Talk:Xenu/Archive 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

No Volcanos In Australia

I noticed that there was no listing of an affected volcano in Australia. Does this mean that Australia has a protected standing in the eyes of the Church of Scientology? Htcs (talk) 10:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I didn't think Australia had any volcanoes... -- ChrisO (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah Australia does have volcanoes they're just extinced but in Xenu's time would have still been active. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.137.70.14 (talk) 14:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Bill Robertson

The article says "[Bill Robertson] formed the Galactic Patrol, the FreeZoners and Ron's Org, all squirrel groups." Since "squirrel" is a highly pejorative term, isn't it a violation of NPOV to use it in this fashion? -- 65.78.13.238 (talk) 02:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Gone, as the phrasing was indeed pejorative... but there really ought to be some neutrally stated reference to the fact that the Church of Scientology calls them squirrel groups. --GoodDamon 13:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Why not simply link to the Free Zone and let that article tell anyone who's interested that the CoS has this pejorative term it uses for all non-CoS Scientology groups? -- 65.78.13.238 (talk) 13:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I will try not to violate any regulations. This article is amazing. I love the semi sarcastic tone (in a good way). It beats just saying things any day. This is awesome because of the level of interest, level of helpfullness, knowledge in content, how funny it is(that this is what actual people believe) (not directed as an insult), and formality. The creator should be awarded. It is extremely clever how the article states that the story of xenu was high priority classified and how no one should no about it, and then states that many people now know about the story via internet (paraphrasing not quoting) this is genius because it is slyly getting away with what you want to say. I found what i wanted to know with this article plus more. Now i'll be sure to tell many people about this article so that they don't waste any money on a series of object i'm unsure about mentioning due to copyright infringement and the possiblity of being interpreted as influencing marketing or sales. -Peace.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.147.143.153 (talk) 23:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)