Talk:X-Play's sketches and segments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Home Swag Network 2 I'm SHOCKED! 3 Article a mess of tone, pov and OR issues 4 Fair use rationale for Image:Vonvebb1.jpg

[edit] Home Swag Network

If you do a search on G4's website for "schwag" you'll find the reference to the X-Play episode listed in the search results which reads:

X-Play 5057: X-Play checks out games that end in 2!

On tonight's episode of X-Play, we review games that end in 2: Resident Evil Outbreak File 2, Stronghold 2 and Dead to Rights 2. Plus, segments on the "Home Schwag Network" and "Now, That's What I...

But when you actually go to the link, it's written as Home Swag Network -- an during the episode, Morgan pronounced the segment as S-C-H-W-A-G.

Highway 17:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I'm SHOCKED!

Alright, who removed the Shocked with Shad Grimgravy piece of the wiki? Even if it isn't shown on X-Play there, it IS considered a sketch, and it should stay in there! --Seishirou Sakurazuka 21:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article a mess of tone, pov and OR issues

As examples If you sit down and watch the TV show X-Play for any length of time, it will start to look less like a video-game review show and more closely resemble a sketch comedy show such as Saturday Night Live or MADtv , problem 1: addressing the reader directly, problem 2:drawing a conclusion for the reader without a source. While they may claim they're bringing back vaudeville, its not an editors job to tell a reader how a show will begin to look to them. Further issues, Rent It At GameFly.Com contain a lot of information about what people did and why, and no sources. Any OR, NPOV, tone issues not cleaned up in reasonable amount of time will be removed.--Crossmr 00:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Vonvebb1.jpg

Image:Vonvebb1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)