Template talk:WP Pakistan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Pakistan which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan and Pakistan-related topics. For guidelines see WikiProject Pakistan and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. |
| Template | This article has been rated as template-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
WikiProject History of Pakistan
[edit] Nesting condition
Resolved. The situation had been addressed but the discussion was dead by then. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 01:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)This template appears in many pages with multiple WikiProjects. Can any editor edit the template to implement the "nesting=yes" parameter so that it can be used in the composite template. — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 10:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Can you give some examples/links? Szhaider 15:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Punjab
This is the only way for the collaborative effort of WP Pakistan and WP India to create WP Punjab can help. On User talk:Nobleeagle, Nichalp has explained this to me. If WP Pakistan does not want to comply then I might as well stuff the idea of WP Punjab and instead create WP Punjab (India) only. — Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 06:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Frankly, I couldn't really get your point. I say you can put a separate banner for WikiProject Punjab (which covers Punjab region divided among two countries) on Punjab related Pakistani articles. Szhaider 07:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, it seems a bit of misunderstanding and bad blood has created an issue when there really wasn't one. The fact is that Punjab split into seperate entities in 1947. So for post-1947 articles, the {{WP India}} template just says that "This article is supported by the Punjab workgroup" while for pages pre-1947 {{WP Punjab}} is used. {{WP Pakistan}} doesn't support that option through your reverts, so you are saying that {{WP Punjab}} will have to be used on post-1947 Pakistan-related articles. — Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 07:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Only if you want to use {{WP Punjab}}. Right now, I am not as much interested in a child project when parent project is anything but complete. In my opinion, {{WP Punjab (Pakistan)}} (which apparntly needs to be created) could be more appropriate with that Punjab Task-force addition in it. I want to put all of my focus on repairing and completeing WikiProject Pakistan pages (not the articles which it covers). After that, I will discuss (if not banned) with other members of the project about proposals of expansion of the project. I have rejected some proposals from Pakistani editors because I thought they were not practical right now. Thanks to them, those editors understood my point and actually helped me. Szhaider 07:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, it seems a bit of misunderstanding and bad blood has created an issue when there really wasn't one. The fact is that Punjab split into seperate entities in 1947. So for post-1947 articles, the {{WP India}} template just says that "This article is supported by the Punjab workgroup" while for pages pre-1947 {{WP Punjab}} is used. {{WP Pakistan}} doesn't support that option through your reverts, so you are saying that {{WP Punjab}} will have to be used on post-1947 Pakistan-related articles. — Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 07:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] B - class criteria
How about adding B - class criteria list in the template, like many other projects? It will certainly lead newbies that what an article is lacking. --SMS Talk 09:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
