in history. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ijp-esq (talk • contribs) 05:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Verifiable

just been verifying my entry for 54 and I discovered the 54 about the scollop is actually 78. BTW I have all but 7 lids up to 192! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ijp-esq (talk • contribs) 00:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Spring Valley Juice

It violates Wikipedia:No original research. Who is disputing the "facts"? If there has been a reputable source that says some of the facts are wrong then it should be given. I agree with you that several, way more than the 5 listed, are probably wrong or unprovable but it's not up to Wikipedia editors to say so. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I just thought of something. Try Wikipedia:Village pump and see if somebody can suggest a way to show that certain facts are incorrect without violating the original research policy. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)