From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] March 2008
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Not sure why I was blocked. I was not doing anything wrong. I was removing material that was based on one sided political beliefs. This is censoreship. The blocker didnt even give a reason for blocking me. This is wrong."
Decline reason: "The reason for the block is that you were blanking large blocks of well-sourced text, despite repeated warnings, and without consensus on the talk page that those large blocks of well-sourced text should be deleted. When your block expires, make sure that the reasonable people on the talk page agree with you before making big changes again.— FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "These sections where based on political beliefs and not facts. Where does it say in the rules that you can not remove sections of information. The information I was removing was sladering the individual and should be removed. If this site is to resemble an Encyclopedia you can not sections CALLED CONTROVERIES. An encyclopedia is based on facts not news media, newspaper or political agendas. The page I was editing was full of sladerish information that not no reason for being there. The reason I am being blocked is because I am being censored. IS THIS CHINA OR RUSSIA. I was not breaking any rules for this website. I am going to file a comlaing against the origianl admin. He did not even give me a reason for blocking me. THAT IS REQUIRED AS AN ADMIN."
Decline reason: "FisherQueen, in her response above, gave you a reason why you are blocked. You repeatedly removed material, and did not use the article's talk pages to get others to agree with you. Please do NOT do this again, or you may be reblocked. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
You ignored my repeated warnings (which you have since removed) against the removal of sourced material, effectively censoring the article. I assume by the same token that you object to most of the William J. Jefferson article. Encyclopedias are based on material from third-party sources, including newspapers. Please read WP:VERIFY, and use the talk page to attain consensus with other editors before embarking on extensive revisions. Acroterion (talk) 01:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia does, in general, consider the Washington Post, the Associated Press, and ABC News to be reliable sources. If you are basing your actions on the assumption that they are not reliable sources, you will find that other editors will not, in general, agree with your reasoning. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reinstating your block
Based on two emails you sent to me, which you persisted in legal threats, I have reinstated your block, with an additional block against sending emails. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- If you want to have this block reviewed, please email unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org with the following information. Cheers, John Vandenberg (talk) 06:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
