User talk:Wrad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

[edit] Merchant of Venice

Thanks for deleting the religious section. I didn't want to be too bold.

Eric144 (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AV

Please add and revise! I apologize if I sound defensive. Too many lunatics descend on the page and add unsourced nonsense. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 20:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

ROTL. You are doing it too. Shakespeare did not use the AV 'cause it didn't come out until 1611!!!! The Tempest came out in 1611...his last known play. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmmmm. Maybe I'm misreading you. Shakespeare is most likely to have used the Geneva Bible, which is what you said, right? Anyway, any author before 1700 is unlikely to have used or been influenced by the AV. Apologies for my comprehension. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, okay, I get it now. Wrad (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Yup. I was confused by the syntax. I thought your parathentical comment was about the AV. Isn't texting wonderful. At least we didn't start blocking each other and and taking it to ArbCom. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Heads up

Ottava Rima has a long block log. And, he claims to read Spanish: see User:Ottava Rima. Hopefully, this will cool down. And, sorry for my stupidity above:-) Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

No prob. Wrad (talk) 02:20, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] To someone well-deserving

		The University Barnstar
		For being the "father" of WikiProject Brigham Young University, supporting it alone for so long, and continuing to improve it still today. Cheers! Eustress (talk) 01:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] R&J

That's great to hear! Thanks.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 00:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:2007big12.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:2007big12.GIF. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 22 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Three Witches, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bobet 01:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar of Murder!!

		Barnstar of Murder, Madness, and Mayhem
		On behalf of Murder, Madness, and Mayhem, this barnstar is to thank you for your hard work and patience in motivating, mentoring, and moulding the work of student editors, and helping them to achieve excellence in research and writing. As coordinator of the FA-Team's Mission 1, as well as an individual editor, you did a fantastic job. Thank you so much! On behalf of the entire class of UBC's SPAN312. --jbmurray (talk\|contribs) 00:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dune

Nope, not doing the review, just giving a hand. I saw what I thought are some significant issues and I don't have a lot of time to contribute to fixing them directly, so I wanted them identified so someone could start addressing them before the Review finished. That's all.
Jim Dunning | talk 23:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Transmission of Greek philosophical ideas in the Middle Ages

I left some comments on the talk page of that article. Don't take it too bad. Hinnibilis (talk) 18:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Wrad (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

In fact I've worked on it a little. Take a look sometime. Hinnibilis (talk) 19:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Done much more work on this, as you see. Thank you for reminding me of the need for references! Do you think this could make a featured article? Would you be able to help? I've never gone through this process before. Hinnibilis (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

We can certainly go for GA! After that we'll see how it looks. Wrad (talk) 19:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Note it needs another few weeks work. Also there are some things you say there that are somewhat confusing - you have given references which I do not have. Perhaps we could discuss later. I am signing off for tonight, it being Europe. Best wishes from the horse. Hinnibilis (talk) 19:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Wrad (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WPBYU Collaboration for May

This month's WP BYU Collaboration of the Month is J. Reuben Clark Law School. I look forward to working with you to improve the article. Thank you! --Eustress (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The line [which shall] stretch out until the crack of doom

Sure, I'll be happy to do the CE, and by all means, let's find out what someone else thinks. I'll copyedit it tomorrow. – Scartol • Tok 00:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey Wrad, I just wanted to stop by and apologizing for not doing the CE yet. Some stuff came up, but I should get to it today or tomorrow. Apologies. – Scartol • Tok 11:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Wrad (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I'm all done with the copyedit. A couple of comments:

The last part of "Source" feels out of place. Starting with "In any case, Shakespeare manages to separate Banquo from the King's murder...", these sentences seem more appropriate in the "Foil to Macbeth" section.

Sometimes King is capitalized and sometimes it's not; you should decide which way you want to go and standardize them. (Usually king is only capitalized when referring to a specific named king, as in King James I.)

The tenses sometimes move around. I've tried to align them all with the literary present (Banquo is merely setting aside his sword...), but you should take another look to be sure I didn't miss any.

Kudos for all your hard work so far, and good luck with this article! – Scartol • Tok 15:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Wrad (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Homeschooling May 2008 Newsletter

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue Four • May 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News Collaboration of the Month nominations are currently open for WikiProject Homeschooling's Collaboration of the month. So far there have been two nominations. You can nominate and vote at May's Collaboration page (link). Project member count reaches 37 members! Invite others using our invitation templates. A new article, List of homeschooled individuals has been created. You can help the project by tagging the talk pages of articles with `{{WikiProject Homeschooling}}` We are working on getting the homeschooling article to GA status.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by Diligent Terrier (and friends). Newsletter delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot

The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier.

[edit] WP BYU Weekly Collab

Hello. I've been picking the WPBYU Collaborations of the Week lately and was wondering if you would like to pick one for this month. I'm not the leader of the WP, just trying to keep the ball rolling. I'd, subsequently, be willing to send out a message to all on the WP to apprise them of your selection. If you're not interested just let me know. Thanks! --Eustress (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I never heard back from you, so I went ahead and chose. Thanks! --Eustress (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Poetry

Why on earth did you delete me from the list of participants?--Poetlister (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

We had a project roll call and whoever didn't answer was removed. Wrad (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The FA-Team

Hi. There has been some discussion of how to improve the FA-Team's functioning. It's be grand if you could comment on the new suggested structure, and perhaps also look at our current proposals. Thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 18:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Arabic Wikipedia

Very Honorable Ward, I just want to ask if you can speak Arabic. Because, there is an account on Arabic wp (ar:مستخدم:ورادر) that tells that you have created it. Thank you very much. --DrFO.Jr.Tn (talk) 20:54, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Brigham Young University Collaboration for June 2008

The current WPBYU collaboration for the period ending June 30, 2008 is:

BYU Jerusalem Center

Our July 2008 project is TBD. If you would like to nominate an article for a future project or see what articles we've already collaborated on, please visit the Collaboration talk page.

Thanks to all those who helped out with May's collaborative project (J. Reuben Clark Law School) and other BYU-related articles. I look forward to working with you on this month's article. Go Cougars! --Eustress (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BYU Jerusalem Center

Hello. I noticed you just added some text saying that the JC was dedicated by Howard W. Hunter; however, the source in the Lead section says it was dedicated by Ezra Taft Benson. I'm pretty sure it was Benson but wanted to see if you would like to look into it first. Thanks. --Eustress (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I investigated a little more and found another reputable source...turns out that Hunter (then-President of the Q12) dedicated the Center while Benson was Pres. of the LDS Church. Thanks. --Eustress (talk) 18:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello again. You're doing great work on the article, and I just wanted to submit a friendly reminder that if we use WP:Cite web formatting as we go, it will save us a lot of time when we nominate the article for GA status. Thanks. --Eustress (talk) 20:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I usually just write a quick rough draft and then add the template in later. Wrad (talk) 20:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

You know... If we wrote to BYU I bet they'd let us use some nice pictures of theirs for these articles. Wrad (talk) 22:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

lol...I was just looking at http://www.ldsces.org/inst_manuals/pres-sm/images/14-242-1.gif and thinking the same thing :) --Eustress (talk) 23:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mormon leaders calling BYU the flagship

I think it's neutral, informative, and necessary to indicate that BYU has been described as the flagship. The Bateman talk I link to is great. Check it out. A BYU outsider, someone from Korea, for example, should be able to know from Wikipedia that BYU is the de facto flagship in Mormonism. The church avoids formally stating this probably to avoid insulting people to go to BYU-Idaho, Hawaii, and LDSBC. But that doesn't change the fact that it's true. P. S. don't revert my change more than 3 times in one day... JackWilliams (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

This introduces nothing new and your addition "Mormon leaders" is much too simplistic to cause anything but unbalanced confusion on the flagship issue. Wrad (talk) 01:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Confusion is not knowing that BYU-Provo is a much better Mormon school than all the others. Outsiders need to know this. Let's make this article useful.JackWilliams (talk) 01:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Get your thick head out of your prideful rear end and try to get it wrapped around the idea that BYU isn't the best school in the system. It isn't. Wrad (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Actually, it has nothing to do with pride. Yes, I went to BYU-Provo. But I didn't go to Harvard. I have no problem saying that Harvard is a better school than BYU-Provo. If I had gone to BYU-Idaho, I would like to think that I would be neutral enough to admit that BYU-Provo is better than BYU-Idaho. Wikipedia should be neutral and informative. Saying that BYU-Provo is the flagship of Mormon schools is both. I even link to a talk by Mormon leaders who say that BYU is the flagship!JackWilliams (talk) 01:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

That is just blatant POV and untrue. Each school has its strength. And it's funny how you say Mormon leaders when only one or two people have ever said such a thing! And that was 20-30 years ago! It's just plain false! Wrad (talk) 01:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Bateman, Kimball, Romney, Oaks, and Maeser. Bateman said it not too long ago. (I think in 2001). And what proof do you have that "it's just plain false" ? JackWilliams (talk) 01:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

All I see in your citation is Kimball. One person. I see no citations for your list here. You're going to have to do better than that. Wrad (talk) 01:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)