Xionites

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.
Please help recruit one or improve this article yourself. See the talk page for details.
Please consider using {{Expert-subject}} to associate this request with a WikiProject
"Barbarians" according to Chinese cosmology. Those in the east were called Dongyi (東夷), those in the west Xirong (西戎), those in the south Nanman (南蠻), and those in the north Beidi (北狄).
"Barbarians" according to Chinese cosmology. Those in the east were called Dongyi (東夷), those in the west Xirong (西戎), those in the south Nanman (南蠻), and those in the north Beidi (北狄).

Chionites, Chionitae or Xionites (Chinese: Xiōng (匈) or Xīróng (西戎) meaning "Western Barbarians", Middle Persian: Xiyon, (Hiun/Hion)) were the westernmost branch of the Hunas, a nomadic tribe prominent in Transoxania and Bactria.[1] These "Western Barbarians" were the original "White Huns" according to the eastern order of cosmic precedence which the central Asian nomads observed [1].

Chionites had arrived in the mid-4th century with the wave of immigration from Central Asia into Iran in late antiquity. They had influenced by the Kushan and Bactrian culture, became a threat on the northeastern frontiers of Sassanid Empire.[1][2]

Contents

[edit] Xyon transferred to Huns

According to Harold Walter Bailey, the name Xyon was transferred later to Huns in general owing to similarity of sound, as Tur was adapted to Turk in Pahlavi tradition.[3]

The name Xyon is familiar in Avestan and Pahlavi texts.[4] In the Avestan tradition (Yts. 9.30-31, 19.87) the Xiiaona were characterized as enemies of Vishtaspa, the patron of Zoroaster.[1] In the later Pahlavi tradition, the Red Huns (Karmir-Hunas) and "White Huns" (Sveta-Hunas) are mentioned.[1]

The Red Huns of the Pahlavi tradition (7th A.D.)[5] has been identified by Bailey as the Kermichiones or Ermechiones of Byzantine record.[1]

[edit] Origins

It is difficult to determine the ethnic composition of Chionites.[1] In addition, there is no evidence that the Chionites were different from the Ephthalites. In other words, the Epthalites may have been a prominent tribe or clan of the Chionites.[6]

According to A.S. Shahbazi (article dated 2005)[7]:

“ On the northeastern front, the Chionites (q.v.), a Hunnic people who by the early fourth century had mixed with north Iranian elements in Transoxiana and adopted the Kushan-Bactrian language, threatened Persia.. ”

According to Wolfgang Felix (article dated 1992)[1]:

“ The Chionites were a tribe of probable Iranian origin that was prominent in Bactria and Transoxania in late antiquity. ”

According to Richard Nelson Frye (book dated 1991)[8]:

“ Just as later nomadic empires were confederations of many peroples, we may tentatively propose that the ruling groups of these invaders were, or at least included, Turkic-speaking tribesman from the east and north, although most probably the bulk of the people in the confederation of Chionites and then Hephtalites spoke an Iranian language and this was the last time in the history of Central Asia that Iranian-speaking nomads played any role; hereafter all nomads would speak Turkic languages. ”

According to Carlile Aylmer Macartney (article dated 1944)[9]:

“ We must consider briefly a third nation playing a role in our sources: the Kermichiones. Who were these people? They cannot have been the Turks-Toue-Kioue, since their embassy reached Constantinople while the Avars were still negotiating with Rome for settlement inside the frontier-probably, therefore, as early as A.D. 558, whereas the true Turks appeared there first in 568; further, their ruler's name was `Aσκήλτ or Scultor, while the Khagan of the Turks at that time was Silzabul, Dizabul, or Istämi. Neither can they have been the Juan Juan, as Marquart suggests; nor the Epthalites, who were well known to the Byzantines and would not have been described in this way. Moreover, the Epthalites were known as White Huns, and Mr. Bailey has pointed out that the word Karmir xyon, meaning Red Chyon, occurs in a Pahlavi text in juxtaposition with SpEt xyon, White Chyon. The name Chyon, originally that of some other race, was "transferred later to the Huns owing to the similarity of sound". The nation can hardly be other than that which appears in the fourth century, under the name of Chionits, in the steppes on the north-west frontier of Persia. These Chionites were probably a branch of the Huns, the other branch of which afterwards appeared in Europe, the latter appear to have attacked and conquered by the Alans, then living between Urals and the Volga about A.D.360, while the first mention of the Chionites is dated A.D.356. In the fifth century the name is replaced by that of the Kushan or of the Kidarite Huns, who are clearly identical with the Kushan. ”

According to Sir Harold Walter Bailey (article dated 1932)[10]:

“ Xyon. This name is familiar in Pahlavi and Avestan texts. It would appear to be a name of an enemy of the Iranian people in Avestan times, transferred later to the Huns owing to similarity of sound, as Tur was adapted to Turk in Pahlavi. In the present passage (a passage from the Pahlavi book of Bahman Yasht) three divisions of this people seem to be recognized, the Xyon with the Turks, the Karmir (Red) Xyon, and the White Xyon. ”

[edit] History

[edit] Early history

Asia in 400 AD, showing the Chionites and their neighbors.
Asia in 400 AD, showing the Chionites and their neighbors.

In the earliest periods, Xiōng (匈) were more of a concern to the Chinese than to the Persians. They dominated the smaller Donghu nations beyond Tianshan in the East Asian steppes who were known as the Xiong (匈)'s Serfs until the Xiōng (匈)'s hold over them was broken by the Chinese by the end of the Sino-Xiongnu War. Chionitae campaigns are better documented in connection to a number of events of the political history of Central Asia particularly during the second half of the 4th century AD until the mid 5th century AD. Their most famous rulers were called the Kidarites. At the end of the 4th century AD, a new wave of Hunnic tribes (Alchoni) invaded Bactria, pushing the royal Kidarite family into Gandhara.[11]

[edit] Alchon

Alchon or Alχon (Uarkhon) became the new name of the Chionites in 460 when Khingila I united the Uar with the Chionites under his Hephthal ruling élite. In India the Alchon were not distinguished from their immediate White Huns predecessors and both are known as Sveta-Hunas there. Perhaps complimenting this term, Procopius (527-565) wrote that they were white skinned, had an organized kingship, and that their life was not wild/nomadic but that they lived in cities. The Alchon were called Varkhon or Varkunites (OuarKhonitai) by Menander Protector (538-582) literally referring to the Uar & Hunnoi. Around 630, Theophylaktos Simokattes wrote that the European "Avars" were initially composed of two nations, the Uar and the Hunnoi tribes. He wrote that: "...the Barsilt, the Unogurs and the Sabirs were struck with horror... and honoured the Newcomers with brilliant gifts..."[12] when the Avars first arrived in their lands in 555AD.

Although the power of the Alchon in Bactria was shattered in the 560's by a combination of Sassanid and proto-Turkic forces, the last Hephthal king Narana/Narendra managed to maintain some kind of rule between 570 and 600 AD over the 'nspk' or 'napki' or 'nezak' tribes that remained after most of the Alchon had fled to the west.

[edit] Coinage

Alchon Huns refers to a tribe which minted coins in Bactria in the 5th & 6th centuries. The name Khigi on one of the coins and Narendra on another has led some scholars of the area to believe that the Hephthalite Khagans Khingila and Narana were of the AlChoNo tribe inscribed in Bactrian script on the coins in question. They imitated the earlier style of their Hephthalite predecessors, the Kidarite Hun successors to the Kushans. In particular the Alchon style imitates the coins of Kidarite Varhran I (syn. Kushan Varhran IV).[13]

[edit] Notes and references

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Wolgang Felix in Encyclopaedia Iranica, "Chionites". (LINK to Online Edition 2006)
  2. ^ A. Shapur Shahbazi in Encyclopedia Iranica, "Sasanian Dynasty". (LINK to Online Edition 2006)
  3. ^ Harold Walter Bailey, Iranian Studies, Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London. BSOAS, vol. 6, No. 4 (1932)
  4. ^ H. W. Bailey Iranian Studies
  5. ^ "Bahman Yasht" in Encyclopedia Iranica by W. Sundermann
  6. ^ Richard Nelson Frye; "Emperor Ardeshir and the cycle of history"
  7. ^ A. Shapur Shahbazi in Encyclopedia Iranica, "Sasanian Dynasty". (LINK to Online Edition 2006)
  8. ^ Richard Nelson Frye, "Pre-Islamic and early Islamic cultures in Central Asia" in "Turko-Persia in historical perspective", edited by Robert L. Canfield, Cambridge University Press, 1991. pg 49.
  9. ^ Carlile Aylmer Macartney, "On the Greek Sources for the History of the Turks in the Sixth Century" Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 11, No. 2. (1944), pp. 266-275.
  10. ^ Harold Walter Bailey, Iranian Studies, Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London. BSOAS, vol. 6, No. 4 (1932)
  11. ^ Nomads of the Steppe
  12. ^ Theophilactus Simocatta, Historiae, -Ed. C. deBoor. Lipsiae, 1887, ps.251, 258
  13. ^ Alchon Huns

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Languages