Talk:World citizen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, an attempt to improve, organise and standardise Wikipedia's articles in the area of politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Anti-war, a collective approach to organizing and unifying articles related to the anti-war movement. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] references

  • i added 3 new references if anyone wants to use them in the article (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont · email 20:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


The term "World Citizen" was originally coined prior to the founding of the United Nations Correspondents Association. It is also possible, and much more in union with original philosophy, that disapproving of "traditional geopolitical divisions derived from national citizenship" does not mean that one approves of world government nor democracy. More later. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssauble (talk • contribs) 03:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] subjective or incomplete

This is my personal opinion, but I find this definition of world citizen quiet subjective or incomplete. What does "traditional" mean in "traditional geopolitical divisions"? Is the "world citizen" who approves at least in part geopolitical divisions still a "world citizen"? I think yes. Moreover, what is the link between a world citizen and democracy? Tannhäusergate (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not too enthusiastic about merging

Workd citizen is about a political goal to create democratic world institutions of which all earthlings would be citizens. Global citizenship is more vague, it is the feeling to belong to the same world. A merger might confuse those two aspects, they are certainly complementary but are not at the same level. BTW, another article about a close concept is democratic globalization, which has its own approach also. We have here quite a rich topic, and to have three article to show each side of it is quite justified. --Pgreenfinch (talk) 08:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)