User talk:Writerguy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Writerguy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 22:20, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:DC_Logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DC_Logo.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NMajdan•talk 15:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Petro_Canada_Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Petro_Canada_Logo.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NMajdan•talk 15:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Canadianization

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Canadianization) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. BigDT 00:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Comments about Canadianization: Excuse me?

Excuse me? I appreciate your comments about the graphics I attempted to upload, as noted above. I realized in retrospect that I was making an error, so I withdrew the uploads.

However, why would you insultingly characterize my entry on "Canadianization" as nonsense? The definition I gave is standard usage in the broadcast industry worldwide, or at least, it was until the mid-90's. If you would like me to provide some data to back this up, I will, but why did you not simply post a request for more substantiation on the article itself, as opposed to removing it? Isn't that standard Wikipedia practice?

Writerguy 18:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Dupuis

[edit] Speedy deletion of John Dupuis(Canadian science fiction editor and critic)

A tag has been placed on John Dupuis(Canadian science fiction editor and critic), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

See Discussion page.


Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Chopin-Ate-Liszt! 01:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


So be it. The 'speedy deletes' aren't supposed to go through like that, and I apologize. I was hoping you might read the notice before its deletion, and provide the necessary objections. My intentions are only to improve this website, and as such I have been trying to help get rid of unnecessary articles. I support you re-creating the article, so long as the following criteria are met (truly, these are more like recommendations):

1. The article title is rather long. (perhaps 'John Dupuis (Sci-fi editor)')
2. The article needs to contain sourced information, and should not be from your personal knowledge (though I do not doubt it's validity). This is extremely important.
3. You should provide the necessary links to the page wherever his name is present (exg. 'Aurora Award' page)
4 Provide more information (the biggest reason I felt it should be deleted, was the lack of intra-article information. From links in other places(once, again , 'Aurora Awards') one could deduce most of the article's subject.)
  • I will be happy to author the article if you do not wish to. (I also think this might help, since, as a colleague of the subject, your authorship may be slightly bias)

I apoligize sincerely for the inconvenience, however you will be glad to know I have the contents of the original text right here:


John Dupuis is a Canadian science fiction editor and critic currently living in Toronto. He has been active in science fiction circles for many years, and was one of the founders of Montreal's annual Con*Cept science fiction convention.

In 1997-98, Dupuis co-edited Canada's first alternate history anthology, Arrowdreams: An Anthology of Alternate Canadas with Montreal author Mark Shainblum. The book garnered two Aurora Awards for Canadian science fiction.

He currently works as a librarian at York University in Toronto.

(I am amazed the co-author of an award winning science fiction anthology is complaining about rewriting so much text, but once again, I'm happy to do it.)

  • Finally, on a more personal level, I know my place as an editor, and like all humans, am a victim of mistakes. I would also encourage you to stop making edits to your own page, and pages of subjects you are associated with in real life. Though you may have more knowledge on the subjects, as previously mentioned, you might add slightly biased material, and especially unsourced material. --Chopin-Ate-Liszt! 21:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Cott1_a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cott1_a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cott1_a.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cott1_a.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cott1 a.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cott1 a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of McGill University people

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of McGill University people, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. J 23:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of List of McGill University people

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of McGill University people, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of McGill University people. Thank you. J 00:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IBS link

Hi,

I just removed the link you placed on the irritable bowel syndrome page, and I thought you might like an explanation (were it one of the generic spamlinks that get regularly thrown in the EL section I wouldn't bother, but this is potentially a valuable one and I don't want to disuade you from adding appropriate links). I looked over the link and was impressed with the length and detail of the organization's page. On some pages a link like this would be valuable. However, the IBS page is extremely lengthy, with 27 sections and 124 references. Also, the infobox at the top of the page contains links to the Diseases Database, MedlinePlus and eMedicine pages on IBS, all of which link to generic, encyclopedia-style information. WP:EL states that links should be kept to a minimum, and the section on links to be avoided first criteria is "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article." I don't see what this resource adds to the page that is beyond what would be contained in an IBS featured article, and this is the primary reason I removed it. Hope this clears things up. Thanks, WLU (talk) 17:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Csl logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Csl logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)