User talk:Xchrisblackx

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is suspected that this user has used one or more accounts abusively.
The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.
See block log and lists of suspected and confirmed accounts.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I know for a while my account was compromised (2 times oh the irony!!!) So i've edited under a few different names such as Naga Sadow and i feel i've waited long enough and will accept a permablock if there are any more problems...."

Decline reason: "So you register your account, you immediately start using it for vandalism before it is compromised. Later, you claim it is compromised. Twice. And so you violate WP:SOCK to continue editing? No, sorry, no unblock. — Yamla 14:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Welcome!

Hello, Xchrisblackx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Xiner (talk, email) 22:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Funny....

I admit my first edit was blatant vandalism b/c i was learning to use the system but i have very obvious my account was compromised ask Martial Law about it. Now as for violating any rules look at Naga Sadow no vandalism a few solid weeks of editing to the Star Wars articles F.Mulder solid editing to X-files for a while what is this balderdash.... Excuse me for that but seriously block me if i'm proved wrong i don't care i admit my maturity in the past was a bit iffy but come on folks it is quite obvious my account was compromised.... --C.Black 23:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Leia.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Leia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hey there

Hey there! I wanted to invite you back to The Black Vault Encyclopedia Project... lots has changed since you were there last :)

http://www.theblackvault.com/wiki

Hope to see you around!

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Yoda Dark Rendezvous Cover.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yoda Dark Rendezvous Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tie crawler.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tie crawler.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nancy_Spungen.jpg

I have tagged Image:Nancy_Spungen.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Sfan00 IMG 13:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ladyluck02-th.jpg

I have tagged Image:Ladyluck02-th.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Coredesat 03:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nancy Spungen.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Nancy Spungen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)