User talk:Ww2censor

This user is a member of WikiProject Philately, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's coverage of the science of philately. Please feel free to join us.

This user is a member of the Motorcycling WikiProject, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's coverage of motorcycles and motorcycling. Please feel free to join us.

1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 Archives

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hashmi, Usman

FYI: Hashmi, Usman (talk · contribs) is being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive420#Blanking_user_talk_page. IP4240207xx (talk) 02:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Prominence rankings

Hi, please go to the infoboxes at Aconcagua, Mount McKinley, Kilimanjaro, Carn Eige, Carrauntoohil and Snowdon. The prominence rankings in these infoboxes have been there for more than a year and their presence there has never been challenged. Besides which, it is sensible to keep the prominence info in one place rather than have it spilling over into the main text. Thanks. Viewfinder 13:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Airmail translation

Hello! Half of the translation is proofread, so I think we can start merging it into the existing article. Kind regards, — Tirk·fl  ^“…”  09:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brown Eyed Girl rating

I have noticed you upgraded the rating of this song article to Start-class but was disappointed to find no comments were left as to why, after a lot of work recently, it doesn't upgrade to a B-grade. Could you offer some suggestions as to what needs to be improved or added? Overall, I am very discouraged to see that the ratings to all the Van Morrison articles by WikiProject Ireland seem to be quite subjective. Here's another example - And It Stoned Me was downgraded to Stub-class by WikiProject Ireland. Are your criteria just much stricter or should Van Morrison's articles not have been categorized in the Ireland Project but only in the Northern Ireland Project? Would he still have been considered in the Ireland Project if he was not now a resident of the Dublin area? I'm sure one has to live in the areas involved to really understand these factors. Thanks Agadant (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Philately assessments

This came up on my watchlist. I don't see how List of entities that have issued postage stamps (A - E) and its siblings can be rated high importance if Compendium of postage stamp issuers (Xa - Yz)‎ is to be rated low. The two lists are similar in purpose but the compendium provides much more detail than the entities. They must be rated the same or the compendium higher.

I presume assessment has only just arrived in philately. I recommend you study other projects and see how they go about things. For example, in the cricket project we have just about got things together after a year or more of trial and effort. The military history project, which is huge, is very organised for assessment and we borrowed a lot from them.

One thing you should have is B-class criteria for quality and you must take a very strict line about top and high importance. BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

We have been working on this since last year though not in any highly active way, while I have been deeply involved with the assessments on the Ireland project so am familiar with the criteria. My feeling was that the List of entities that have issued postage stamps (A - E) +2 should be rated high but that the individual lists, in the overall list of things did not warrant such a rating; mid at best. Maybe they shold all be rated as mid-importance; remember they are only lists not articles but I could be convinced otherwise with a good argument. Perhaps you would get involved in assessing the philatelic articles if the cricket season is not too time consuming. Would you also like to work on some guidelines for the B-class articles? ww2censor (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)